Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law, Oxford (2015), p. 7; X. X. XXXXXX; XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; X.
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X Xxxxxx (Feb 12, 2020)
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Consultant to Centre WISP Venture Company, LLC (000) 000-0000 Attachments: Centre WISP d/b/a/ Black Bear Fiber Voice Service Agreement Sample Webpage Advertising Voice and Broadband Service on Black Bear Fiber Website Black Bear Fiber Lifeline Marketing cc: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx The terms and conditions of this Service Agreement (“Terms” or “Agreement”) constitute the agreement (“Agreement”) between Centre WISP Fiber Venture Company, LLC d/b/a Black Bear Fiber (“Black Bear Fiber”, “Company”, “We”, “Us”) and the User (“you”, “User” or “Customer”) of the Company’s residential and business voice communications Services (“Phone Service”), and any related products or services (individually and collectively, “Service”). This Agreement governs both the Service and any connected Device (“Device” or “Equipment”), used in conjunction with the Service. Additional Terms and Conditions located on the Black Bear Fiber website at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx may also apply. By using the Service, you represent that you are of legal age to enter into this agreement and that you have read and understand fully the terms and conditions of this agreement. PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BECAUSE IT INCLUDES MANY IMPORTANT TERMS, INCLUDING: WARNINGS THAT YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO USE THE VOIP SERVICE FOR 911 OR OTHER EMERGENCY CALLS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, AND LIMITS AND DISCLAIMERS ON COMPANY’S LIABILITY. Black Bear Fiber Phone Service is delivered using Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology. The monthly charges for Phone Service shall be the then-current monthly charge, as posted on our website at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. Residential VoIP Phone services include the following features: • Unlimited Local & Long Distance Calling in the contiguous lower 48 U.S. States • Per-minute rates for International Calling • Caller ID (with Name if available) • Call Waiting • 3-way Calling • Call Forwarding • Voicemail (with text and/or e-mail notification option) If you make calls to international locations, then International rates will apply. Please contact our office at 000-000-0000 for the current International rates. You must supply certain equipment and facilities, such as a phone handset or equivalent, installed phone or network cabling and termination outlets, and a powered electrical outlet. You are responsible for supplying and ensuring that the equipment you supply is compatible with the Service and meets feder...
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. So thanks for the question. So there's multiple areas of fit here, and let me go back to what we -- the assessment process that we made. Our main goal in identifying where to expand our portfolio was driven by broadening our offering into the markets that we already serve in Engineered Materials, for example. So the fact that the PMMA resin business offers compounded solutions to those same customer end uses, for example, in automotive, building and construction, consumer electronics and medical, is one of the biggest parts of the fit. The other thing, as you pointed out, there's a very similar application know-how to tailor-make the solution and formulate PMMA compounds as there is with our current Engineered Materials portfolio. And that's -- and frankly, that skill is a great differentiator within the Arkema business. And let me also build on this by referencing the slide 12 in our presentation deck, because I think that will give you a flavor for how differentiated this business is and what kind of skills they have in addressing our customer solutions. And I would point to the number of customers that are served by the resin business, which is really mostly compounds, that there's 663 SKUs at customized product solutions that go to almost 484 ship-to locations around the world. And that's 78% of the business' EBITDA contribution. So it's a great fit, great know-how with customer applications and very similar to what we do in Engineered Materials.
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. By: Xxxxx X Xxxxxx (Mar 30, 2021 06:25 EDT) Date: 03/30/2021 Title/Position: School Business Administrator By: Date: 3/28/2021 _ Printed Name: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Version 1.0
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx #18858
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Purchase Order and Sales Contact Email 2 Purchase Order and Sales Contact Phone 2 3 Company Website 4 Entity D/B/A's and Assumed Names 5 Primary Address 2 Primary Address City 7 Primary Address State 2 8 Primary Address Zip 9 Search Words Identifying Vendor
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law, passim, esp. 16-31. 80 See X. XXXXXX; X. XXXXXX (eds.): Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives, Springer, Vienna (2009). 81 Judgement of the Court of Justice, 13 July 2006, C-295/04 to C-298/04, Xxxxxxxx, xxxxx. 92-93. 82 Green Paper - Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (COM/2005/0672 final), p. 7. On the compensatory principle informing the Damages Directive, see X. XXXXXXXX: Causation in Competition Law Damages Actions, pp. 13-16. 83 European Parliament Resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (2006/2207(INI)), para. 17. 84 Article 3.3. 85 Green Paper, pp. 7-8. Although in favor of that the ability of the victim to mitigate the damage and losses may be taken into account, the Parliament noted that the possibility of defendants arguing that all or part of the gains they made as a result of the infringement have been transferred to third parties (the passing-on defense) would be detrimental to establishing the extent of the damage and the causal link. However, the Commission subsequently accepted it in the White Paper, not on the grounds of the principle of effectiveness, but on the grounds of the doctrine against unjust enrichment as well as on the basis of an (alleged) common compensatory principle of European tort law.86 Despite this, the compensatory principle also underlies most national tort systems,87 without the admissibility of the passing-on defence necessarily being recognised as such in these systems before the entry into force of the Directive.88 In fact, it is also not recognised afterwards outside the scope harmonised by it. Generally, on the contrary, the deduction of the benefits obtained from the amount of compensatable damages is accepted, where appropriate, through the doctrines of mitigatio or compensation lucri cum damno, whose admissibility (not only in the area of contract law, but also in tort law) and the conditions for their application vary from one Member State’s legal system to another. Indeed, the very harmonization of this part of the legal system was justified, inter alia, by the divergence between national rules on those doctrines, which affected the defendant’s possibilities of avoiding compensation See European Parliament Resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (2006/2207(INI)), paras. 17, 19. 86 More spec...
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Signature Line
