Scenario 3. Cases where a Participating Institution needs to change the Reviewing IRB (either if they have ceded or are serving as that IRB) for specific Research currently under the SMART IRB Agreement, but does not want to terminate the SMART IRB Agreement (e.g., the Participating Institution wants to take back review of the Research or the Reviewing IRB must give up review).
Scenario 3. If the Final Price is greater than the Floor Price and less than the Cap Price, then: Floor Price / Final Price
Scenario 3. A student initially applies through one Representative, and later, a second or subsequent Representative applies on behalf of the same student.
Examples of Scenario 3 in a sentence
Scenario 1 – Upward Trend Scenario 2 – Downward Trend Scenario 3 – Volatile Market Description of Air Bag MechanismThe Certificates integrate an “Air Bag Mechanism” which is designed to reduce exposure to theUnderlying Stock during extreme market conditions.When the Air Bag triggers, a 30-minute period starts.
Scenario 1 – Upward Trend Scenario 2 – Downward Trend Scenario 3 – Volatile Market Description of Air Bag MechanismThe Certificates integrate an “Air Bag Mechanism” which is designed to reduce exposure to the Underlying Stock during extreme market conditions.When the Air Bag triggers, a 30-minute period starts.
This CARC/RARC combination is compliant with CAQH CORE Business Scenario 3.
Business Scenario 3: Jasmine Connors is the patient and the subscriber and went to Dr. Martin Stevenson, who prescribed Jasmine Connors with a commode chair from the Loucks Family Medical Supply due to a broken back.
Table 5 below provides projected supplies and demands under Scenario 3.
More Definitions of Scenario 3
Scenario 3. Option:- Exclusivity Coverage of MTR stations -Commercial Terms
Scenario 3. If Developer has not commenced construction of the Lift Station Upgrade when a Future Development is issued a building permit, the City will determine whether the Future Development’s anticipated discharge will exceed the then- existing capacity of the Sierra Point Lift Station.
Scenario 3. If the Company sells less than the Target Amount of Series B Preferred Stock to an Outside Investor in the Second Closing, then Amazxx.xxx xxx, in its sole discretion, elect to purchase additional shares of Series B and/or Series B-1 Preferred Stock in the Second Closing, but only to the extent that following such additional purchase its percentage ownership of the capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis (assuming full conversion and exercise of all convertible or exercisable securities of the Company, including securities reserved for issuance and not granted under the Company's stock and option plans) will not exceed the Ownership Threshold. If Amazxx.xxx xxxcts to purchase fewer shares of Stock than the maximum number to which it would otherwise be entitled to maintain its ownership at 46% on a fully diluted basis at the time of the Second Closing, then the Company may in its sole discretion elect to convert in whole or in part the Notes issued to the other Purchasers in the Initial Closing on a pro rata basis based on the respective principal amounts of such Notes and/or to sell additional shares of Stock to any Purchaser, provided that the total number of shares of Series B and/or Series B-1 Preferred Stock issued hereunder (including upon conversion of the Notes) does not exceed 5,886,149 shares total for all closings (plus, as may be applicable, the Amazon True-Up Shares). Any unconverted principal under the Notes issued to each of the other Purchasers, and accrued interest on the foregoing Notes shall be payable in full in cash by the Company to each Purchaser as applicable at the Second Closing.
Scenario 3 means the Phase 3 Success Criteria is not achieved on or prior to June 30, 2028.
Scenario 3. Users who do not have an existing EIDM ID
Scenario 3. Xxxxx Xxxxxx was a retirement system covered employee of a State Institution of Higher Learning (State University) who voted for Medicare coverage in the referendum. The State University was covered for Medicare as a “deemed retirement system group” separate from the rest of the State government positions. Subsequently, Xx. Xxxxxx moved to a If the transfer did terminate the overall employment relationship, then the continuing employment relationship exemption would not apply, and Xx. Xxxxxx would be considered a “new hire” as far as the current State employer is concerned and would fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the transfer did not terminate the overall employment relationship with the State, then (b) would be fulfilled and the continuation of employment exception to mandatory Medicare would apply. In other words, Xx. Xxxxxx would not fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the employee has fulfilled the requirements for the continuing employment exception, then we look at the continuation of coverage aspects. Scenario 4: Same as Scenario 3, both current and former employers are entities within the same State government, except each entity is covered by a different retirement system. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was a retirement system covered employee of a State Institution of Higher Learning (State University) who voted for Medicare coverage in the referendum. The State University was covered for Medicare as a “deemed retirement system group” separate from the rest of the State government positions. Subsequently, Xx. Xxxxxxx moved to a non-State University position with a State Agency that was covered by a different retirement system. Employees in both positions are State employees. Does the Xx. Xxxxxxx carry his vote? If the transfer did terminate the overall employment relationship, then the continuing employment relationship exemption would not apply, and Xx. Xxxxxxx would be considered a “new hire” as far as the current State employer is concerned and would fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the transfer did not terminate the overall employment relationship with the State, then (b) would be fulfilled and the continuation of employment exception to mandatory Medicare would apply. In other words, Xx. Xxxxxxx would not fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the employee has fulfilled the requirements for the continuing employment exception, then we look at the continuation of coverage aspects.
Scenario 3. The Blocking of Camera(s)