The problems. What Are They and How Big Are They? There are four basic security problems faced by consumers, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), online retailers, security firms, and other stakeholders. Some of these 18 Xxxxx and Xxxxx (2009) argue that national cybersecurity is different in that it must try to prevent catastrophic harm, even when the probability of such harm is very small, and that the marginal thinking used in the economics of private information security is therefore not as relevant.
The problems. It is in this context that the problem of the 1972 refugees' land must be viewed. Following the tragedy in 1972, thousands of Burundians were compelled to leave their land and go into exile. Many of these properties have subsequently changed ownership. This redistribution of land was undertaken by the State out of concern for good utilization of a scarce resource. This was undertaken on the basis of laws that some have contested and qualified as unjust because they violate fundamental rights. The question thus arises of deciding between restoration of their property to returnees and protecting the rights acquired - subjectively often in good faith - by current owners. This will be one of the tasks of the Sub-Commission referred to in paragraph 1.4.3.3.(i) and (k). There is also the case of the Regional Development Corporation in Rumonge, which in the name of the State took the property of private citizens and developed it in order to plant a new variety of palm tree. In this operation, the Corporation redistributed properties, giving each recipient in some cases one hectare and in some other cases four hectares. Those who previously had a larger area saw this as an injustice. Some delegations assert that there are former landowners who have not been given land, whereas people who had no land have been given properties. Other delegations, on the other hand, believe that these are as yet unverified allegations. In addition, the fair and prior indemnification promised to all persons whose land was expropriated has allegedly not been paid. Thus the refugees did not take part in this redistribution because they were still in exile, but that does not deprive them of the right to claim their land or their compensation at a later stage. Lastly, and more recently, there is the problem of State-owned land, in relation to which irregularities and speculation have been observed. The allocation of State-owned land will henceforth have to take account of new needs relating to resettlement of sinistrés, to which priority must be assigned.
