Evaluation Activities Sample Clauses

Evaluation Activities. The evaluation process used by the committee must include the following activities: A. Completion by the probationer of required orientation activities, including reviews of (a) the duties and responsibilities of instructors, (b) guidelines for probationary review committees, and (c) departmental objectives, the probationer’s job description, and teaching and/or work assignment. B. The teaching effectiveness professional development plan (see Appendix H) or the work plan (see 811.1) includes a set of long-range and quarterly goals with supporting activities, that are mutually agreed upon by the probationer and the probationary review committee. If mutual agreement cannot be reached, the vice president of instruction will make the final decision. In cases where major revision is desired, the goals and objectives should be re-submitted for approval. It is the responsibility of the committee to determine when an adjustment requires resubmission. C. The collection and evaluation of quarterly Student Appraisals of Instruction using district evaluation forms developed under Article 803.1 or, in the case of non- teaching faculty, appraisal data collected from clients served; D. Observations of probationer teaching in classroom, lab, online, hybrid, and/or clinical settings or, for non-teaching faculty, carrying out their duties; E. Peer evaluations by the members of the probationer’s department, collected at least annually, utilizing a form mutually agreed upon by the District and the LCCFAHE. Faculty, staff, and other individuals may be added to the group participating in the probationer’s peer evaluation provided that they have sufficient interaction with the probationer, and a majority of the review committee members approve of the additions. F. Attendance at one of each of the following committee or council meetings: Curriculum Committee, Instructional Assessment Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Instructional Council, Governance Council, and the College Board of Trustees. Meeting minutes listing the probationer’s name as a guest are suggested as a method of documenting progress. G. Assessment by the probationer’s supervisor, reported at review committee meetings, reviewing general aspects of the probationer’s performance. H. An annual written self-evaluation by the probationer assessing evaluation data, summarizing progress towards goals and objectives, and summarizing actions taken or contemplated in order to address areas of concern. Additional eval...

Evaluation Activities. During the Evaluation Period BCV shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform the validation, market analysis research and other activities described in the Development Plan with respect to Licensed Products in the Field and in the Territory to evaluate the Biofuel IP in order to determine BCV’s interest in obtaining the Commercialization License.

Evaluation Activities. 8.8.1. In preparing the Professional Activity Weight form, both the faculty member and the immediate supervisor will select one (1) tenured faculty member (not to include immediate family) each to serve as Faculty Peer Reviewers. Faculty Peer Reviewers must reside in the same Department, School, or College as the faculty member being evaluated. If all tenured faculty within a College will have to complete more than four (4) peer evaluations per year the faculty member being evaluated and Xxxx may select peer reviewers from another College. 8.8.2. By May 15th, the faculty member shall submit the Professional Activities Report to the immediate supervisor and Faculty Peer Reviewers. The immediate supervisor and the Faculty Peer Reviewers will have until June 1st to complete the Professional Activities Weighting form and associated forms. 8.8.3. All material will be returned to the faculty member for preparation of the Evaluation Narrative (Appendix C5). The faculty member has until July 1st to submit the Evaluation Narrative to his or her immediate supervisor. 8.8.4. The immediate supervisor has until August 1st to generate the Summative Evaluation Report.

Evaluation Activities. All Exploration Operations carried out by Contractor in the vicinity of a Hydrocarbon Discovery to appraise the total area and importance of the discovery including, but not limited to extension or appraisal xxxxx, detailed seismic lines; geological, geochemical, gravimetric and magnetic studies; interpretation of well logs, formation tests and other data obtained from the drilling of said xxxxx. One.Three.

Evaluation Activities. To assess the viability of SCH 58500 Ad-p53 (Reference: U.S. IND #6754), MULTIVIR shall perform the following: Expression of SCH 58500 Ad-53: • Use Technology to express SCH 5800 Ad-53 for use in the Assays specified below • Procedural Ref for determination of viral particle concentration: X.X. Xxxxxxx et al, HUMAN GENE THERAPY 8:453-465 (March 1, 1997) Assays: • Adenoviral vector titer (IU/ml) • Adenoviral vector particle number (vp) concentration • p53 protein expression: dose-response. Includes adenovirus stability testing • Inhibition of cell proliferation: dose-response

Evaluation Activities. 4.1. The Participant shall make certain that the Products covered by the ASTM approval at all times conform to the ASTM Procedures and the ASTM Standard upon which the Product was approved. 4.2. Participant agrees that if it makes changes to its manufacturing process, quality control, and/or inspection procedures or changes the specifications for the Product, it will notify USDA immediately and will warrant that all future Products are still in conformance with the Program requirements to which they were tested. 4.3. If at any time ASTM is notified that the Product shall fail to conform to the processes, standards of quality, and specifications as set forth in Program and ASTM Procedures, ASTM shall so notify USDA and the Participant.

Evaluation Activities. The Provider agrees that: the Department may conduct evaluation activities for the purposes of evaluating the Services including, but not limited to: monitoring, measuring and evaluating the Services, including through Customer satisfaction surveys; the Provider being interviewed by the Department or its nominee; the Provider giving the Department or its nominee access to the Provider’s premises and records in accordance with clause 40 [Access to Premises and Records]; and it will assist the Department or its nominee in carrying out these and any other evaluation activities which the Department requires to be undertaken, including any review and final evaluation of the Services. In providing the Services, the Provider must meet the KPIs set out in Table 1 below, and the Department will measure the Provider’s performance against KPIs having regard to the following: all Providers: deliverables specified in individual Grant Agreements; each Assessment; performance audits conducted by the Department including Customer satisfaction surveys; and SWS Providers, in addition to those specified in 27.1(a), the SWS Wage Assessment Agreement.

Evaluation Activities. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Participant agrees to evaluate and test the System Equipment, System Software and Evaluation Materials using the procedures typically employed by Participant to certify and/or verify equipment and software of similar kind or functionality for use in Participant’s operations. It is understood that Participant will (i) operate the System Equipment under simulated conditions using applications commonly employed by Participant in, or in connection with, storage systems similar to the System Equipment; (ii) measure performance of the System Equipment under such simulated conditions; (iii) assess the usability and function of the System Equipment and System Software; and (iv) record such performance measurements, assessments regarding usability and function, as well as any errors or defects associated with the System Equipment and/or System Software which come to Participant’s attention and, to the extent feasible, the conditions under which such errors and/or defects occurred. Without limiting the foregoing, Participant also agrees to perform the Evaluation Activities set forth in Exhibit C.

Evaluation Activities. The University and CalSWEC may conduct compliance and program evaluation activities. In order participate and assist in these activities, Student agrees to provide the University and CalSWEC with permanent contact information, and to provide reasonable response to requests for information. _____ Student or Graduate gives consent to be contacted by the University or CalSWEC in order to carry out reasonable evaluation efforts and consents to participate in such efforts. Any personal data collected will be coded and reported out in aggregate form only and every reasonable effort will be made to safeguard Student’s privacy, consistent with applicable State law. AFFIRMATION AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION: I hereby attest that I have never been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor crime that would disqualify me from service in a county public mental health agency, or a community-based organization under contract to a county public mental health agency. I hereby attest that I have never been discharged from a county public mental health agency or a community-based organization under contract to a county public mental health agency county or other social services agency due to violation of county code/merit system rules or violation of agency or professional codes of ethics. I give the University and its selection or Awards Committee of the University permission to review my application to participate in the stipend program, and permission to review my admissions application and associated materials submitted for entrance into the MSW Program. If I request a modification of this agreement in order to complete academic or payback employment requirements, I will share relevant information about my circumstances with the University, and I give the University permission to share the information with the Mental Health Program and the Department of Mental Health. In accepting a stipend from the Mental Health Program, I hereby agree to adhere to the provisions of this Agreement. Student Name ____________________________ Student Signature __________________________ Date __________________________ Signature of Responsible Official, CSU _______________________or UC _________________, or ________________________University. Name _________________________________ Signature ______________________________ Date________________________ Position_______________________________________

Evaluation Activities. Evaluation activities are intended to measure the long-term and qualitative impacts and outcomes of programs and services for persons with disabilities cost-shared under the LMAPD. Under the previous LMAPD, the federal government funded a demonstration evaluation to assess the rationale, design and delivery processes and best practice of EAPD/LMAPD programming in Manitoba. The final EAPD/LMAPD Evaluation Summary Report was completed in June 2010 and is available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/eng/publications/evaluations/skills_and_employ ment/2010/february.shtml The marketAbilities Program (mAP) implemented revised Participant Identification Forms and Participant Closure Forms to meet the new LMAPD reporting requirements. A review of the 2015/16 mAP opening and closing forms was undertaken to identify services received and participant education and employment outcomes. In 2015/16, mAP provided services to 3,727 participants, which includes new openings, as well as those participants that opened to mAP prior to 2015/16 and who continued to receive services during the year. In 2015/16, there were also 791 case closures. Of the 791 case closures, there were 184 individuals that were supported in education and training through mAP and who earned 200 credentials. Certifications earned resulted in an increase in the number of participants with a college or bachelor degree (up from 2.9% to 12.1%) with a corresponding decrease in the number of participants with less than high school (down from 29.2% to 17.2%). As participants 31 Labour Market Agreement for Persons with Disabilities may earn more than one credential, education certifications earned may be higher than the number of participants. In addition, out of the 791 case closures, there were 405 individuals that were unemployed at time of opening, and 386 that were employed at time of opening. Of the 405 individuals unemployed at time of opening, 104 participants (25.7%) obtained 108 jobs as a result of mAP, with the majority of individuals working 30 hours/week or more (37.0%), earning $10.00- $12.00/hour (45.4%). Data of the number of individuals that were employed at time of opening and who continued to be maintained in that job while enrolled in mAP is not available. Data is available, however, on any additional employment these individuals obtained as a result of participating in the program. Of the 386 individuals that had some employment at time of opening, 180 participants (46.6%) found an additional 193...