Technical Verification Review Success Criteria Sample Clauses

Technical Verification Review Success Criteria. The data presented at the TVR shall be assessed and a determination made on the readiness of the Chipset/S-BSS to enter the Operational Verification Phase. The following criteria shall be met. An assessment that the Chipset/S-BSS is ready for Operational Verification must be made to successfully complete the TVR. - All technical specifications required for the release met. - Chipset and S-BSS operate together to provide the communications functionality specified - All revenue impacting problem reports closed. - Mutually agreed work off plan for all open problem reports
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Technical Verification Review Success Criteria. The data presented at the TVR will be assessed and a determination made on the readiness of the S-BSS to enter the Operational Verification Phase. The following criteria shall be met. . [***] At Completion of each TVR TerreStar will approve the TVT results or will notify the Contractor in writing of any non-conformances with applicable specifications. Contractor will promptly correct such nonconformity and shall notify TerreStar that the corrections are ready for retest. Upon successful completion of such retest, TerreStar will give its approval. Upon non-successful completion, this process shall repeat. In the event TerreStar fails to provide such written notice within ten (10) days after completion of the TVR, TerreStar will be deemed to have given its approval of TVR.

Related to Technical Verification Review Success Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Acceptance Testing The MCP must have the capability to report all elements in the Minimum Data Set as set forth in the ODJFS Encounter Data Specifications and must submit a test file in the ODJFS-specified medium in the required formats prior to contracting or prior to an information systems replacement or update. Acceptance testing of encounter data is required as specified in Section 29(a)(v) of this Appendix.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Protocol (cc) Part 2(b) of the ISDA Schedule – Payee Representation.

  • Performance Review The Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis and will make adjustments to salary or other compensation, as they deem appropriate in their sole and absolute discretion.

  • Commercialization Reports After the First Commercial Sale of a Licensed Product anywhere in the Territory, LICENSEE shall submit to Cornell semi-annual reports on or before each February 28 and August 31 of each year. Each report shall cover LICENSEE’s (and each Affiliate’s and Sublicensee’s) most recently completed calendar half-year and shall show:

  • Product Testing Upon request, Customer shall provide Operator a laboratory report for each Product delivery by Customer or Customer’s supplier. Operator will not be obligated to receive Contaminated Product for throughput through the Pipelines, nor will Operator be obligated to accept Product that fails to meet the applicable quality specifications for the Berths under the BAUTA and any Terminal Service Orders issued thereunder.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.