Special Review Panel (SRP Sample Clauses

Special Review Panel (SRP. (1) The SRP shall consist of three members, one RN selected by CNA, one RN selected by the Associate Hospital Administrator – Patient Services or her/his designee, and a third person selected by the other two panel members to serve as a neutral mediator/chairperson. The parties will make a good faith effort to select a mediator/chairperson who is experienced in the healthcare industry and with expertise in staffing in acute care hospitals. If they are unable to find such a person, they shall select am arbitrator to serve as a mediator/chairperson. Nothing shall preclude the CNA and County panel members from bringing other individuals to assist. (2) Any resolution of the SRP recommended to the Associate Hospital Administrator – Patient Services, including any recommendations by the mediator/chairperson, must take into consideration work area staffing ratio and acuity standards, and any other relevant information presented by the parties, and must be consistent with state and federal legislation prescribing levels and ratios. The SRP – including the mediator/chairperson – shall have no jurisdiction to fashion any remedy that imposes an obligation that exceeds, or is inconsistent with, the requirements of Title 22 or any other state or federal law. The Associate Hospital Administrator – Patient Services shall, within thirty days of receiving the SRP’s recommendations, accept or reject the recommendations. (3) In the event the Associate Hospital Administrator – Patient Services’ action does not resolve the matter, CNA may appeal the decision in writing to arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration article.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Special Review Panel (SRP a. The SRP shall consist of three members, one RN selected by CNA, one RN selected by the CNO or their designee, and a third person selected by the other two panel members to serve as a neutral chairperson. The parties will make a good faith effort to select a chairperson who is experienced in the healthcare industry and with expertise in staffing in acute care hospitals. If they are unable to find such a person, they shall select an arbitrator from the panel in Article 28, Arbitration, to serve as chairperson. Nothing shall preclude the CNA and UC panel members from bringing another individual to assist. b. If the SRP is unable to achieve a resolution, the neutral third party may resolve the difference and such decision shall be final. c. Any resolution of the SRP, including any decision by the neutral third party, must take into consideration work area staffing ratio and acuity standards, and any other relevant information presented by the parties, and must be consistent with state and federal legislation prescribing levels and ratios. The SRP – including the neutral third party – shall have no jurisdiction to fashion any remedy that imposes an obligation on any hospital that exceeds, or is inconsistent with, the requirements of Title 22 or any other state or federal law. Either CNA or the University may seek to vacate any decision of the SRP or of the neutral third party under any basis permitted under state (or federal) law regulating arbitration. To the extent that either party seeks to vacate a decision under this paragraph, the parties agree to waive their rights to initiate litigation or seek administrative remedies, including unfair practices under the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA), arising out of such disputes, except for information requests and matters arising under HEERA, Sections 3571 (a) and 3571.1 (b).

Related to Special Review Panel (SRP

  • Staffing Plan The Board and the Association agree that optimum class size is an important aspect of the effective educational program. The Polk County School Staffing Plan shall be constructed each year according to the procedures set forth in Board Policy and, upon adoption, shall become Board Policy.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Hospital-Association Committee (a) There shall be a Hospital-Union Committee comprised of representatives of the Hospital, one of whom shall be the Chief Nursing Officer or designate and of the Union, one of whom shall be the Bargaining Unit President or designate. The number of representatives is set out in the Appendix of Local Provisions and the membership of the Committee may be expanded by mutual agreement. (b) The Committee shall meet every two (2) months unless otherwise agreed and as required under Article 8.01 (a) (iv). The duties of chair and secretary shall alternate between the parties. Where possible, agenda items will be exchanged in writing at least five (5) calendar days prior to the meeting. A record shall be maintained of matters referred to the Committee and the recommended disposition, if any, unless agreed to the contrary. Copies of the record shall be provided to Committee members. (c) The purpose of the Committee includes: i) promoting and providing effective and meaningful communication of information and ideas, including but not limited to workload measurement tools and the promotion of best practices. Such communication may include discussion of nursing workload measurement and patient acuity systems. The Hospital will provide, upon request, information on workload measurement systems applicable to nursing currently used by the Hospital, and evaluations completed by the Hospital of such systems. ii) reviewing professional responsibility complaints with a view to identifying trends and sharing organizational successes and solutions, making joint recommendations on matters of concern including the quality and quantity of nursing care and discussing the development and implementation of quality initiatives; iii) making joint recommendations to the Chief Nursing Officer on matters of concern regarding recurring workload issues including the development of staffing guidelines, the use of agency nurses and use of overtime; iv) dealing with complaints referred to it in accordance with the provisions of Article 8, Professional Responsibility; v) discussing and reviewing matters relating to orientation and in- service programs; vi) promote the creation of full-time positions for nurses, and discuss the effect of such changes on the employment status of the nurses. This may include the impact, if any, on part-time and full-time, job sharing and retention and recruitment. (d) The Hospital agrees to pay for time spent during regular working hours for representatives of the Union attending at such meetings. (e) Where a Committee representative designated by the Union attends Committee meetings outside of her or his regularly scheduled hours, she or he will be paid for all time spent in attendance at such meetings at her or his regular straight time hourly rate of pay. Such payment shall be limited to two (2) Committee representatives per meeting.

  • Recognition of Union Stewards and Grievance Committee In order to provide an orderly and speedy procedure for the settling of grievances, the Employer acknowledges the rights and duties of the Union Stewards. The Xxxxxxx shall assist any Employee, which the Xxxxxxx represents, in preparing and presenting her grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • TRANSITION COMMITTEE A transition committee comprised of the employee representatives and the employer representatives, including the Crown, will be established by January 31, 2016 to address all matters that may arise in the creation of the Trust.

  • Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!