Scenario 3 definition
Scenario 3. Cases where a Participating Institution needs to change the Reviewing IRB (either if they have ceded or are serving as that IRB) for specific Research currently under the SMART IRB Agreement, but does not want to terminate the SMART IRB Agreement (e.g., the Participating Institution wants to take back review of the Research or the Reviewing IRB must give up review).
Scenario 3. If the Final Price is greater than the Floor Price and less than the Cap Price, then: Floor Price / Final Price
Scenario 3. The Blocking of Camera(s)
Examples of Scenario 3 in a sentence
Hours of operation under Scenario 3 (By-Pass Biogas) shall not exceed 240 hours per consecutive 12-month rolling period.
Scenario 3 A health trust is looking to extend their existing rostering software maintenance arrangements for the next 3 years.
More Definitions of Scenario 3
Scenario 3. A student initially applies through one Representative, and later, a second or subsequent Representative applies on behalf of the same student.
Scenario 3. Option:- Exclusivity Coverage of MTR stations -Commercial Terms
Scenario 3. Xxxxx Xxxxxx was a retirement system covered employee of a State Institution of Higher Learning (State University) who voted for Medicare coverage in the referendum. The State University was covered for Medicare as a “deemed retirement system group” separate from the rest of the State government positions. Subsequently, Xx. Xxxxxx moved to a If the transfer did terminate the overall employment relationship, then the continuing employment relationship exemption would not apply, and Xx. Xxxxxx would be considered a “new hire” as far as the current State employer is concerned and would fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the transfer did not terminate the overall employment relationship with the State, then (b) would be fulfilled and the continuation of employment exception to mandatory Medicare would apply. In other words, Xx. Xxxxxx would not fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the employee has fulfilled the requirements for the continuing employment exception, then we look at the continuation of coverage aspects. Scenario 4: Same as Scenario 3, both current and former employers are entities within the same State government, except each entity is covered by a different retirement system. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was a retirement system covered employee of a State Institution of Higher Learning (State University) who voted for Medicare coverage in the referendum. The State University was covered for Medicare as a “deemed retirement system group” separate from the rest of the State government positions. Subsequently, Xx. Xxxxxxx moved to a non-State University position with a State Agency that was covered by a different retirement system. Employees in both positions are State employees. Does the Xx. Xxxxxxx carry his vote? If the transfer did terminate the overall employment relationship, then the continuing employment relationship exemption would not apply, and Xx. Xxxxxxx would be considered a “new hire” as far as the current State employer is concerned and would fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the transfer did not terminate the overall employment relationship with the State, then (b) would be fulfilled and the continuation of employment exception to mandatory Medicare would apply. In other words, Xx. Xxxxxxx would not fall under the mandatory Medicare provisions. If the employee has fulfilled the requirements for the continuing employment exception, then we look at the continuation of coverage aspects.
Scenario 3. If Developer has not commenced construction of the Lift Station Upgrade when a Future Development is issued a building permit, the City will determine whether the Future Development’s anticipated discharge will exceed the then- existing capacity of the Sierra Point Lift Station.
Scenario 3. The contractor maintains the PSA, does not relinquish and is not terminated – sleeping license:
Scenario 3. 60 Year Old Single Covered Person 10YR = 3.7% Benefit Base = $80,000 10 YR (3.7%) x Age Adjustment [(.70)] = 2.59%* XXX = $2400 ($80,000 x 3.0%) * Since 2.59% is less than the minimum XXX% for a 60 year old (3.0%), the GLWB Elector would receive the minimum XXX% of 3.0%.
Scenario 3 means the Phase 3 Success Criteria is not achieved on or prior to June 30, 2028.