The IGAD Peace Process Sample Clauses

The IGAD Peace Process. The failure of the Nigerian efforts at peace-making and the growing threat Sudan‟s war posed to regional security led the regional IGAD to assume a leading role in the peace process.97 This is a clear illustration of the systemic theory of war. The IGAD, a regional organization interested in the stability in the region, and concerned about the spread of political Islam and aiming at the unity of Sudan, began a process in 1994 between the SPLM/A-United and the GoS. The mediation by the countries of IGAD started in 1993 when the Sub-Committee on peace in the Sudan was constituted. The IGAD Sub-Committee was entrusted with the responsibility of bringing the Sudanese conflict to an end through a negotiated settlement. On February 1994, in Addis Ababa, the then President of Kenya, Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxx, was mandated to mediate as the chairman of the Sub-Committee for peace in Sudan. Thereafter, the session of the Standing Committee was convened in Nairobi on March 1994 to define the principles that constituted the framework for negotiation known as the Declaration of Principles.98 Nairobi then became the centre for negotiation process that culminated in the CPA on January 9, 2005.99 The DOP was supposed to constitute the basis for resolving the conflict in Sudan. It was considered a road map to peace. However, SPLM/A chairman Xxxx Xxxxxx insisted on what he called “Zero Interim Period,” meaning that he was more in favour of a split between the North and the South than unity.100 His insistence, however, did not bear fruits but all the same he signed the DOP. All the others agreed that what the DOP had come up with was a proper diagnosis of the conflict. President xx-Xxxxxx did not agree to sign the DOP as the document through which everything else could be negotiated.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The IGAD Peace Process

  • CENTRAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Boards Collective Bargaining Act central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply.

  • Grievance Process In the event of any dispute arising in connection with any part of this clause, such a dispute shall be processed in accordance with the dispute settling provisions of this Agreement.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Your Billing Rights: Keep This Document For Future Use This notice tells you about your rights and our responsibilities under the Fair Credit Billing Act.

  • Placement of EPP probes Probes for measuring EPP parameters shall be placed inside or close to Registrars points of access to the Internet across the different geographic regions; care shall be taken not to deploy probes behind high propagation-­‐delay links, such as satellite links.

  • CONTRACTOR STAFF WITHIN AUTHORIZED USER AGREEMENT The provisions of this section shall apply unless otherwise agreed in the Authorized User Agreement. All employees of the Contractor, or of its Subcontractors, who shall perform under an Authorized User Agreement, shall possess the necessary qualifications, training, licenses, and permits as may be required within the jurisdiction where the Services specified are to be provided or performed, and shall be legally entitled to work in such jurisdiction. All Business Entities that perform Services under the Contract on behalf of Contractor shall, in performing the Services, comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws concerning employment in the United States. Staffing Changes within Authorized User Agreement

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • GRIEVANCE PROCESS RIGHTS No grievant shall lose his/her right to process his/her grievance because of Management-imposed limitations in scheduling meetings.

  • Complaints Process The School shall establish and adhere to a process for resolving public complaints which shall include an opportunity for complainants to be heard. The final administrative appeal shall be heard by the School's Governing Board, except where the complaint pertains to a possible violation of any law or term under this Contract. The complaints process shall be readily accessible from the School’s website, as described in Section 11.4.1.

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.