Washington Federation of State Employees Sample Clauses

Washington Federation of State Employees. The parties agree that once there is a final decision on the Public Employment Relations Commission question concerning representation of the language access provider bargaining unit (all appeals are exhausted), if court interpreting for the Department of Social and Health Services or Medicaid Administrative Match program interpreting are included in the bargaining unit, the parties agree to reopen the agreement solely to address issues specifically related to these groups. Any agreement reached will be applied prospectively. For the State For the Union /s/ 7/12/12 /s/ 7/12/12 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Date Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Date MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN STATE OF WASHINGTON AND WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES The parties recognize that the 2013-2015 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the State and the Washington Federation of State Employees- Language Access Providers does not specify an overpayment recovery process. In light of recent instances of overpayments, the parties agree to the following process when collecting overpayments:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Washington Federation of State Employees. The parties agree that once there is a final decision on the Public Employment Relations Commission question concerning representation of the language access provider bargaining unit (all appeals are exhausted), if court interpreting for the Department of Social and Health Services or Medicaid Administrative Match program interpreting are included in the bargaining unit, the parties agree to reopen the agreement solely to address issues specifically related to these groups. Any agreement reached will be applied prospectively. /s/ /s/ For the State Date For the Union Date MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES, AFSCME COUNCIL 28 The parties recognize that 2ESHB 1087 requires the Health Care Authority to develop and implement a new model for delivery of spoken-language interpreter services no later than January 1, 2012. The parties further recognize that implementation of this new model will likely impact certain aspects of the parties’ 2011-2013 collective bargaining agreement. Therefore, the parties agree that once the new model is developed, (procurement is complete and contract is awarded) Article 6 of the collective bargaining agreement will be reopened for the purpose of negotiating the impacts of the new model for delivery of spoken-language interpreter services. The parties recognize that the legislature reduced the maintenance level funding for the medical interpreter program in fiscal year 2012 and even further in fiscal year 2013. The legislature assumed that efficiencies would be achieved through reductions in administrative costs and utilization of technology. The rate of pay for interpreters in Article 6 of the parties’ 2011-2013 collective bargaining agreement was based on maintaining the current brokerage system until HCA implements the new model for spoken language interpreter services and using fiscal year 2012 appropriations. If the State does not realize savings to account for the total reduction between fiscal year 2012 and 2013 appropriations, then the rate of pay may be negatively impacted when the parties re-negotiate Article 6 pursuant to this memorandum of understanding. If the State does realize savings to account for the total reduction between fiscal year 2012 and 2013 appropriations, then the hourly rate may be positively impacted when the parties re- negotiate Article 6 pursuant to this memorandum of understanding. Dated June 10, 2011 /s/ /s/ For the State For th...
Sample 1
Washington Federation of State Employees. The parties agree that once there is a final decision on the Public Employment Relations Commission question concerning representation of the language access provider bargaining unit (all appeals are exhausted), if court interpreting for the Department of Social and Health Services or Medicaid Administrative Match program interpreting are included in the bargaining unit, the parties agree to reopen the agreement solely to address issues specifically related to these groups. Any agreement reached will be applied prospectively.
Sample 1
Washington Federation of State Employees. Agenda Item for Interpreter Advisory Group The parties agree the Interpreter Advisory Group will discuss creating endorsements for DSHS certifications and authorizations based on an interpreter achieving significant additional training in a given field. Fields of expertise considered for individual endorsements could include, but not be limited to, services requested by oncologists, cardiologists, mental health providers, family counseling meetings, drug and alcohol rehabilitation meetings, and domestic violence related meetings. Dated July 30, 2016 For the State: For the Union: /s/ /s/ Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN State of Washington AND
Sample 1
Washington Federation of State Employees. The State will provide monthly reports delineating the number of encounters covered by this Agreement from the previous month and the total 2011-2013 biennium dollars paid in the previous month through the HCA Interpreter Services program. The State will provide bi-monthly reports delineating the number of encounters covered by this Agreement in the previous two months and the total number of 2011-2013 biennium dollars paid outside of the HCA Interpreter Services program. The parties can mutually agree to adjust these reports on an as needed basis. Dated June 10, 2011 For the State For the Union Memorandum of Understanding BETWEEN State of Washington AND
Sample 1
Washington Federation of State Employees. The State of Washington and the Washington Federation of State Employees agree to modify the terms and conditions of the 2013-2015 Collective Bargaining Agreement. Specifically, from the effective date of this Memorandum of Understanding through June 30, 2015, the parties agree to replace Article 11 of the 2013-2015 Collective Bargaining Agreement with the following provisions:
Sample 1
Washington Federation of State Employees. The parties agree that once there is a final decision on the Public Employment Relations Commission question concerning representation of the language access provider bargaining unit (all appeals are exhausted), if Medicaid Administrative Match program interpreting is included in the bargaining unit, the parties agree to reopen the agreement solely to address issues specifically related to these groups. Any agreement reached will be applied prospectively. For the State For the Union /s/ 7/9/14 /s/ 7/9/14 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Date Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Date MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES AND
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Washington Federation of State Employees

  • Summary of State Ethics Laws Pursuant to the requirements of section 1-101qq of the Connecticut General Statutes, the summary of State ethics laws developed by the State Ethics Commission pursuant to section 1-81b of the Connecticut General Statutes is incorporated by reference into and made a part of the Contract as if the summary had been fully set forth in the Contract.

  • Secretary of State The Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

  • WASHINGTON’S STATEWIDE PAYEE DESK Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor is registered with Washington’s Statewide Payee Desk, which registration is a condition to payment.

  • Disclosure of Prior State Employment If this Contract is for consulting services under Chapter 2254 of the Texas Government Code, in accordance with Section 2254.033 of the Texas Government Code, Contractor certifies that it does not employ an individual who was employed by System Agency or another agency at any time during the two years preceding the submission of any related Solicitation Response related to this Contract or, in the alternative, Contractor has disclosed in any related Solicitation Response the following:

  • Requirements of the State of Kansas 1. The contractor shall observe the provisions of the Kansas Act against Discrimination (Kansas Statutes Annotated 44-1001, et seq.) and shall not discriminate against any person in the performance of work under the present contract because of race, religion, color, sex, disability, and age except where age is a bona fide occupational qualification, national origin or ancestry;

  • CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment - Continued If you answered "No, Vendor does not certify - Lobbying to Report" to the above attribute question, you must download, read, execute, and upload the attachment entitled "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL", as instructed, to report the lobbying activities you performed or paid others to perform. 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Federal Rule Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (Contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000) Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members requires the proposer certify that in performance of the contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $250,000, the vendor will be in compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). Does vendor certify compliance? Yes 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Procurement of Recovered Materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include: (1) procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; (2) procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. Does vendor certify that it is in compliance with these provisions? Yes 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Rights to Inventions If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR §401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. Pursuant to the above, when the foregoing applies to ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that during the term of an award resulting from this procurement process, Vendor agrees to comply with all applicable requirements as referenced in the Federal rule above. Does vendor certify? Yes

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!