Overall Approach. The Project is being completed using a two-phased contracting approach. The Preliminary EPC Agreement (previously referred to as Phase 1) consisted of an open book phase culminating with the development of a Construction Price for the balance of engineering, construction and commissioning. The Preliminary EPC Agreement engineering scope has been substantially completed. The Work will include engineering, procurement, construction, training, startup, testing, commissioning, and turnover of the Project to Owner pursuant to the Agreement. The function, intent, and quality required of the Project are defined in the F&OR/DC, Red River Environmental Products, LLC, activated carbon production facility, Red River Parish Louisiana, Doc. No. CF-2007-016, Rev. 2, August 2008 and by the following engineering documents prepared by Contractor under the Preliminary EPC Agreement. In the event of any conflict between provisions within the F&OR/DC and the engineering deliverables listed in Attachment 1 to this appendix, the F&OR/DC shall take precedence for design, construction and interpretation.
Overall Approach. In broad terms, the approach adopted for the Evaluation of the Quality of the Objectives and Indicators of the Management Plan of DG Enterprise & Industry involved three phases: • Phase 1: Preparatory Tasks – set up meetings and various preparatory tasks including an initial survey of relevant documents, review of current objectives and indicators and the preparation of research tools, leading to an inception report; • Phase 2: Review of objectives & indicators, interviews and analysis – continuing desk research and an interview programme with Directors and other officials from DG ENTR. The submission of First Findings and Recommendations Report; • Phase 3: Further analysis and Final Report –further analysis, especially in the light of comments made by the Steering Group and from responses to the circulated draft. A Final Report was then prepared, plus an operational guidance document that can be used by desk officers for establishing and monitoring indicators. This section sets out how the investigation proceeded. It covers the following issues : • Further clarification of the nature of the Management Plan and its component elements. • The conduct of the interview programme and its results • The comparison with other Management Plans (mainly those of other DGs) • The conclusions of the analysis of the MP against SMART and RACER criteria and other background material. The evidence is set out that acts as the basis for the main conclusions and the recommendations the final sections.
Overall Approach. 6.3.3 Based on the studies carried out for Stage 1 Planning Review and South East Kowloon Development – Kai Tak Approach Channel Reclamation, in-situ techniques had been considered as the more acceptable on the ground that no dredging are required and that the handling of contaminated sediments would be minimized. It is expected that the disturbance of the heavily contaminated seabed during extensive dredging could cause the release of contaminants (particular heavy metals and organics) from the sediments to the water bodies and could pose significant adverse impacts to the surrounding environment, including KTAC, KTTS, Hoi Sham and Victoria Harbour. Furthermore, there would be environmental concerns associated with the handling, transportation and treatment of the sediment as well as risks in spilling / leaking of contaminated materials. In particular, substantial odour release is expected during extensive dredging as a result of (i) sediment disturbance, (ii) dredging contaminated sediments to barge and (iii) transportation of dredged materials to designated storage / treatment sites. Moreover, sediment texture of KTAC is generally of high water content with a layer of slurry like mixture at the surface. Dredging using conventional grab method may be ineffective and cause further disturbance and re-suspension of sediments.
Overall Approach. An awarding organisation must explain its overall approach to Centre Assessment Standards Scrutiny and how its approach (including where it uses Moderation) will ensure the standards and validity of its qualifications are maintained where assessments are marked by Centres. It must explain why its approach is appropriate for its qualifications in view of any risks that it has identified as arising from Centre marking and how it will ensure that its qualifications are manageable for Centres delivering them. It must explain how it will ensure, through its arrangements with a Centre that it is able to comply with its Conditions of Recognition in respect of assessments for that qualification.
Overall Approach. 3.1.1 The EIA Study has been conducted in accordance with the EIAO Study Brief No. ESB- 203/2009, following the guidelines on assessment methodologies in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIAO-TM).
Overall Approach. The Fund Manager will identify and respond to opportunities of investing in social upgrading activities in selected countries and sectors in a way that delivers demonstrable and sustainable impact. This is likely to involve the following steps: Proactively encouraging project proposals from commercial (global companies / retailers) and other value chain actors for undertaking social upgrading interventions. Supporting project sponsors in designing and developing robust project proposals. Providing effective support, oversight and coordination to ensure coalitions of stakeholders are developed for effective implementation of funded projects. Co-ordinating with other development partners to avoid duplication. Providing adequate support to Evaluation manager to gather data and evidence on programme outcomes and impact.
Overall Approach. Supplier will follow industry standard human resource practices to manage service related Training Services as performed for the Services. The Training Model will be set up as shown in the diagram below:
Overall Approach. During execution of the Services, Supplier will classify documents according to the procedures outlined in Health Net’s RIM process as outlined as follows: • Supplier will also identify documents that are to be archived and retained, • For paper documents, Supplier will coordinate with Health Net staff to catalog and package documents for offsite storage using Health Net’s Managed Third Party Contract with Iron Mountain or other vendor designated by Health Net, • Retrieval will be accomplished via the Iron Mountain Connect service/tool, or equivalent provided by Health Net, • For electronic documentation. Supplier will retain document files per RIM procedures. Archival and destruction will be accomplished via coordination and approval steps with and by Health Net, • The Supplier will archive Documentation consistent with RIM Procedures as well as submit request for authorization to destroy documents to the Heath Net Document Manager and execute accordingly.
Overall Approach. Supplier will support Health Net’s Enterprise Risk Management program, including applicable policies and procedures. Health Net’s risk framework will be used to define how Supplier will conduct and document risk assessments and mitigation strategies in coordination with Health Net. The framework will also be utilized to mitigate and monitor existing and emerging risks and to report such exposures, as well as mitigation plans, for visibility to appropriate stakeholders, owners, and executive leadership. Final
Overall Approach. Supplier will assign a Compliance Officer to oversee and manage the Supplier Compliance Program for Services provided under this Agreement. The Supplier Compliance Officer will manage and oversee all aspects of Compliance for delivery of the Services. The Supplier Compliance Officer will report, in a timely fashion and in conformance with timeframes established by Health Net, incidents of suspected or identified noncompliance to Health Net’s Compliance Officer. Supplier’s Compliance Officer will provide information as required by Health Net’s Compliance Officer to ensure that Health Net’s Boards of Directors are appropriately apprised of compliance issues and risks. Supplier will develop a comprehensive Compliance Plan that will be a written document describing the specific manner in which the Compliance Program elements will meet the standards for all lines of business. Specific procedures to execute the functions required of the Compliance Plan will be documented as part of the Procedures Manual. Supplier’s Compliance Plan will be reviewed and revised at least annually and align with Health Net’s compliance plans for each line of business. If there are changes in regulatory requirements or changes to Health Net and Supplier business processes, the Compliance Plan will be modified throughout the year to reflect current Laws and business practices serving as the means of documentation of record and approach to be in compliance. The Compliance Plan will also include ongoing risk assessment and issue event response procedures so the program will respond in near real time to regulatory issues that arise, and have the capability to deploy appropriate resources where and when needed. The Compliance Plan will include processes for assessing the effectiveness of the Compliance Program, through the use of effective, two-way communications self-audit, feedback mechanisms, and reporting metrics. Final Supplier will be accountable and have responsibility for ensuring compliance of all Services as of the BPaaS Services Commencement Date. Health Net will be the responsible party for performing the final interpretation of Compliance rules as they impact BPaaS operations and will provide specific requirements to Supplier’s services teams to implement within the BPaaS scope. Xxxxxx Xxxxx 0, Xxxxxxxx will support Health Net’s compliance activities and become familiar with Health Net’s compliance processes. Supplier will build controls or leverage existing controls in all o...