Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about issues related to both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) 3 An allegedly damaged share might have been traded, and potentially damaged, more than once during the Class Period, and the average recovery indicated above represents the estimated average recovery for each share that allegedly incurred damages. whether the Individual Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the required level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the temporal scope of the Class Period; (iv) the amounts by which the prices of Celadon common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which factors such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of Celadon common stock during the Class Period.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Settling Parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on each claim alleged. Defendants deny that they are liable to the Class and deny that the Class has suffered any injury or damages. The issues on which the parties disagree are many, but include: (1) whether Defendants engaged in conduct that would give rise to any liability to the Class under the federal securities laws;
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Class Representatives were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of Conn’s common stock and options were allegedly artificially inflated (or deflated in the case of put options), if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which external factors, such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of Conn’s common stock and options at various times during the Class Period.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Class Representatives were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of KBR common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which external factors, such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of KBR common stock at various times during the Class Period.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the required level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of PTC common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which factors such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of PTC common stock during the Class Period.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Class Representatives were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (a) whether the 3 An allegedly damaged share or bond might have been traded more than once during the Class Period, and the average recoveries indicated above represent the estimated average for each purchase/acquisition that allegedly incurred damages. The recoveries, prices, and inflation per XXX Xxxx described in this Notice are per $1,000 par. Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (b) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or recklessness; (c) whether the Company’s securities’ prices declined because of disclosures that allegedly revealed to the market the truth about the allegedly false statements and omissions; (d) the amounts by which the prices of NII Stock and NII Bonds were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (e) the extent to which external factors, such as general market, economic and industry conditions, or unusual levels of volatility, influenced the trading prices of NII Stock and NII Bonds at various times during the Class Period. Defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing, deny that they have committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability or violation of law, and deny that Class Representatives and the Class have suffered any loss attributable to Defendants’ actions. While Class Representatives believe they have meritorious claims, they recognize that there are significant obstacles in the way to recovery.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if Plaintiffs were to prevail in the Action. Among other things, Defendants do not agree with the assertion that they violated the federal securities laws or that damages were suffered by any members of the Class as a result of their conduct.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on each claim alleged. The Defendants deny that they are liable to the Class and deny that the Class has suffered any damages.
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The parties in both Actions vigorously disagree on all elements of liability and damages, and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim alleged in the two Actions. The Defendants in both Actions deny that they are liable to plaintiffs or to Class Members and deny that the plaintiffs or Class Members have suffered any damages. The issues on which the parties disagree include, among other things: (i) whether the Defendants made any materially false or misleading statements or otherwise failed to meet any disclosure obligations during the Class Period; (ii) whether any of the alleged materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or are otherwise actionable under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Canada Business Corporations Act or Canadian common law; (iii) whether the various matters alleged in the Actions influenced the trading price of Royal Group shares at various times during the Class Period; (iv) the extent to which other factors beyond those alleged in the Actions influenced the trading price of Royal Group shares at various times during the Class Period; and (v) the appropriate model for determining whether the prices of Royal Group shares were artificially inflated during the Class Period by reason of the alleged materially false or misleading statements or omissions and the extent, if any, of such inflation.
