Administration Review Sample Clauses

Administration Review a. The appropriate Vice President, Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below, complete a formal evaluation, and confer with the tenured faculty member. i. The faculty member and Vice President, Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions commensurate with his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall be based upon at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. iii. Each evaluation may include information relevant to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including participation in curriculum development and review, and in development and assessment of student learning outcomes. Any information included in the faculty member’s evaluation regarding participation in curriculum or student learning outcome processes must be verified and documented. iv. A faculty member may also elect to have a second evaluation by a tenured faculty member of his/her choice. This second evaluation is intended for improvement of faculty members and it may become a part of the personnel file only at the request of the faculty member being evaluated. v. Faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. vi. Evaluations are to be based primarily on the observation described in subsection (ii) above. Hearsay statements, rumors or information from anonymous sources shall be excluded from written evaluations. The evaluator may include in the written evaluation information which has been documented through a completed investigation subsequent to a complaint, the findings of which investigation have been delivered to the faculty member under evaluation prior to the inclusion of this information in the evaluation report.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Administration Review a. The Vice President will: i. review recommendation(s), ii. forward recommendation(s), including his/her recommendations based upon his/her direct observation, to the President. b. The President will: i. review recommendation(s), ii. forward recommendation(s), including his/her recommendations based upon his/her direct observation, to the Chancellor. c. The Chancellor will: i. review recommendation(s), ii. forward recommendation(s), including his/her recommendations, to the Board of Trustees.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Administration Review a. The appropriate Vice President, Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below, complete a formal evaluation, and confer with the tenured faculty member. i. The faculty member and Vice President, Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions commensurate with his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall be based upon at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes.
Sample 1
Administration Review. The Vice President, Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below, complete a formal evaluation, and confer with the part-time faculty member. a. The part-time faculty member and Vice President, Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions commensurate with his/her teaching abilities. b. Each evaluation shall be based upon at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. c. Part-time faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. d. Evaluations are to be based predominantly on the observation described in subsection (b) above. Hearsay statements, rumors or information from anonymous sources shall be excluded from written evaluations. The evaluator may include in the written evaluation information which has been documented through a completed investigation subsequent to a complaint, the findings of which investigation have been delivered to the faculty member under evaluation prior to the inclusion of this information in the evaluation report.
Sample 1
Administration Review. The appropriate Vice President, Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below, complete a formal evaluation, and confer with the tenured faculty member.
Sample 1
Administration Review. The Vice President, Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below, complete a formal evaluation, and confer with the part-time faculty member. a. The part-time faculty member and Vice President, Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions commensurate with his/her teaching abilities. b. Each evaluation shall be based upon at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. c. Part-time faculty members shall not be held accountable for any aspect of the educational program over which they have no authority. d. The evaluator shall not base his/her evaluation of a faculty member on any information which was not collected through the evaluation procedures. Hearsay statements shall be excluded from written evaluations.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Administration Review

  • Program Administration An activity relating to the general management, oversight and coordination of community development programs. Costs directly related to carrying out eligible activities are not included.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Administration; Reports The Custodian shall, in general, attend to all non-discretionary details in connection with maintaining custody of the Receivable Files on behalf of the Trust Collateral Agent. In addition, the Custodian shall assist the Trust Collateral Agent generally in the preparation of any routine reports to Noteholders or to regulatory bodies, to the extent necessitated by the Custodian’s custody of the Receivable Files.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Grant Administration Grantee shall use the Grant funds only for the activities described in the approved Scope of Work. Grantee shall maintain financial records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all Grant funds in accordance with the terms set forth under this Agreement for a period of seven (7) years starting on the first day after final payment under the Agreement.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Claims Administration An employee will be required to comply with any and all rules and regulations and/or limitations established by the carrier or applicable third party administrator and contained in the policy, and employees and their dependents shall look solely to such carrier or third party administration for the adjudication of the payment of any and all benefits claims.

  • Administration Services When a medical prescription drug is administered by infusion, the administration of the prescription drug may be covered separately from the prescription drug. See Infusion Therapy - Administration Services in the Summary of Medical Benefits for benefit limits and the amount you pay. Prescription drugs that are self-administered are not covered as a medical benefit but may be covered as a pharmacy benefit. Please see Pharmacy Prescription Drugs and Diabetic Equipment or Supplies – Pharmacy Benefits section above for additional information. For some medical prescription drugs, after the first administration, coverage may be limited to certain locations (for example, a designated outpatient or ambulatory service facility, physician’s office, or your home), provided the location is appropriate based on your medical status. For a list of medical prescription drugs that are subject to this Site of Care Program, visit our website. Preauthorization may be required to determine medical necessity as well as appropriate site of care. If we deny your request for preauthorization, or you disagree with our determination for the appropriate site of care, you can submit a medical appeal. See Appeals in Section 5 for information on how to file a medical appeal.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!