Statement of Potential Outcome of Case Sample Clauses

Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about issues related to both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) 3 An allegedly damaged share might have been traded, and potentially damaged, more than once during the Class Period, and the average recovery indicated above represents the estimated average recovery for each share that allegedly incurred damages. whether the Individual Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the required level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the temporal scope of the Class Period; (iv) the amounts by which the prices of Celadon common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which factors such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of Celadon common stock during the Class Period.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Class Representatives were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of KBR common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which external factors, such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of KBR common stock at various times during the Class Period.
Sample 1Sample 2
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Settling Parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on each claim alleged. Defendants deny that they are liable to the Class and deny that the Class has suffered any injury or damages. The issues on which the parties disagree are many, but include: (1) whether Defendants engaged in conduct that would give rise to any liability to the Class under the federal securities laws;
Sample 1Sample 2
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Class Representatives were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of Conn’s common stock and options were allegedly artificially inflated (or deflated in the case of put options), if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which external factors, such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of Conn’s common stock and options at various times during the Class Period.
Sample 1Sample 2
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim asserted against Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether Defendants made any statements or omitted any facts that were materially false or misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) whether any such allegedly materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the required level of intent or recklessness; (iii) the amounts by which the prices of PTC common stock were allegedly artificially inflated, if at all, during the Class Period; and (iv) the extent to which factors such as general market, economic and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of PTC common stock during the Class Period.
Sample 1Sample 2
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The parties disagree on both liability and damages with respect to the claims asserted by Lead Plaintiffs against Defendants in the Action, and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable by Authorized Claimants if the Action were to continue to be 2 An allegedly damaged share might have been traded more than once during the Class Period, and the indicated average recovery would be the total for all purchasers of that share. litigated and Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim alleged. The issues on which the parties disagree include (a) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were materially false, misleading, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (b) whether Defendants had the requisite scienter when the statements were made or facts were allegedly omitted; (c) whether loss causation and damages could be established; (d) the extent to which the various matters that Lead Plaintiffs alleged were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading price of WMI common stock at various times during the Class Period; (e) the extent to which the various allegedly adverse material facts that Lead Plaintiffs alleged were omitted influenced (if at all) the trading price of WMI common stock at various times during the Class Period; (f) the appropriate economic model for determining the amount by which WMI common stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period;
Sample 1
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The parties in both Actions vigorously disagree on all elements of liability and damages, and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim alleged in the two Actions. The Defendants in both Actions deny that they are liable to plaintiffs or to Class Members and deny that the plaintiffs or Class Members have suffered any damages. The issues on which the parties disagree include, among other things: (i) whether the Defendants made any materially false or misleading statements or otherwise failed to meet any disclosure obligations during the Class Period; (ii) whether any of the alleged materially false or misleading statements or omissions were made with the requisite level of intent or are otherwise actionable under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Canada Business Corporations Act or Canadian common law; (iii) whether the various matters alleged in the Actions influenced the trading price of Royal Group shares at various times during the Class Period; (iv) the extent to which other factors beyond those alleged in the Actions influenced the trading price of Royal Group shares at various times during the Class Period; and (v) the appropriate model for determining whether the prices of Royal Group shares were artificially inflated during the Class Period by reason of the alleged materially false or misleading statements or omissions and the extent, if any, of such inflation.
Sample 1
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on each claim alleged. The Defendants deny that they are liable to the Class and deny that the Class has suffered any damages.
Sample 1
Statement of Potential Outcome of Case. The Parties do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if Plaintiffs were to prevail in the Action. Among other things, Defendants do not agree with the assertion that they violated the federal securities laws or that damages were suffered by any members of the Class as a result of their conduct.
Sample 1

Related to Statement of Potential Outcome of Case

  • STATEMENT OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Minnesota and the Union are committed to recognizing and acknowledging the healthy and positive diversity that we have on the University campuses. Further, the parties recognize that all employees have the right to work in a productive environment in which there is no verbal or physical intimidation, or discrimination or harassment based on the criteria provided in Section 1, Discrimination Prohibition, and Section 2, Sexual Harassment. It is in this spirit that the parties agree to the provisions of this Article. This statement shall not be grievable nor shall either party use this Section as evidence or argument in arbitration.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • Background and Narrative of Budget Reductions 2. Assumptions Used in the Deficit Reduction Plan: - EBF and Estimated New Tier Funding: - Equal Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates: - Employee Salaries and Benefits: - Short and Long Term Borrowing: - Educational Impact: - Other Assumptions: - Has the district considered shared services or outsourcing (Ex: Transportation, Insurance) If yes please explain:

  • Introduction and Statement of Policy The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has established NIH-designated data repositories (e.g., database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), Sequence Read Archive (SRA), NIH Established Trusted Partnerships) for securely storing and sharing controlled-access human data submitted to NIH under the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS)

  • Withdrawal of Property from Market or Termination of Discussions Potential Investor acknowledges that the Property has been offered for sale subject to withdrawal of the Property from the market at any time or rejection of any offer because of the terms thereof, or for any other reason whatsoever, without notice, as well as the termination of discussions with any party at any time without notice for any reason whatsoever.

  • Statement of Policy The Employer shall issue and make available to the Union a statement of policy in respect to leaves of absence and any other assistance which it may make available to Employees who desire to seek leave for educational purposes.

  • Happen After We Receive Your Letter When we receive your letter, we must do two things:

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.