Agreement in Principle. A copy of the agreement in principle is enclosed. Your attention is drawn to –
Agreement in Principle. This MOU sets forth an agreement in principle among the undersigned concerning the terms and conditions of Federal assistance to be provided by the Department for the transportation projects described herein. This MOU represents solely the intent of the parties (including, without limitation, the intent of the Department to allocate funds as set forth in Section 4(a) below), and no party shall be legally bound hereby. Any agreement between the Department and the Urban Partner concerning funding of the transportation projects described herein shall be set forth in a grant agreement (or a series of grant agreements) (the “Grant Agreements”) to be negotiated and executed by the parties to this MOU. The Department reserves the right, in its discretion, not to fund the transportation projects (or any part thereof) described in this MOU or otherwise set forth in the application filed by the Urban Partner to the Urban Partnership Program.
Agreement in Principle. This Agreement in Principle (also referred to as “Agreement” hereafter) reflects: • the current understanding and intentions of Canada, British Columbia and UBCM; • the understanding that the Parties intend to execute a legally binding final contribution agreement once that agreement is finalized as promptly as possible; • that all Parties, as appropriate, will need to refer such finalized agreement to their respective authorities for review, approval and mandate to sign a final legally binding contribution agreement; • that Parliamentary approval will be required before funding is available and may be disbursed; and, • that nothing in this Agreement precludes the Parties from including additional elements to a final contribution agreement. The Parties agree that in the case of a discrepancy between this section and any other portion of this Agreement, this section shall prevail.
Agreement in Principle. Except for Paragraph 1 hereof, this Agreement is only a conceptual overview of the recapitalization of Malibu and the other matters discussed herein. Additional reasonable details regarding such transactions (consistent with the terms of this Agreement) will be agreed upon by the parties and reflected in the final documentation. Executed as of the date first above written. NOMURA ASSET CAPITAL CORPORATION By: /s/ STUAXX XXXXX ----------------------------- Name: Stuaxx Xxxxx Title: Director
Agreement in Principle. In April 2015, a qui tam civil lawsuit entitled United States ex rel. Xxxxx v. Berkeley HeartLab, Inc., et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, was unsealed. The complaint alleges that certain alleged business practices of the defendants violate the False Claims Act, and seeks monetary relief. The United States has intervened as a plaintiff as to Berkeley HeartLab, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company and filed a complaint in intervention; the United States did not intervene as a plaintiff as to Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. The parties have reached an agreement in principle to resolve these matters, subject to further negotiation of terms and conditions and governmental sign-offs. In order to most efficiently and effectively finalize the settlement agreement, the parties have agreed to stay the filing of certain pleadings and their respective discovery requests associated with these matters.
Agreement in Principle the Canada-Quebec Agreement in Principle on the Parental Insurance Plan signed by the Parties on May 21, 2004.
Agreement in Principle. This agreement formally recognizes that Southern Regional Technical College (SRTC) and Georgia Military College (GMC) are committed to the establishment of an educational partnership to better serve currently enrolled and future students at both institutions, as well as support economic and workforce development in the communities we serve. Both parties agree to exercise due diligence in providing as smooth and complete a transition as possible for students who elect to transfer to GMC from SRTC. The two institutions are entering into a transfer Articulation Agreement in support of Complete College Georgia to assist and promote the transferability of courses from the SRTC Associate of Applied Science degrees to the G MC Bachelor of Applied Science (BAS) degrees. Further, both parties pledge their support for future collaborative efforts as may be identified and needed to support the needs of our students, as well as the economic and workforce development needs of the communities we serve.
Agreement in Principle. The Stage 2 M-DBP Federal Advisory Committee (Stage 2 FACA) considered both the strengths and limitations of new M-DBP information as well as the related technical and policy issues involved in developing a Stage 2 DBPR and a LT2ESWTR under the Safe Drinking Water Act and recommends that the Environmental Protection Agency base the applicable sections of its anticipated Stage 2 DBPR and LT2ESWTR proposals on the elements of agreement described below. This agreement in principle Part A and B represents the consensus of the parties on the best conceptual principles that the Committee was able to generate within the allocated time and resources available. The , a party to the negotiations, agrees that:
Agreement in Principle. 15.1 An Agreement-in-Principle reflects the agreements reached on the substantive issues for negotiation. It is the basis for the negotiation of the Final Agreement and will include agreement on ratification procedures.
Agreement in Principle. 14.2.1 The Agreement-in-Principle shall be submitted to the parties for ratification after initialling by the negotiators for the parties.
