Procedures for the Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Procedures for the Evaluation Process. All tenured professors will be engaged in a 5-year evaluation process outlined in Article 5 of this contract. The procedure will include evaluation and observation tools developed by the College and approved by the Federation. The process will take place between the tenured professor and their designated administrator. Each professor must complete a comprehensive self-reflection every five years that incorporates information from the following: • Student evaluations from a minimum of three classes during the five-year cycle. • Peer observations conducted by at least three members of the tenured professor’s Teaching Excellence Community (TEC) within the five-year cycle. • Data analysis and trends related to course and/or program student success outcomes over the five-year cycle. • Learning insights based on goals outlined in the annual professional development plan (PDP) during the five-year cycle. Administrators will evaluate the tenured professor’s performance, including instruction, service work, professional development, and other contributions to the college at the end of the five-year cycle. The administrator will include their observation of one of the professor’s classes. The professor will meet with their administrator and review the administrator’s evaluations. The professor may respond to the end-of-cycle evaluation in writing for the personnel record. The five- year self-reflection and administrator evaluation, with professor response if added, will be placed in the tenured professor’s personnel file at the conclusion of the five- year cycle. An annual check-in with the professor’s administrator is required to ensure that the professor is meeting professional development goals and receiving support from peers and college administration. They will also discuss plans for evaluations and observations the following year. The evaluation and observation forms gathered for the administrator and self- reflection process will be kept in the supervisor’s administrative file for a maximum of five years. The five-year cycle schedule will be maintained by the administrator’s staff and reviewed annually by the faculty and administrator as part of the year-end work review and planning process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procedures for the Evaluation Process a. Teachers must be made aware of observations as they are occurring and no mechanical or electronic recording devices shall be used for this purpose without the specific and clear consent of the teacher in advance of such use. Mechanical or electronic recording devices may only be used for teacher remedial purposes and with the full knowledge and consent of the teacher.
Procedures for the Evaluation Process. All tenured professors will be engaged in a 5-year evaluation process outlined in Article 5 of this contract. The procedure will include evaluation and observation tools developed by the college and approved by the federation. The process will take place between the tenured professor and their designated administrator. Each professor must complete a comprehensive self-evaluation every five years which includes:‌  Evaluation of three classes by students during the five-year cycle.‌  An observation conducted by every member of the tenured professor’s Teaching Excellence Community (TEC) within the five year cycle.‌  Data analysis and trends related to course and/or program student success outcomes over the five-year cycle.‌  Learning insights based upon learning goals and activities in which the faculty engaged over the five-year cycle.‌ The tenured professor will meet with their administrator and review the administrator’s evaluation which must include a minimum of one classroom‌ observation. The five year self-evaluation and administrator evaluation will be placed in the tenured professor’s personnel file at the conclusion of the five year cycle. Annual check-ins with the professor’s administrator is required to ensure that the professor is meeting professional development goals and receiving support from peers and college administration.‌

Related to Procedures for the Evaluation Process

  • Evaluation Procedures A. Teacher evaluation serves multiple purposes. This includes improving the overall quality of the teacher workforce by identifying and building on individual strengths, identifying quality instructional practices that improve student learning, providing support and feedback to teachers and ensuring valid employment decisions. Both principals and teachers have roles and responsibilities within the evaluation process.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • Procedures for LNP Request The Parties shall provide for the requesting of End Office LNP capability on a reciprocal basis through a written request. The Parties acknowledge that Verizon has deployed LNP throughout its network in compliance with FCC 96-286 and other applicable FCC Regulations.

  • Response to Evaluation The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher.

  • Verification Procedure (1) The signature file of each processed file is validated.

  • ESCALATION PROCEDURES 48.1 The Standard Practices outlines the escalation process which may be invoked at any point in the Service Ordering, Provisioning, and Maintenance processes to facilitate rapid and timely resolution of disputes.

  • NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES A. It is contemplated that matters included in this Agreement and other areas of common concern to the parties shall be subject to negotiation by mutual agreement between them from time to time during the period of this Agreement. The parties undertake to cooperate in arranging meetings, selecting representatives for such discussions, furnishing necessary information, and otherwise constructively considering the resolving of any such matters.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!