Supervisor’s recommendation Sample Clauses

Supervisor’s recommendation. The immediate supervisor shall provide the faculty member a written assessment in accordance with Article 22. In addition, the immediate supervisor shall provide a proposed tenure recommendation to the faculty member. After receipt of a proposed negative recommendation, the faculty member shall be given the opportunity to meet with the immediate supervisor. The final recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member. The faculty member may submit a written response to the Vice President regarding the immediate supervisor’s recommendation. This response becomes part of the applicant’s tenure file.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (26)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Supervisor’s recommendation. If the probationary employee has not been previously removed from probation, the evaluator shall submit a written report to the Superintendent not later than May 1. The written report shall indicate the employee's performance during the probationary period and contain a recommended course of action to be taken by the Superintendent. The probationary employee shall be given a copy of the report.
Sample 1Sample 2
Supervisor’s recommendation. The immediate supervisor shall provide the faculty member a written assessment in accordance with Article 22. , Section D, In addition, the immediate supervisor and subsequently shall provide a proposed tenure recommendation to the faculty member. supervising Vice President. After receipt of a proposed negative recommendation, the faculty member shall be given the opportunity to meet with the immediate supervisor. The final recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member. The recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member in accordance with Article 5, Section A. The faculty member may submit a written response to the Vice President regarding the immediate supervisor’s recommendation. This response becomes part of the applicant’s tenure file. The faculty member is entitled to attach comments to the recommendation.
Sample 1
Supervisor’s recommendation. The above named officer is / is not recommended for ORSP. I certify that his/her performance is satisfactory and that he/she is not in an internship or initial residency program. (Signature) (Printed Name) DATE The above named officer is / is not recommended for ORSP payment. (Signature) (Printed Name) DATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Commissioned Corps Privacy Act Statement for Public Health Service Commissioned Corps "Optometrist Retention Special Pay (ORSP) Agreement Form PHS-7040 (08/2004) Authority: This statement is provided pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). Our authority to collect this information is 42 U.S.C. 202 et seq. and Executive Order 9397, "Numbering System for Federal Accounts Relating to Individual Persons." Principal Purpose: This information is used by the Department of Health and Human Services to record a Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps officer’s eligibility to receive ORSP. If you are selected for award of ORSP, the information collected will be used for issuance of personnel orders to authorize payment. These records, or information therefrom, may also be provided to other Federal Agencies to which Corps optometry officers are assigned. The information also may be used for study purposes and/or collection of statistical data for reports to other Federal Agencies and the Congress. It may also be used for other lawful purposes including collection of a debt owed the Federal Government, law enforcement, and litigation. Routine Uses: Information may be provided to the Internal Revenue Service to resolve matters relating to an individual’s tax withholding; to the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board to establish eligibility for contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan for Uniformed Service personnel; and to the Department of Justice or State and local governments when a question of conflicting interest is raised concerning a member’s eligibility for and payment of bonuses. Information Regarding Disclosure of Your Social Security Number (SSN): Under Executive Order 9397, Agencies are required to use the SSN as a means of identifying individuals in Agency personnel information systems. Solicitation of your SSN is authorized by this order so that Agencies, by being able to identify you, can ensure that the data furnished is accurately recorded for each employee in the personnel system. It will be used for this purpose only.
Sample 1

Related to Supervisor’s recommendation

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION This agreement formalizes the mechanism that may be used by the City to transfer civil rights complaints to the Iowa Civil Rights Commission for investigation. ICRC will compensate the City for acting as the intake agent under this agreement. The City and ICRC have maintained this arrangement for several years. Transferring this time- consuming investigation responsibility to the ICRC will allow the Ames Human Relations Commission more time to devote to proactive educational projects in the community. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as described above.

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • Representations and Recommendations Unless otherwise stated in writing, neither Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc, nor its brokers or licensees have made, on their own behalf, any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to any element of the Property including but not limited to, the legal sufficiency, legal effect, or tax consequences of this transaction. Any information furnished by either party should be independently verified before that party relies on such information. Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc. recommends that Buyer consult its attorneys and accountants before signing this Agreement regarding the terms and conditions herein and that Seller satisfy itself as to the financial ability of Buyer to perform.

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • Decision of the Board The decision of the majority shall be the decision of the Board. Where there is no majority decision, the decision of the Chairperson shall be the decision of the Board. The decision of the Board of Arbitration shall be final, binding and enforceable on all parties, and may not be changed. The Board of Arbitration shall not have the power to change this Agreement or to alter, modify or amend any of its provisions. However, the Board shall have the power to dispose of a grievance by any arrangement which it deems just and equitable.

  • Supervisors Supervisors may continue to perform bargaining unit work which is incidental to their jobs. They may also perform bargaining unit work in emergency situations and where such work is necessary to train a covered member. Such work by supervisors may result from but shall not cause any layoffs of covered members.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.