GROUNDS FOR REJECTION Sample Clauses

The "Grounds for Rejection" clause defines the specific reasons or circumstances under which a party may refuse to accept goods, services, or contractual deliverables. Typically, this clause outlines criteria such as non-conformity to agreed specifications, late delivery, or defects in quality or performance. By clearly stating what constitutes valid grounds for rejection, the clause helps prevent disputes by ensuring both parties understand when a rejection is justified and what standards must be met.
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject— (A) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that-- (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; or (B) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by arbitration under subsection (b) if it finds that the agreement does not meet the requirements of section 251, including the regulations prescribed by the Commission pursuant to section 251, or the standards set forth in subsection (d) of this section. Also, under authority granted to the Commission by Section 252(e)(3) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, this Amendment has been reviewed for consistency with the requirements of the Illinois Public Utilities Act, 220 ILCS 5, and regulations, rules and orders adopted pursuant thereof. I APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 252(e)
View SourceView Similar (4)
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject— (A) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that-- (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Also, under authority granted to the Commission by Section 252(e)(3) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, this Amendment has been reviewed for consistency with the requirements of the Illinois Public Utilities Act, 220 ILCS 5, and regulations, rules and orders adopted pursuant thereof. I APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 252(e)
View SourceView Similar (4)
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. Projects shall not be approved when: 15.1. There are reasons to doubt the truthfulness of the documents submitted. 15.2. It is verified that some documents and requirements submitted do not meet the provisions of this Manual. 15.3. The applicant producer or project falls into any of the circumstances provided for in Article 10 of this Manual. 15.4. The CPFC considers that the project is not consistent with the purposes established in Law 1556 of 2012 (promotion of the national territory for filming; promotion of the tourist activity, the country’s image, and the development of the national film industry).
View SourceView Similar (2)
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject -- (A) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation if it finds that -- (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; . . . Accordingly, the Board may not reject the proposed Resale Agreement in whole or in part unless it finds that the agreement or any material portion thereof discriminates against a non-party carrier or is inconsistent with the public interest. The Board may also establish and enforce other requirements of State law in its review of the agreement under Section 252(e)(3). The federal Act also mandates that the State commission make available to the public each agreement approved by it. Id. at § 252(h). Finally, Section 252(i) of the Act requires that the LEC, Bell Atlantic, make available "any interconnection, service, or network element provided under an agreement approved under this section to which it is a party to any other requesting telecommunications carrier upon the same terms and conditions as those provided in the agreement." This provision helps ensure that the LEC will not agree to terms and conditions that are discriminatory. As the Board found in Docket 5905, Section 252(e)(1) of this Act requires that the Board "approve or reject the agreement with written findings as to any deficiencies." Thus, the Board cannot condition approval. Instead, the Board must either approve the agreement or reject it, specifying the changes the parties must make to render the agreement approvable. Based upon the record in this proceeding, I hereby report the following findings of fact in accordance with the provisions of 30 V.S.A. § 8.
View SourceView Similar (2)
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. PROXIMUS may reject the subscription application or refuse access to foreign networks or to certain additional services and options such as call forwarding, for one of the following reasons: - the Customer refuses to be subject to the terms and conditions set out in Article 1.2; - the Customer has failed to honor the obligations incumbent upon him/her under another contract concluded with PROXIMUS ; - in case of proven fraud or non-payment on the part of the Customer; - the Customer provides a false or erroneous identity.
View Source
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. All proposals may be rejected whenever the determination is made that the proposals received are not really competitive, when the cost is not reasonable, or when the cost exceeds the amount expected. Additionally, a proposal may be rejected if: • It is received after the due date and time for submittal. • The cost submittal is unsigned. • Duplicative staff from other current fire debris removal projects are proposed for primary staff positions within the Proposer’s team. • The proposal cost is not prepared as required by the RFP. • The Proposer has been prohibited from contracting with the County. • The Proposer has received a negative contract performance evaluation from the County in the past. • Any items required by the RFP are not included with the submittal. No proposal may be rejected arbitrarily or without reasonable cause.
View Source
GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject ‑‑ (A) An agreement (or portion thereof) adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that ‑‑ (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; . (1) whether the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) whether or, not the implementation of such agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Further, any party contending that a negotiated agreement is either discriminatory or contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity has the burden of proving such. IV. In the instant matter, the Agreement between BellSouth and SECT provides inter alia for the interconnection of BellSouth's network and SBCT's network, the unbundling of specific network elements offered by BellSouth and the resale of BellSouth's telecommunications services to SECT. V. Because all rates set forth in the Agreement have been agreed to between SECT and BellSouth, they have requested a waiver of Section VIII of the Commission's Procedures Applicable to Negotiations, Mediation, Arbitration, Review of Agreements and Review of Statements of Generally Available Terms Pursuant to Section 252 of TA96 which requires parties filing negotiated agreements to file cost studies to support the agreements. Such request is reasonable, and the requested waiver is hereby granted. VI. Upon a review of the Agreement, the Commission finds that the Agreement meet the standards set forth in Section 252 (e) for approval by this Commission. The Agreement does not discriminate in any manner against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement nor has any telecommunications carrier made such a claim. The Agreement simply sets forth the terms and conditions of the business relationship between BellSouth and SBCT. Those terms and conditions, on their face, do not address any other' telecommunications carrier and this Commission's review has not revealed any discriminatory intent or result inherent in those terms and conditions.
View Source

Related to GROUNDS FOR REJECTION

  • Grounds for refusal Under Clause 1 of Article 1377 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation the application for grant of a patent for an industrial design shall be related to one industrial design or to a group of industrial designs associated with each other so closely as to form a single creative concept (the requirement of unity of the industrial design). This requirement is met where there is: one independent and distinct industrial design; or one industrial design and its variants differing from that industrial design by visually non-essential features and/or by color combination; or a group of industrial designs belonging to the same set of articles, as well as one or more industrial designs for separate articles belonging to the same set of articles. It is required that all industrial designs of the group shall belong to the same class of International Classification for Industrial Designs (Locarno classification). Under Clause 1 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation the essential features of an industrial design shall include features determining the aesthetic characteristics of the external appearance of the article, in particular, the shape, configuration, ornamentation, combination of colors, lines, contours of the article, texture or material of the article. The essential features of the external appearance are recognized as essential if they determine the aesthetic characteristics of the external appearance of an article, being dominant and determine the overall visual impression. The non-essential features of the external appearance include such slightly distinguishable and inexpressive features of the external appearance of an article, the exclusion of which from the set of the features of the external appearance does not lead to a change the overall visual impression (clause 72 of the Rules for the drafting, filing and examination of the documents, that are the basis for legally significant actions on the state registration of an industrial design). The claimed group of industrial designs includes: the industrial design 1: fig. 1.1 1.7; the industrial design 2: fig. 2.1 2.7; the industrial design 3: fig.

  • GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE This Agreement shall remain in effect only if the grounds for Divorce are due to the following: (check all that apply)

  • Notice of Liens Seller shall notify HARC promptly after becoming aware of any Lien on any Receivable or any Other Conveyed Property other than the conveyances hereunder.

  • Rejection State Street reserves the right to decline to process or delay the processing of a payment order which (a) is in excess of the collected balance in the account to be charged at the time of State Street’s receipt of such payment order; (b) if initiating such payment order would cause State Street, in State Street’s sole judgment, to exceed any volume, aggregate dollar, network, time, credit or similar limits upon wire transfers which are applicable to State Street; or (c) if State Street, in good faith, is unable to satisfy itself that the transaction has been properly authorized.

  • Rejection of Bids 22.1. The ACCO may reject a Bid if: 22.1.1. The Bidder is determined to be not responsible pursuant to the PPB Rules; or if 22.1.2. The Bid is determined to be non-responsive pursuant to the PPB Rules; or if 22.1.3. Any of the Bid prices for lump sum or unit items are significantly unbalanced to the potential detriment of NYCDOT. An unbalanced Bid is considered to be a Bid containing lump sum or unit item prices which do not reflect reasonable actual costs plus a reasonable proportionate share of the Bidder’s anticipated profit, overhead costs and other indirect costs anticipated for the performance of the item in question. 22.2. The ACCO may reject all Bids and may elect to re-solicit by bid or by other method authorized by the PPB Rules.