We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

– SYSTEM AUDIT Sample Clauses

– SYSTEM AUDIT. The certification audit consists of the document review and of the on-site audit by the auditor(s) nominated by CVI. The degree of conformity of the system and the system standard is assessed. The client can appeal against the audit team nominated by XXX. To be valid, the appeal has to be written and submitted within eight days after the names of auditors are announced in writing to the client by CVI. In such a case, CVI has to nominate new auditor(s) and is authorised to change the date of the audit. After the audit, CVI shall submit to the client the list of nonconformities and observations with the corrective action(s) request and the audit report. The client binds to propose and carry out corrective action(s) without undue delay and CVI shall assess whether the content and the term for carrying them out is acceptable. CVI can decide to perform a follow-up audit of implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions which shall be performed within 6 months of identifying serious nonconformities. Such an audit represents minimum 1/2–day audit.
– SYSTEM AUDIT. The certification audit consists of the document review and of the audit in situ by the auditor(s) nominated by TQM. The degree of conformity of the system and the system standard is assessed. The client can appeal against the auditors nominated by TQM. To be valid, the appeal has to be written and submitted within eight days after the names of auditors are announced in writing to the client by TQM. In such a case, TQM has to nominate new auditor(s) and is authorised to change the date of the audit. After the audit, TQM shall submit to the client the list of nonconformities and observations with the corrective action(s) request and the audit report. The client / organisation binds to propose and carry out corrective action(s) without undue delay and TQM shall assess whether the content and the term for carrying them out is acceptable. In some cases TQM can decide to perform an extraordinary audit of implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions. This assessment represents minimum 1/2 – day audit.
– SYSTEM AUDIT. The certification audit consists of the document review and of the audit in situ by the auditor(s) nominated by CVI. The degree of conformity of the system and the system standard is assessed. The client can appeal against the auditors nominated by CVI. To be valid, the appeal has to be written and submitted within eight days after the names of auditors are announced in writing to the client by CVI. In such a case, CVI has to nominate new auditor(s) and is authorised to change the date of the audit. After the audit, CVI shall submit to the client the list of nonconformities and observations with the corrective action(s) request and the audit report. The client / organisation binds to propose and carry out corrective action(s) without undue delay and CVI shall assess whether the content and the term for carrying them out is acceptable. CVI can decide to perform a follow-up audit of implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions within 3 months of identifying serious nonconformities. Such an audit represents minimum 1/2–day audit.
– SYSTEM AUDIT. The PatientCare 360 Audit Trail enabling service generates a record of the users who have accessed which files and when. The enabling service also makes note of any attempts to access the system from an unauthorized terminal, the use of an expired username or password, unusual numbers of password attempts, and other potential attempted violations of security policies. An audit is kept of every transaction in PatientCare 360. The audit process documents every step in the information exchange process, whether the transaction is discarded (because the receiver did not want the information), who it was sent to, when it was sent and received, what happened to the data upon receipt (examples: printed, viewed, or acknowledged by an EHR interface). The original message as it was received, along with the message as it was transformed for delivery to the practice (such as to an EHR) is kept in the audit. This information is available to the CORHIO administrative user(s) as well as to each participant that received the message. A record shall be maintained that records all assigning of access permissions as well as updates and deactivations. All security vulnerabilities are reviewed by both the CORHIO Security Response Team and XXXXXX’s vendor, Medicity. Based on these reviews, XXXXXX and Medicity will mutually identify which vulnerabilities require remediation or correction. Medicity will then remediate or correct those vulnerabilities identified as directed by and agreed with XXXXXX. Medicity will provide evidence of completion of each task, subject to verification by XXXXXX.
– SYSTEM AUDIT. The certification audit consists of the document review and of the audit in situ by the auditor(s) nominated by QRS EGYPT. The degree of conformity of the system and the system standard is assessed. The client can appeal against the auditors nominated by QRS EGYPT. To be valid, the appeal has to be written and submitted within eight days after the names of auditors are announced in writing to the client by QRSEGYPT. In such a case, QRS EGYPT has to nominate new auditor(s) and is authorised to change the date of the audit. After the audit, QRS EGYPT shall submit to the client the list of nonconformities and observations with the corrective action(s) request and the audit report. The client / organisation binds to propose and carry out corrective action(s) without undue delay and QRS EGYPT shall assess whether the content and the term for carrying them out is acceptable. In some cases QRS EGYPT can decide to perform an extraordinary audit of implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions. This assessment represents minimum 1/2 – day audit.
– SYSTEM AUDIT. 10.1 From time to time, the Commission will perform maintenance activities and conduct audits of the use of VIRRGIN and the Materials. Except in cases of urgency, the Commission shall give no less than 24 hours notice that maintenance affecting the performance or availability of VIRRGIN is to be performed.

Related to – SYSTEM AUDIT

  • SAO AUDIT A. The state auditor may conduct an audit or investigation of any entity receiving funds from the state directly under the Contract or indirectly through a subcontract under the Contract. The acceptance of funds directly under the Contract or indirectly through a subcontract under the Contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor, under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. Under the direction of the legislative audit committee, an entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation by the state auditor must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers relevant to the investigation or audit. B. Grantee shall comply with any rules and procedures of the state auditor in the implementation and enforcement of Section 2262.154 of the Texas Government Code.

  • Records; Audit VIVUS shall maintain complete and accurate books and records in accordance with GAAP in sufficient detail to permit Purchaser to confirm the accuracy of the Manufacturing Costs, and any other financial measure relating to the Price of the Product payable under this Agreement, for a period of *** from the creation of individual records or any longer period required by Applicable Law. At Purchaser’s request, such records shall be available for review at a Purchaser’s headquarters located at 00 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 0xx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxx 00000, or a mutually agreeable location determined by Parties not more than once each calendar year (during normal business hours on a mutually agreed date with reasonable advance notice) by an independent Third Party auditor selected by Purchaser and approved by VIVUS (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) and subject to confidentiality and non-use obligations no less stringent than those set forth in Article 11 of the License Agreement for the sole purpose of verifying for Purchaser the accuracy of the Manufacturing Costs and Price paid by Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement or of any payments made by Purchaser to VIVUS pursuant to this Agreement. Any such auditor shall not disclose VIVUS’ Confidential Information to Purchaser, except to the extent such disclosure is necessary to verify the accuracy of the financial reports furnished by VIVUS or the amount of payments due by VIVUS under this Agreement. Any undisputed amounts finally determined to be owed but unpaid shall be paid within *** from the accountant’s report. Any amounts finally determined to have been overpaid will either be refunded to Purchaser or credited to Purchaser against future payments to VIVUS hereunder, at Purchaser’s option. Purchaser shall bear the full cost of such audit unless such audit reveals an underpayment or under-reporting error of *** percent (***%) or more during the applicable audit period, in which case VIVUS shall bear the full cost of such audit.

  • Inspection & Audit Contractor agrees that the relevant books, records (written, electronic, computer related or otherwise), including, without limitation, relevant accounting procedures and practices of Contractor or its subcontractors, financial statements and supporting documentation, and documentation related to the work product shall be subject, at any reasonable time, to inspection, examination, review, audit, and copying at any office or location of Contractor where such records may be found, with or without notice by the City, and with regard to any federal funding, the relevant federal agency, the Comptroller General, the General Accounting Office, the Office of the Inspector General, or any of their authorized representatives. All subcontracts shall reflect the requirements of this paragraph.

  • OIG INSPECTION, AUDIT, AND REVIEW RIGHTS ‌ In addition to any other rights OIG may have by statute, regulation, or contract, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may conduct interviews, examine or request copies of Xxxxxx’x books, records, and other documents and supporting materials and/or conduct on-site reviews of any of Xxxxxx’x locations for the purpose of verifying and evaluating: (a) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the terms of this IA and (b) Xxxxxx’x compliance with the requirements of the Federal health care programs. The documentation described above shall be made available by Xxxxxx to OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) at all reasonable times for inspection, audit, and/or reproduction. Furthermore, for purposes of this provision, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may interview Xxxxxx and any of Xxxxxx’x employees or contractors who consent to be interviewed at the individual’s place of business during normal business hours or at such other place and time as may be mutually agreed upon between the individual and OIG. Xxxxxx shall assist OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) in contacting and arranging interviews with such individuals upon OIG’s request. Xxxxxx’x employees and contractors may elect to be interviewed with or without a representative of Xxxxxx present.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Auditor Report; Right to Audit (a) Within the time period permitted for the examination audit pursuant to 12 CFR Section 363 after the end of each fiscal year during which the Receiver makes any payment to the Assuming Institution under this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement, the Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver a report signed by its independent public accountants stating that they have reviewed the terms of this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and that, in the course of their annual audit of the Assuming Institution’s books and records, nothing has come to their attention suggesting that any computations required to be made by the Assuming Institution during such fiscal year pursuant to this Article II were not made by the Assuming Institution in accordance herewith. In the event that the Assuming Institution cannot comply with the preceding sentence, it shall promptly submit to the Receiver corrected computations together with a report signed by its independent public accountants stating that, after giving effect to such corrected computations, nothing has come to their attention suggesting that any computations required to be made by the Assuming Institution during such year pursuant to this Article II were not made by the Assuming Institution in accordance herewith. In such event, the Assuming Institution and the Receiver shall make all such accounting adjustments and payments as may be necessary to give effect to each correction reflected in such corrected computations, retroactive to the date on which the corresponding incorrect computation was made. (b) The Assuming Institution shall perform on an annual basis an internal audit of its compliance with the provisions of this Article II and shall provide the Receiver and the Corporation with copies of the internal audit reports and access to internal audit workpapers related to such internal audit. (c) The Receiver or the FDIC in its corporate capacity (“Corporation”), its contractors and their employees, and its agents may perform an audit or audits to determine the Assuming Institution’s compliance with the provisions of this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement, including this Article II, by providing not less than ten (10) Business Days’ prior written notice. Assuming Institution shall provide access to pertinent records and proximate working space in Assuming Institution’s facilities. The scope and duration of any such audit shall be within the reasonable discretion of the Receiver or the Corporation, but shall in no event be administered in a manner that unreasonably interferes with the operation of the Assuming Institution’s business. The Receiver or the Corporation, as the case may be, shall bear the expense of any such audit. In the event that any corrections are necessary as a result of such an audit or audits, the Assuming Institution and the Receiver shall make such accounting adjustments and payments as may be necessary to give retroactive effect to such corrections.

  • Records; Audits Merck will keep, and will cause each of the other Selling Parties, as applicable, to keep, and Moderna will keep, adequate books and records of accounting for the purpose of calculating all royalties and other amounts payable by either Party to the other Party hereunder and ensuring each Party’s compliance hereunder. For the [***] following the end of the Calendar Year to which each will pertain, such books and records of accounting (including those of its Affiliates, as applicable) will be kept at each of their principal place of business. At the request of either Party, the other Party will permit (and procure its Affiliates, to permit) an independent certified public accounting firm of internationally recognized standing selected by the auditing Party and reasonably acceptable to the other Party to have access during normal business hours to such of the records as may be reasonably necessary to verify the accuracy of the payments due hereunder for any Calendar Year ending not more than [***] following the end of any Calendar Year. Such examinations may not be conducted more than once in any Calendar Year or be repeated for any Calendar Year. The accounting firm shall disclose to the auditing Party only whether the reports are correct or incorrect and the amount of any discrepancy. No other Confidential Information shall be provided. If such accounting firm correctly identifies a discrepancy made during such period, the appropriate Party shall pay the other Party the amount of the discrepancy within [***] of the date of delivery of such accounting firm’s written report so correctly concluding, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Parties. The fees charged by such accounting firm shall be paid by the auditing Party, provided that if the underpayment or overcharge exceeds [***], the audited Party shall pay the fees. Upon the expiration of [***] following the end of any Calendar Year, absent willful misconduct or fraud by a Party (its Affiliates, as applicable) the calculation of amounts payable with respect to such Calendar Year shall be binding and conclusive upon the Parties, and the Parties shall be released from any liability or accountability with respect to amounts payable for such Calendar Year. The auditing Party shall treat all financial information subject to review under this Section 8.6(c) in accordance with the confidentiality and non-use provisions of this Agreement, and shall cause its accounting firm to enter into an acceptable confidentiality agreement with the audited Party obligating it to retain all such Confidential Information in confidence pursuant to such confidentiality agreement.