Technology Access Clause. (a) PSP expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, PSP represents and warrants to TFC that the technology provided to TFC for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. (b) For purposes of this Section, the phrase “equivalent access” means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assistive devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the Americans With Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives to mouse commands and other means of navigating graphical displays, and customizable display appearance.
Technology Access Clause. Contractor expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, Contractor represents and warrants to Agency that the technology provided to Agency for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: • providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; • presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non- visual use; and • being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. For purposes of this Section, the phrase "equivalent access" means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assistive devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the Americans With Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives to mouse commands and other means of navigating graphical displays, and customizable display appearance. In accordance with Section 2157.005 of the Texas Government Code, the Technology Access Clause contract provision remains in effect for any contract entered into before September 1, 2006.
Technology Access Clause. (a) Contractor expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, Contractor represents and warrants to TFC that the technology provided to TFC for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired.
Technology Access Clause. (a) PSP expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, PSP represents and warrants to TFC that the technology provided to TFC for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired.
Technology Access Clause. Seller expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairments. Accordingly, the Seller represents and warrants to SHSU that the technology provided to SHSU for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: • providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; • presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non- visual use; and • being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. For purposes of this paragraph, the phrase “equivalent access” means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assistive devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives Seller represents and warrants (the Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility Warranty”) that the electronic and information resources and all associated information, documentation and support that it provides to SHSU under the Agreement (collectively, the “EIRs”) comply with the applicable requirements set forth in Title 1, Chapter 213 of the Texas Administrative Code (“TAC”) and Title 1, Chapter 206, Rule §206.70 of the TAC (as authorized by Chapter 2054, Subchapter M of the Texas Government Code). Accordingly Seller represents and warrants to SHSU that the EIR provided to SHSU complies with the accessibility requirements as outlined in TAC 206 and 213 by providing (1) a completed Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) attesting to the EIR’s accessible features and capabilities or (2) providing a similarly formatted document as the VPAT attesting to the EIR’s accessible features and capabilities. To the extent Seller becomes aware that the EIRs, or any portion thereof, do not comply with the EIR Accessibility Warranty, then Seller represents and warrants that it wi...
Technology Access Clause. The vendor expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of information technology unless that system meets certain requirements consistent with the University technology policy standards relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairments. Accordingly, the vendor represents and warrants to the University that the technology provided to University for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: (1) providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; (2) presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and (3) being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. For purpose of this paragraph, the phrase “equivalent access” means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assisting devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the American with Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives to mouse commands and other means of navigating graphical displays, and customizable display appearance. If requested, the vendor must provide a detailed plan for making this purchase accessible and/or a validation of concept demonstration.
Technology Access Clause. Service Provider expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, Service Provider represents and warrants to TJJD that the technology provided to TJJD for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of:
Technology Access Clause. (a) Contractor expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairment. Accordingly, Contractor represents and warrants to TFC that the technology provided to TFC for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. (b) For purposes of this Section, the phrase “equivalent access” means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assistive devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the Americans With Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives to mouse commands and other means of navigating graphical displays, and customizable display appearance. Except as expressly amended above, all provisions, terms and conditions of the Contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect. In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have made and executed this Amendment No. 4 to the Contract to be effective as of December 1, 2021. TEXAS FACILITIES COMMISSION TEXAS DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC. By: By: Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Executive Director Governmental Account Representative Approved: Xxx Xxxxxxx Legal Counsel CM/Xxxx Xxxxxx
Technology Access Clause. A. Effective September 1, 2006 state agencies and institutions of higher education shall procure products which comply with the State of Texas Accessibility requirements for Electronic and Information Resources specified in Texas Administrative Code, Part 1, Chapter 213, when such products are available in the commercial marketplace or when such products are developed in response to a procurement solicitation.
Technology Access Clause. The Respondent expressly acknowledges that State funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairments. Accordingly, the Respondent represents and warrants to the qualified ordering entity that the technology provided to the qualified ordering entity for purchase is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of:
