Table I. Targeted schedule and timeline for Phase I * - indicates steps that can be performed in parallel Step Estimated Duration, cost From start of phase Milestones [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] The proposed Phase II timeline encompasses use of the [***].
Table I. Means and Standard Deviations of the MSL for the Three Configurations Closest to the MSL and FWHM Thresholds CROSSING OVER THE THREE FREQUENCY BANDS, AS [180 Hz, 600 Hz] (LOW), [600 Hz, 1250 Hz] (MEDIUM), AND [1250 Hz, 2 kHz] (HIGH) −− Fig. 3. Array configurations for different geometries within the mean MSL/mean FWHM space. Each marker represents an array shape: conical tip up (CU), conical tip down (CD), cylindrical four circles (C4), spherical (Sp), and cylindrical two circles (C2). The frequency bands used for averaging are [160 Hz, 2 kHz] for the MSL and [180 Hz, 2 kHz] for the FWHM. represents both the MSL and FWHM thresholds given in Section II-A. frequency band for all of the tested cases, to yield the solution that has the most uniform performance. This is a requirement for the array, as wideband signal recordings are expected as input. This method allows visual and synthetic representation of the performance of various array configurations, by plotting each one in the mean MSL/mean FWHM space, as seen in the array conception in Section IV. Consequently, the array that approaches the nearest to the thresholds defined in Section II can be easily selected from this synthesized view of the array performances.
Table I and “Table II” means the correspondingly numbered lists of substances annexed to this Convention, as amended from time to time in accordance with article 12;
Examples of Table I in a sentence
Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check Applicable Line)X Form filed by One Reporting PersonForm filed by More than One Reporting Person Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1.
Individual or Joint/Group Filing(Check Applicable Line)_ X _ Form filed by One Reporting PersonForm filed by More than One Reporting Person Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned1.Title of Security2.
Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1.
Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer(Check all applicable)Director 10% Owner (Last) (First) Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1.Title of Security (Instr.
Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1.Title of Security (Instr.
More Definitions of Table I
Table I. Means (standard deviations) of selected variables IJM 25,3/4
Table I. PARTY A THRESHOLDS
Table I. I: Projected Impact of HHK subsidies on the LPG subsector and the economy Year (A) HHK 10% of Actual Additional Total (F) % Increase Subsidy in HHK 12.5kg 12.5kg to be =D+E (G) Billion Naira (B) Subsidy to be Used (C) Figures (D) Generated by Subsidy (E) 2006 88.456 8.8456 4,640,000 5,897,066 10.537,066 127.0 2007 90.814 9.0814 4,800,000 5,342,000 10,142,000 111.0 2008 188.554 18.8554 8,000,000 9,427,700 17,427,700 118.0
Table I. Means, standard deviations, and correlations: study 1 On passion and heavy work investment
Table I. School Funding System Weights Weighted Group Description of the Weighted Group Weight English Learners PRDE identifies Spanish as the main language instructed, therefore, the correct description to this weighted group would be Spanish Learners (SL)* 1.94 Low-Income Students Students economically disadvantaged are defined as those whose family nucleus receive less 1.53 * The language of instruction in PRDE is Spanish. Therefore, instead of English Language Proficiency (ELP), students are identified as Spanish Learners (SL). SL are students who are unable to communicate fluently or learn effectively in Spanish, who often come from non-Spanish-speaking homes and backgrounds, and who typically require specialized or modified instruction in both the Spanish language and in their academic courses. Other Educationally Disadvantaged Students:1 Weighted Group Description of the Weighted Group Weight PRDE will not include Other Educationally Disadvantaged Students for purposes of the WSF. N/A N/A 1 “Other Educationally Disadvantaged Students” are students with any other characteristics associated with educational disadvantage chosen by the LEA pursuant to ESEA section 1501(d)(2)(A)(ii), which may include students with disabilities. If your student-centered funding system includes more than two groups of educationally disadvantaged students, please add additional rows to the table. If fewer than two, please leave row(s) blank. Other Weighted Student Groups:2 Weighted Group Description of the Weighted Group Weight Grade Span – Primary Students attending school level from K to 8th grade 1.31
Table I. Means, standard deviations, Cronbachalphas, and correlations among variablesstudied a(N varies from 251 to 281) M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91. LMX 3.79 0.59 (0.77)2. Transformational leadership 3.49 0.72 ****0.62 (0.88)3. Value system congruence 0.70 0.20 **0.14 ****0.294. Assertiveness 2.30 0.68 0.08 0.07 0.01 (0.65)5. Bargaining 2.42 0.88 0.01 0.05 0.10 ****0.46 (0.72)6. Coalition 2.98 1.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 ****0.35 ****0.35 (0.59)7. Friendliness 3.26 0.64 ***0.16 ***0.19 0.01 **0.12 ****0.30 ****0.22 (0.53)8. Higher authority 2.01 0.67 ** 0.15 ** 0.12 0.04 ****0.51 ****0.41 ****0.30 ***0.19 (0.56)9. Reasoning 3.99 0.67 ****0.31 ****0.21 0.01 ****0.28 *0.11 ***0.19 ****0.24 0.06 (0.59)Notes : a Cronbach alpha is in parentheses along diagonal.*= p 0.10. **= p 0.05. ***= p 0.01. ****= p 0.001related to perceived value system congruence. I followed the procedure suggested by Baron and Kenny (1986) to test my Hypothesis 1 that transformational leadership would mediate the relationship between LMX and leader-follower value system congruence. Transformational leadership was first regressed on LMX; the model was significant at 0.001 level (R-Square 0.38) and the parameter estimate of LMX was 0.75 (t 13.13,Impact of transformationalleadership
Table I. Core OTI Patent--Method for the Non-Contact Transmission of Data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Filed Patent Country Number Date Number Date Status ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X.X. 000000 0/0/00 0000000 00/0/00 Xxxxted Israel 100451 20/12/91 100451 10/10/96 Granted Canada 2053830 23/12/91 2058330 8/1/99 Allowance Singapore 9607564/3 23/00/00 0000000/0 00/0/00 Xxxxxed Australia 90011/91 24/12/91 640843 8/1/94 Granted South Africa 91/10164 27/00/00 00/00000 30/9/92 Granted Hong Kong 97101652.1 12/8/97 Pending EUROPE 91122099.4 23/12/91 0 492 569 4/11/98 Granted Germany Europe 691-30-447-05-08 04/11/98 Granted Italy Europe 192090E/99 13/1/99 Granted Austria Europe 0 492 569 2/2/99 Granted Denmark Europe P199801745 21/1/99 Granted Sweden Europe 0 492 569 26/1/99 Granted Netherlands Xxxxxx 0 000 000 4/11/98 Granted Greece Europe 990400178 18/1/99 Granted Switzerland Europe 0 492 569 4/11/98 Granted Belgium Europe 0 492 569 4/11/98 Granted Spain Europe ES 2125860 T3 4/11/98 Granted France Europe 0 492 569 4/11/98 Granted UK Europe Luxembourg Europe ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------