Common use of STAFF’S POSITION Clause in Contracts

STAFF’S POSITION. Staff reviewed the Agreement based on the standards set forth in Section 252(e)(2) of the Act. Under this Section, the Commission may only reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that (i) the agreement, or any portion thereof, discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Since this Agreement is based solely on the needs and interest of these parties, nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends that the Commission approve this agreement. In addition, Staff recommends that the Commission require SBC Illinois to file, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, with the Office of the Chief Clerk, a verified statement that the approved agreement is the same as the one as the Agreement filed in this docket with the Verified Petition. Staff also recommends that the Chief Clerk place the agreement on the Commission's web site under Interconnection Agreements. Staff's recommendations are reasonable and should be adopted.

STAFF’S POSITION. Staff reviewed the Agreement based on the standards set forth in Section 252(e)(2) of the Act. Under this Section, the Commission may only reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that (i) the agreement, or any portion thereof, discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Since this Agreement is based solely on the needs and interest of these parties, nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx recommends that the Commission approve this agreement. In addition, Staff recommends that the Commission require SBC Illinois to file, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, with the Office of the Chief Clerk, a verified statement that the approved agreement is the same as the one as the Agreement filed in this docket with the Verified Petition. Staff also recommends that the Chief Clerk place the agreement on the Commission's web site under Interconnection Agreements. Staff's recommendations are reasonable and should be adopted.

STAFF’S POSITION. Staff reviewed the Agreement based on the standards set forth in Section 252(e)(2) of the Act. Under this Section, the Commission may only reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that (i) the agreement, or any portion thereof, discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Since this Agreement is based solely on the needs and interest of these parties, nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxx recommends that the Commission approve this agreement. In addition, Staff recommends that the Commission require SBC Illinois to file, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement is approved, with the Office of the Chief Clerk, a verified statement that the approved agreement is the same as the one as the Agreement filed in this docket with the Verified Petition. Staff also recommends that the Chief Clerk place the agreement on the Commission's web site under Interconnection Agreements. Staff's recommendations are reasonable and should be adopted.

STAFF’S POSITION. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment based on the standards set forth in Section 252(e)(2) of the Act. Under this Section, the Commission may only reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that (i) the agreement, or any portion thereof, discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Since this Agreement Amendment is based solely on the needs and interest of these parties, nothing in this agreement Amendment leads me staff to the conclusion that the agreement Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends that the Commission approve this agreementAmendment. In addition, Staff recommends that the Commission require SBC Illinois to file, within five (5) days from the date upon which the Agreement Amendment is approved, with the Office of the Chief Clerk, a verified statement that the approved agreement Amendment is the same as the one as the Agreement Amendment filed in this docket with the Verified Petition. Staff also recommends that the Chief Clerk place the agreement Amendment on the Commission's web site under Interconnection Agreements. Staff's recommendations are reasonable and should be adopted.