Common use of Tenured Faculty Evaluation Clause in Contracts

Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process 1. Self-evaluation a. The faculty member will submit to the Xxxx a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances) awards and achievements; appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and other pertinent documents. 2. Instructional activity observation a. The appropriate Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: i. The faculty member and Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions displaying his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member will present the course to the evaluator during an observation lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 3. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Xxxx’x office, and be conducted in each class during the fall and spring semesters, or for those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, during the academic year in which the evaluation is conducted. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file. 4. Report preparation a. The Xxxx will complete a Faculty Performance Evaluation report, including a recommendation of continued employment, based upon: i. the materials from the faculty portfolio; ii. results of observations; iii. items relevant to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including adherence to Board Policy and college processes and deadlines; iv. a review of activities which are outside of the instructional duties, including those defined within Board Policy; v. information regarding participation in curriculum development and review, and in development and assessment of student learning outcomes. Any information included in the faculty member’s evaluation regarding participation in curriculum or student learning outcome processes must be verified and documented. b. Faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. c. Evaluations are to be based on the materials described in this Article. Hearsay statements, rumors or information from anonymous sources shall be excluded from written evaluations. The Xxxx may include in the written evaluation information which has been documented through a completed investigation subsequent to a complaint, the findings of which investigation have been delivered to the faculty member under evaluation prior to the inclusion of this information in the evaluation report. 5. A faculty member may also elect to have a second evaluation by a tenured faculty member of his/her choice. This second evaluation is intended for improvement of faculty members and it may become a part of the personnel file only at the request of the faculty member being evaluated.

Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The 1. At the end of each consecutive five years following a tenure appointment, a Tenure Review Committee (whose membership is described in Xxxxxxx X,X,0,x) shall be appointed as appropriate for each tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process 1. Self-evaluation a. The faculty member will submit to the Xxxx a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances) awards and achievements; appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and other pertinent documentsmember. 2. Instructional activity observation a. The appropriate Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: i. The Once a faculty member and Xxxx or designee has been reviewed they will mutually agree on be subject to additional reviews at the course(s) or equivalent in which beginning of the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that sixth academic year since the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions displaying his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member will present the course to the evaluator during an observation lasting at least fifty (50) minuteslast review. 3. Student EvaluationDuring the sixth year of tenured appointment, the committee shall review the performance of the tenured faculty member. This review shall consist of: a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Xxxx’x office, and be conducted in each class Classroom visitations by all committee members at least once during the fall and spring semesters, or for those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, during the academic year in which the evaluation is conductedreview year. b. These student evaluations Evaluations by students as specified in Section C (3) (b) . c. Discussions with the Tenure Review Committee and the Xxxx concerning overall faculty performance. 4. By May 1 of each year the Committee will recommend either satisfactory performance without reservation or satisfactory performance with reservation. Committee recommendations shall be made available for conveyed to the Xxxx and faculty members. a. A recommendation of satisfactory performance without reservation completes the review process. b. Satisfactory performance with reservation shall be accompanied with a projected development plan designated to overcome the deficiencies identified in the evaluation. 5. Tenured faculty identified as being deficient will meet with the Division/Department Chairperson, Xxxx, or other appropriate personnel to overcome deficiencies. a. During the seventh year, the Tenure Review Committee will continue evaluation of the tenured faculty member's progress. b. At the end of the seventh consecutive year, the Tenure Review Committee will once again evaluate the performance of the faculty member to reviewas satisfactory performance without reservation or satisfactory performance with reservation. c. The student evaluations are In situations of a recommendation of satisfactory performance without reservation, the property review is complete. In situations of satisfactory performance with reservation, the faculty member, and will be returned to the tenured faculty member is notified by July 1 that he/she is receiving one year's formal notice, at the end of which time the semester, and the information contained therein individual's contract will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel filecontinued. 4. Report preparation a. d. The Xxxx will complete a Faculty Performance Evaluation report, including a recommendation of continued employment, based upon: i. the materials from the faculty portfolio; ii. results of observations; iii. items relevant President may choose to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including adherence to Board Policy and college processes and deadlines; iv. a establish an additional probationary period during which time further review of activities which are outside of the instructional duties, including those defined within Board Policy; v. information regarding participation in curriculum development and review, and in development and assessment of student learning outcomes. Any information included in the faculty member’s evaluation regarding participation in curriculum or student learning outcome processes must be verified and documentedis possible. b. Faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. c. Evaluations are to be based on the materials described e. Nothing in this Article. Hearsay statements, rumors or information from anonymous sources shall be excluded from written evaluations. The Xxxx may include in section precludes the written evaluation information which has been documented through a completed investigation subsequent to a complaint, the findings of which investigation have been delivered to the faculty member under evaluation prior to the inclusion of this information in the evaluation report. 5. A faculty member may also elect to have a second evaluation by a tenured faculty member from filing a formal grievance of his/her choice. This second evaluation is intended for improvement of faculty members and it may become a part of the personnel file only at the request of the faculty member being evaluatedseeking legal assistance.

Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process 1. Self-evaluation a. The faculty member will submit to the Xxxx a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances) awards and achievements; appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and other pertinent documents. 2. Instructional activity observation a. The appropriate Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: i. The faculty member and Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions displaying his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member will present the course to the evaluator during an observation lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 3. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Xxxx’x office, and be conducted in each class during the fall and spring semesters, or for those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, during the academic year in which the evaluation is conducted. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file. 4. Report preparation a. The Xxxx will complete a Faculty Performance Evaluation report, including a recommendation of continued employment, based upon: i. the materials from the faculty portfolio; ii. results of observations; iii. items relevant to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including adherence to Board Policy and college processes and deadlines; iv. a review of activities which are outside of the instructional duties, including those defined within Board Policy; v. information regarding participation in curriculum development and review, and in development and assessment of student learning outcomes. Any information included in the faculty member’s evaluation regarding participation in curriculum or student learning outcome processes must be verified and documented. b. Faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. c. Evaluations are to be based on the materials described in this Article. Hearsay statements, rumors or information from anonymous sources shall be excluded from written evaluations. The Xxxx xxxx may include in the written evaluation information which has been documented through a completed investigation subsequent to a complaint, the findings of which investigation have been delivered to the faculty member under evaluation prior to the inclusion of this information in the evaluation report. 5. A faculty member may also elect to have a second evaluation by a tenured faculty member of his/her choice. This second evaluation is intended for improvement of faculty members and it may become a part of the personnel file only at the request of the faculty member being evaluated.