Societal Sustainability Assessment‌ Sample Clauses

Societal Sustainability Assessment‌. This performance pillar: the Sustainability Assessment Framework intends to capture the user perspective and efficacy by identifying the methodologies and tools that will support capturing feedback from all the selected and targeted stakeholders, outlining the related methodology, tools, critical indicators and target value considered under the specific viewpoint of viability and uptake of project solutions. Feedback from the relevant stakeholders will be solicited, based on questionnaires, interviews and direct discussions. This feedback will be analysed towards deriving main conclusions about the opinion of the end-users about the BEACONING solutions and overall approach. The selected assessment methodologies, tools, and critical indicators are aimed at facilitating the users’ evaluations to have measurable results. Therefore TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) and Performance Indicators Benchmarking (KPIs) are chosen based upon similar practices followed by other projects. The tools that will be used for the Societal Sustainability Assessment are selected accordingly, so as to achieve the objectives of the methodologies. The critical indicators are defined based on the measurement of the use, satisfaction, interest level and needs of the users, as well as awareness of the stakeholders. The value of measurement was defined in two folds: for the mid- term and for the final term (so that the expected progress can also be evaluated.) Methodologies: - TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), which may be adjusted in some cases: its basic concepts refer to Perceived Usefulness, Perceived ease of use, Behavioural Intention to use, Actual system use=> Experience and Attitude (acceptance) - Performance Indicators Benchmarking: a list of critical indicators is identified and it is the basis of monitoring BEACONING performance in terms of expected viability and uptake of its Tools
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Societal Sustainability Assessment‌. Operations The activities planned for societal sustainability evaluation are conducted, with Start Month 27 ORT, other WP7 partners, WP Leaders, pilots ORT coordinates activities. WP7 partners, WP Leaders, pilots contribute and cooperate End Month 32 special focus on BEACONING pilots Action 3 Analysis & Assessment of gathered data Description In this action data collected in the implementation of sustainability assessment activities, as planned in Action 2, are analysed and assessed. Assessment results are then consolidated and reported so that a decision is made on the structure that will carry out the sustainability plan beyond the project timeline. Start month M33 End Month M36 Name of the Activity Description Timeline Partners involved Responsibilities of partner involved
Sample 1

Related to Societal Sustainability Assessment‌

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Comprehensive Assessment an initial and ongoing part of the member-centered planning process employed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to identify the member’s outcomes and the services and supports needed to help support those outcomes. It includes an ongoing process of using the knowledge and expertise of the member and caregivers to collect information about:

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.