Proposed Structure definition

Proposed Structure means the structure set out in paragraphs 10, 11 and 12 of the Announcement.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Proposed Structure. The debenture will be convertible at the lesser of, a share price using shares valued at a private company valuation of $6,000,000 (pre-investment), or a 40% discount from the previous 5 day, from the date of conversion, average closing bid price of the common stock.

Proposed Structure has the meaning given to it in Recital B;

Examples of Proposed Structure in a sentence

• Should AB InBev elect to implement the Transaction by way of a UK Offer or make any other changes to the Proposed Structure in accordance with Clause 6.9, the terms of the Transaction shall be set out in the UK Offer Document and such other additional or amended public documents as are required in relation to the amended Transaction structure.

• Site # Stream or Feature / Crossing Roadway Existing Proposed Structure Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (lf) 1 UT to Perry Creek / I-540 72” RCP Retain existing 0.1 70 2 UT to Perry Creek / I-540 2 @ 8’ x 6’ RCBC Retain existing and add 72” supp.

• Our PRC legal counsel, King &Wood Mallesons and the Joint Sponsors’ PRC legal counsel, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & Gongcheng, Attorneys At Law, have advised that the establishment of the ABC QDII Fund by the QDII Manager on behalf of the independent cornerstone investor (as permitted by PRC statutory procedures) and the Proposed Structure (in so far as it concerns PRC laws and regulations as currently in force) comply with PRC laws, regulations and regulatory documents.

• In the event that the actual structure of the RESI purchase financing or the takeout financing (the "Closing Structure") involves materially less equity that the amount in the Proposed Structure and/or Blackstone is not the lead investor in such financings, then the USWA shall be given the right to approve the Closing Structure, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.

• Each organization will likely establish its own policy within the requirements of employment law and regulations Proposed Structure Replacement ▇▇▇▇▇▇ River RTT Bridge (Q0-013) Rails to Trails, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ River, Queens County, PE Project No. 121621161 September 24, 2020 Prepared for: PEI Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

• Blackstone agrees that prior to the commencement of the RESI acquisition it will provide the USWA with a description of the intended RESI purchase financing and takeout financing (the "Proposed Structure") and afford the USWA the right to approve such Proposed Structure, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.

• The following traffic control measures will be implemented: Other Description: Description: (provide name of waterway or facility structure crosses) Existing Proposed Structure Type: Weight Restrictions: tonne (ton) tonne (ton) Height Restrictions: m (ft) m (ft) Curb to Curb Width: mm (ft) mm (ft) Shoulder Width: mm (ft) mm (ft) Total Bridge Width*: m (ft) m (ft) *Total Bridge Width is measured from outside of barrier to outside of barrier, which should include sidewalks, when present.

• Each organization will likely establish its own policy within the requirements of employment law and regulations Geotechnical Study Proposed Structure Replacement St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (K3-065), Route 22 St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Kings County, PE Project No. 121621178 October 29, 2020 Prepared for: PEI Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy PO Box 2000 Charlottetown PE C1A 7N8 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

• Proposed Structure ■ West Parking and East Parking Lots: Removal and replacement of the existing asphalt pavement with concrete pavement sections ■ The Southwest Parking and Overflow Parking Lots: Milling and overlaying new asphalt pavement sections.

• The Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to assist Parent in the implementation of any Proposed Structure Modifications and the Plan of Arrangement shall be amended accordingly, in each case, to the extent the same (A) does not reduce the amounts of cash payable to the holders of Shares, Company Options and Company RSUs pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement and (B) are to be completed immediately prior to, contemporaneously with, or subject to, or after, the Effective Time.

More Definitions of Proposed Structure

Proposed Structure. A Central Facility Supporting Localized Nodes 13 Fiscal Sponsorship with the International Land and Forest Tenure Facility 14 Governance 15 Human Resources 16 Budget 16 Direct Grants 17 Service Provision 18 Operating Costs 18 Milestones to 2030 18 DocuSign Envelope ID: 38ED7807-5241-4B41-9609-69393C14A7CE Coastal and shoreline communities are at the front line of ocean and coastal change; small-scale fishers represent the largest group of ocean users, and Indigenous Peoples have long histories of custodianship of ocean, lakes, rivers, coasts and shorelines. In many contexts, local communities, small-scale fishers and Indigenous Peoples hold communal rights to access, use, manage and govern these spaces. These rights are recognized as being integral to broader human rights. They are legally recognised, at least on paper, in international instruments and in constitutions and other laws of many nations. Yet, their diversity, informality and communal nature means these tenure systems and rights are frequently overlooked, undermined, and even abused in practice. Strengthening or building the conditions that ensure rights recognition and enable tenure security offer critical avenues - not only for human rights - but toward improved environmental stewardship, food and livelihood security, poverty reduction, and greater social and gender equity. At the same time, there is a striking lack of direct funding to locally-led efforts and even less flowing directly to local groups. What’s more, the funding that does make it to frontline communities is almost always laced with power imbalances, with most of the philanthropic and aid funding flowing through international non-governmental organizations or other institutions controlled from the Global North. Currently, >99% of philanthropic funding for coastal communities and small-scale fisheries is granted to large international NGOs in the global North - the same trends are reflected in aid and climate funding). This financial landscape has sustained and exacerbated the marginalization and disenfranchisement of local communities, small-scale fishers and Indigenous Peoples. At its most benign, the funding model most prevalent in the philanthropic space, including in coastal and marine philanthropy, undermines local initiatives, hinders long term systemic change and reinforces systemic inequities. At its worst, it violates sovereignty and rights, and is in direct violation of myriad global conventions and treaties. There is...