ACP. EU cooperation shall provide effective assistance to achieve the objectives and priorities which the ACP States have set themselves in the context of regional cooperation and integration.
ACP. The ACP test in Section 4.10(C).
ACP. The Applicable Contribution Rate of an ACP Participant who is an NHCE for the ACP test is the sum of the NHCE's Matching Contributions and QNECs used in the ACP test, divided by the NHCE's Compensation.
ACP. The Plan's ACP Representative Contribution Rate is the lowest ACP Applicable Contribution Rate of any ACP Participants who are NHCEs in a group consisting of: (A) any one-half of the ACP Participants who are NHCEs for the Plan Year; or (B) if it would result in a greater Representative Contribution Rate than under clause (A), all of the ACP Participants who are NHCEs and who are employed by the Employer on the last day of the Plan Year.
ACP. For purposes of determining the ACP in accordance with Section 1.3 of the Agreement, the average dollar amount received for each Assay performed by LABCORP and its Affiliates and sub-licensees will be calculated by [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/, as follows: ACP for any month shall be calculated as [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/. The calculation of ACP shall expressly exclude [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/, and shall also expressly exclude [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/. As of the Effective Date, the [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/, and therefore the Parties acknowledge that the payments accounted through [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/ will serve as an acceptable basis for determining the average dollar amount received for each applicable Assay under the Agreement. However, if for any month during the Term of this Agreement [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]/*/, then the Parties will use their best efforts to promptly determine a new system or manner in which to determine the average dollar amount received for each Assay performed by LABCORP and its Affiliates that is acceptable to both Parties.
ACP. 230-grain Golden Sabre HP 9-mm, 147-grain GDHP Dry v50 – 9mm SXT 127gr +P+ 1604 ft. /s (489m/s) Wet P-BFS Avg. – 9mm SXT 27gr +P+ 31.6 mm @ 1340 ft. /s +/-30 Dry v50 – 357sig 125gr GDHP 1642 ft. /s (500m/s) Wet P-BFS Avg. – 357sig 125gr GDHP 31 mm @ 1470 ft. /s +/-30 *Wet v50 - 2gr RCC 2710 ft. /s (826m/s) *Wet v50 - 4gr RCC 2424 ft. /s (739m/s) *Wet v50 - 16gr RCC 2047 ft. /s (624m/s) *Dry v50 - 17gr FSP 1912 ft. /s (583m/s) *Wet v50 - 64gr RCC 1644 ft. /s (501m/s) **Panels shall have a five-year warranty. ** All contractors shall submit with proposal submission, certified V50 test reports for each vest proposed. Concealable Body Armor Carrier Specifications Configuration Each individual piece of soft body armor must be provided with two removable covers in order to allow the removal of the ballistic components when laundering the outer shell or carrier. Each front and back vest carrier shall be pocket shaped to securely retain the ballistic panels. The pockets shall have a zippered pocket for easy insertion and removal of the ballistic panels. The outer carrier fabric shall be Supplex. The straps shall be constructed of woven elastic. The closure system shall be configured in an 8-point adjustable design. The carrier shall have a two-year warranty. Each vest shall be of a slip-on construction and must be adjustable at 8-points in the chest, shoulder, and waist areas. Each vest is to be cut with sufficient armhole room so as not to irritate or restrict the wearer from performing "normal" duties. The front ballistic panel shall leave enough room between the vest and the duty belt so as not to cause "push up” under the chin when the wearer is seated in an automobile. Each model vest delivered shall provide front, back, and side protection. The offered vest shall provide front protection from just below the collarbone at each shoulder and have a scooped neck to allow concealment in a standard uniform shirt. Side protection shall be attained from the front and back panels wrapping around the torso and meeting at the side of the body with a minimum of 1 ½ inch overlap. There must be a pouch located on the upper midsection of the outside front panel and rear panel of the carrier to accommodate a 5" x 8" to 7”x 9” trauma reduction device. Protection from the back panel will be attained from an area even with the shoulder blade and having a lesser scooped neck for maximum protection, extend toward and around the waist just above the duty belt. All corners of the ...
ACP. African, Caribbean and Pacific Group. In 1975, only 46 ACP countries participated in the Convention. The number of participating countries went up to 57 in 1979, then 66 in 1984, and finally 70 in 1990. Many ACP countries are micro-states. As of the Lomé agreements (1975, 1979, 1984, 1989), relationships between the EEC2 and ACP countries received even greater focus. The Cotonou (Benin) Agreement, signed in 2000 between the EU and 77 ACP countries, marked a profound change in the relationship between partners. The change in philosophy was radical. Cotonou imposed the gradual implementation of a free-trade-based commercial framework, requiring relationships to be based on a new form of governance that also affected aid modalities. In this new philosophy, governance is central. The EU defends the establishment of a new governance in the EU / ACP3 relationship, no longer characterized by the relationship between former colonial peoples / colonized peoples, or donor / beneficiaries, State to State, but by equality among parties, common interests, and integration of civil society and private sector in trade4. The EU intends to establish this new governance of international economic relations by means of Economic Partnership Agreements. In other words, it intends to focus on the logic of “Arguing” rather than in the logic of “Bargaining”5 (Xxxxx, 2000). In addition, the EU calls upon ACP countries to adopt good governance (democratic governance) and create governance indicators according to which ACP countries will be judged. However, many ACP countries dispute the use of the concept of governance by the EU, considering it pure rhetoric and an instrument of power and influence aiming to establish a new center(EU)-periphery(ACP) dependence in the new context of globalization. The controversy came to light during the negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), which started in 2002 and were supposed to end by December 2007, but actually continued in 2008 and 2009. From the onset of negotiations, the European Commission affirms its commitment with the search for the truth, the common good, and consensus, but was unable to convince ACP countries, which benefited from the support of
ACP. Ambac Credit Products, LLC.
ACP. EC cooperation, underpinned by a legally binding system and the existence of joint institutions, shall be exercised on the basis of the following fundamental principles: - equality between partners, respect for their sovereignty, mutual interest and interdependence; - the right of each State to determine its own political, social, cultural and economic policy options; - security of their relations based on the acquis of their system of cooperation.
ACP. EU Trade Regime issues: Future EU Trade policy, Update on FTA with third countries, Rules of Origin, Commodities
a) Future EU Trade policy
b) Update on negotiations with third countries
