Aggregation rules. For purposes of this subsection—
(A) all persons receiving periodic pay- ments described in paragraph (1) with re- spect to the same insured shall be treated as 1 person, and
(B) the per diem limitation determined under paragraph (2) shall be allocated first to the insured and any remaining limitation shall be allocated among the other such per- sons in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe.
Aggregation rules. If several PGMs and/or items of equipment composing a BS Restoration Facility and connected to the same connection point are needed in order to meet the obligations described in Art. III.3.3, they should be able to work together in such a way that they operate in a similar way to a single PGM on the high-voltage grid. Moreover, these PGMs composing the same BS Restoration Facility must distribute their contribution in such a way as to maximise the dynamic stability margin.
Aggregation rules. (a) If this Plan provides contributions or benefits for one or more Owner-Employees who control both the business for which this Plan is established and one or more other trades or businesses, this Plan and the plan established for other trades or businesses must, when looked at as a single plan, satisfy Sections 1165(a) and (g) of the PR Code for the Employees of this and all other trades or businesses.
(b) If the Plan provides contributions or benefits for one or more Owner-Employees who control one or more other trades or businesses, the employees of the other trades or businesses must be included in a plan which satisfies Section 1165(a) of the PR Code and which provides contributions and benefits not less favorable than provided for Owner-Employees under this Plan.
(c) If an individual is covered as an Owner-Employee under the plans of two or more trades or businesses which are not controlled and the individual controls a trade or business, then the contribution or benefits which are controlled must be as favorable as those provided for him under the most favorable plan of the trade or business which is not controlled.
(d) For purposes of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), an Owner- Employee, or two or more Owner-Employees, will be considered to control a trade or business if the Owner-Employee, or two or more Owner-Employees together:
(i) own the entire interest in an unincorporated trade or business; or
(ii) in the case of a special partnership, own more than fifty percent (50%) of either the capital interest or the profit interest in a special partnership. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an Owner-Employee, or two or more Owner-Employees shall be treated as owning an interest in a partnership which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a partnership which such Owner-Employee, or such two or more Owner-Employees, are considered to control within the meaning of the preceding sentence.
Aggregation rules. All persons which are treated as a single em- ployer under subsections (a) and (b) of section 52 shall be treated as a single taxpayer.
Aggregation rules. For purposes of subsections 4.6 and 4.10, all salary reduction contributions and Employer matching contributions made under two or more plans that are aggregated for purposes of Code Sections 401(a)(4) and 410(b) (other than Code Section 410(b)(2)(A)(ii)) are to be treated as made under a single plan; and if two or more plans are aggregated for purposes of Sections 401(k) or 401(m), the aggregated plans must satisfy Code Sections 410(b) and 401(a)(4) as if they were a single plan. A Highly Compensated Employee’s deferral percentage under subsection 4.6 and contribution percentage under subsection 4.10 shall be determined by treating all cash or deferred arrangements under which such employee is eligible as one arrangement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this subsection 4.11 shall not apply to the portion of the Plan that is a collectively bargained plan to the extent permitted by Treasury Regulations.
Aggregation rules. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Plan shall not be considered a Top-Heavy Plan if it is part of either a "required aggregation group" or a "permissive aggregation group" and such aggregation group is not top-heavy. An aggregation group will be considered top-heavy if the sum of the present value of accrued benefits and account balances of Key Employees is more than sixty percent (60%) of the sum of the present value of accrued benefits and account balances for all Employees.
Aggregation rules. The organisation has attained delegated control over one issue, but is likely to have little leverage over organisations that have similar or related tasks, and coordination mechanisms might be lacking. Control over Types of RBOs Typical institutional design features the decisions of the organisation rests with an appointed leadership, which depends on fulfilment of that mission for its continuation. Natural science, engineering and economics play dominant roles in the decisions of the organisation (rational decision making), but cost-effectiveness is the main guiding principle.
Aggregation rules. The organisation is in full control over the issues over its jurisdiction. In certain cases, control over the decisions of the organisation may rest with an elected body, in others it will rest with an appointed and independent leadership. Natural science, engineering and economics play dominant roles in the decisions of the organisation (rational decision making); technical quality of its work is of the highest importance to the organisation. The organisation may have veto power over decisions by other government bodies that affect water.
Aggregation rules. These prescribe formulae for weighing individual choices and calculating collective choices. Aggregation rules relate to tensions between individual interests and ways of determining collective choices when these interests are different. At a low level of abstraction, aggregation rules can stress majority or consensus in certain fora (for example, in a municipal council) as an appropri- ate condition for taking a decision. At a somewhat higher level of 10 The politics of river basin organisations abstraction, aggregation rules are about the philosophical motivation for the decision. One possible aggregation rule is ‘the greatest good for the greatest number of people’. In other words, the good decision is the decision that maximises utility for all (utilitarianism). Even though some may lose a bit because of a certain decision, this may be accept- able if the rest of society greatly benefits. Another aggregation rule could stress justice or equity and thus forms of compensation. In this sense, aggregation rules point to the ‘type of rationality’ that needs to be achieved in the decision process (Xxxxxxx 1962).
Aggregation rules. For purposes of this paragraph— ‘‘(i) all sales or exchanges which are part of the same transaction (or a series of related trans- actions) shall be treated as one sale or exchange, and
