Uzbekistan is prepared to cooperate fully and if necessary to take, within the framework of its trade policy and within the limits of its powers, measures to prevent the disruption of the trade for certain raw materials listed in Annex IV.
Uzbekistan. E 60 (Chardzhev —) Bukhara — Tashkent — Salar (— Chengeldy) E 696 Tashkent — Khavast — Andizhan (— Osh) E 695 Bukhara — Karshi — Termiz — Galaba (— Hairaton) E 597 (Beyneu —) Kungrad — Nukus — (Dashhowuz —) Urganch (— Chardzhev)
Uzbekistan. There are no country specific provisions.
Uzbekistan. Title: Erasmus Programme Higher Education between the Universitat de Lleida and the Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engeneers
Uzbekistan. The following shall apply to all Grantees living in Uzbekistan on the Exercise Date of any Option granted under paragraph A. of the Agreement: In lieu of paragraph A.2.(c) of the Agreement, the following shall apply:
Uzbekistan. In this case, very large sums of money had been paid to consultants who were people with very close ties to the government and the question was whether these sums of money had been paid as a bribe or had been paid for lawful services.119 Facts relating to these payments had been the subject of several procedural orders and the tribunal had put claimant “on notice” that, inter alia, “contemporaneous documents supporting the facts [relating to the services allegedly 117 See eg Article 61(2) of the ICSID Convention: “In the case of arbitration proceedings the Tribunal shall, except as the parties otherwise agree, assess the expenses incurred by the parties in connection with the proceedings, and shall decide how and by whom those expenses, the fees and expenses of the members of the Tribunal and the charges for the use of the facilities of the Centre shall be paid. Such decision shall form part of the award.” See also Article 42 of the 2013 UNCITRAL Rules: “The costs of the arbitration shall in principle be borne by the unsuccessful party or parties. However, the arbitral tribunal may apportion each of such costs between the parties if it determines that apportionment is reasonable, taking into account the circumstances of the case.” 118 See Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, ‘In an innovative award, arbitrators pressure Uzbekistan – under threat of adverse cost order – to donate to UN anticorruption initiative; also propose future treaty drafting changes that would penalize states for corruption’ IA Reporter (22 June 2017). The article further noted that: ‘the tribunal warned that Uzbekistan’s failure to make such a payment would lead to an adverse cost order in the case, with the government held liable for the costs of the proceedings, as well as reimbursing the claimant for 75% of more than $17 million in legal fees and expenses. (Conversely, if Uzbekistan made the contribution, it would bear only its own legal costs, and half the cost of the proceedings.).’ Arbitrator Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx is reported to have dissented on this point: ‘According to Xx. Xxxxx, the equal role of the two parties in the corruption should be reflected in both of them equally bearing the consequences. She was of the opinion that this was achieved by both parties losing their claims before the tribunal and that there was therefore no basis for differentiating between them in relation to costs.’ 119 Metal-Tech (n 102) [244-266]. performed for the payments] would assist the Tribunal...
Uzbekistan. “In accordance with section 4 of article 13 of the Agreement, the Republic of Uzbekistan declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of section 2 of article 11 of the Agreement.” Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Since the procedure established for the settlement of disputes arising in connexion with the application or interpretation of this Agreement is incompatible with Venezulean legislation, Venezuela expresses a specific reservation concerning article 11, section 2.
Uzbekistan. < Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed December 16, 1994; pending exchange of instruments)
Uzbekistan. 25. Mr. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Chief Specialist, Main Department of Foreign Trade Customs-Tariff Regulation Improvement and Optimizing Imports, Ministry for Foreign Trade
