BASE PATENTS Sample Clauses

BASE PATENTS. Exhibit A sets forth as of the Effective Date an accurate, correct and complete list of patents and patent applications owned or licensed by ALTUS that constitute Base Patents. To the knowledge of ALTUS, the Base Patents that are issued are valid and enforceable ALTUS owns and possesses all right, title and interest, or holds a valid license, in and to the Base Patents, free of any lien, charge or encumbrance and no other Person has been granted by ALTUS any rights in such with respect to the Licensed Product in the Territory. No claim has been asserted threatened by any person regarding the use or licensing by ALTUS of the Base Patents. To the knowledge of ALTUS, its use of the Base Patents does not violate or infringe, and has not in the past violated or infringed the rights of any Third Party, and no claims have been asserted by ALTUS against any other person claiming infringement of the Base Patents. As of the Effective Date, ALTUS has no knowledge of any Third Party patent or patent application that would be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business and operations to be conducted by either Party as contemplated by this Agreement; ALTUS is not aware of any Patents or Patent applications that would prevent the development, use and sale of the Licensed Portions of this Exhibit were omitted and have been filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act. Product as contemplated by this Agreement. Additionally, as of the Effective Date, ALTUS has not received written notice from any Third Party that TheraCLEC-Total infringes on any patent or patent application owned by such Third Party that would have an adverse effect on the operations to be conducted in the Field in the Territory by the Parties under this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
BASE PATENTS. The Parties acknowledge that the Divestiture Agreement governs responsibility for enforcing the Base Patents. To the extent and only to the extent permitted by the Divestiture Agreement, the Parties agree that as between OSI and Roche, the following provision shall apply. OSI shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring any action or proceeding with respect to infringement of any such of the Base Patents in the Territory, by counsel of its own choice. If OSI chooses not to bring an action or proceeding in the Territory with respect to such a Base Patent within sixty (60) days of being notified of such infringement, then, to the extent permitted by the Divestiture Agreement, Roche shall have the right (but not the obligation) to bring such action in the Territory. The Party not in control may elect to contribute ** of the costs and expenses of such action or proceeding by providing written notice to the controlling Party within forty-five (45) days of the date such action or proceeding is first brought. Otherwise, the controlling party shall bring such action or proceeding at its own cost and expense. The Party not bringing such action or proceeding agrees to be joined as a party plaintiff if necessary to prosecute the action or proceeding and to give reasonable assistance and authority to file and prosecute the action or proceeding. Any damages or other monetary awards recovered from settlement or judgment from such an action or proceeding shall be allocated first to reimburse the costs and expenses of the controlling Party, then to reimburse the costs and expenses, if any, of the other Party (except for costs associated with the other Party being represented by counsel of its own choice). If a single Party has paid the costs and expense of such action or proceeding, any amounts remaining shall be paid to such Party. **.
BASE PATENTS. Memory shall have the right, but not the obligation, to prepare, file, prosecute (including interference and opposition proceedings) and maintain (including interferences, re-examination and opposition proceedings) (collectively, "Handle") the Base Patents. Memory shall use reasonable efforts to consult with Roche as to the Handling of the Base Patents in sufficient time (for example 30 days for instances where actions are due within 3 months of a communication from a Patent Office) before any action is due to allow Roche to provide comments thereon, which comments Memory must reasonably consider if provided to Memory at least thirty (30) days before such action is due. Should Memory decide that it does not desire to Handle a Base Patent in a given country, it shall provide written notice to Roche thereof no less than sixty (60) days prior to the date when the Base Patent would become abandoned in such country. After receiving such notice, Roche may, but is not obligated, to Handle the Base Patent in such country. (i) Except as provided in Section 13.2 (a)(ii) and (iii) below, Memory shall be responsible for payment of the reasonable costs to Handle the Base Patents. (ii) Roche will assume and pay for the reasonable costs to Handle any given Base Patents as described in Schedule A as Memory 1, 2 and 3 in Europe from and after national phase entry in Europe. For a given Base Patent as described in Schedule A as Memory 1, 2 and 3 no less than three (3) months before PCT national phase entry, Roche shall provide to Memory in writing a list of countries, other than the US and Europe, for which Roche requests that a national phase entry be filed ("Other Countries"). Unless the Parties otherwise agree after discussion in good faith, such list shall include Japan and additional countries, consistent with Roche's practices for Roche's other potential products. Roche shall be responsible for the payment of the reasonable costs to Handle the Base Patents as described in Schedule A as Memory 1, 2 and 3 in the Other Countries. [*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED (iii) For a given Base Patent in a given country for which Roche shall be responsible under Section 13.2(a)(ii) for the payment of the reasonable costs to Handle such Base Patent, Roche may elect, at its option, to discontinue the payment of such costs, upon giving at least ninety (90) day's prior written notice to Memory. At Memory's request, Roche shall advise to the specific reasons for such decision. M...
BASE PATENTS. To the extent any Base Patents or other Stressgen Patent Rights are licensed to Stressgen under the MIT Agreement (collectively, “MIT Patents”), the provisions of this Section 12.2 shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the MIT Agreement, and this Section 12.2 shall in no event be construed to confer on Roche any right with respect to the Handling (as defined below) of any such MIT Patents. Stressgen shall prepare, file, prosecute (including interference and opposition proceedings) and maintain (including interferences, re-examination and opposition proceedings) (collectively, “Handle”) the Base Patents (excluding any MIT Patents), at Stressgen’s expense. Stressgen shall use reasonable efforts to consult with Roche as to the Handling of all Base Patents in sufficient time (for example 30 days for instances where actions are due within 3 months of a communication from a Patent Office) before any action is due to allow Roche to provide comments thereon, which comments Stressgen must reasonably consider if provided to Stressgen at least thirty (30) days before such action is due. Should Stressgen decide that it does not desire to Handle a Target Product-Specific Base Patent in a given country, it shall advise Roche thereof no less than sixty (60) days prior to the date when the Target Product-Specific Base Patent would become abandoned in such country. At the written request of Roche, Stressgen shall then, at no cost to Stressgen, assign to Roche such Target Product-Specific Base Patent in such country, and Roche may thereafter Handle the same in Roche’s name, at Roche’s own cost, to the extent that Roche desires to do so. For purposes of clarification, as between the Parties Stressgen shall have sole control over, and decision-making authority with respect to, the Handling of Base Patents to the extent the scope of claims relates to subject matter other than Target Product.

Related to BASE PATENTS

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Licensed Patents 9.1.1 Oculis shall be responsible for and shall have the exclusive right with respect to, the preparation, filing, prosecution, protection, maintenance and enforcement of all Patent Rights in respect of the Licensed Technology in its discretion using its patent counsel. Oculis shall consult with Accure with respect thereto, supply Accure with a copy of the application as filed, together with notice of its filing date and serial number; and keep Accure advised of the status of actual and prospective Patent Right filings, including office actions, and keep Accure informed about and provide copies of all the relevant information exchanged between Oculis and the different Industrial or Intellectual Property Registration Offices regarding the prosecution, maintenance, defense and enforcement of the Licensed Patents. The cost and expense of filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing all Licensed Patents shall be borne by Oculis. Accure shall, and hereby procures its personnel will, provide all requested information and perform all acts reasonably requested by Oculis in connection with the prosecution, maintenance, defense or enforcement of the Licensed Technology. Without limiting the foregoing, Accure and its Affiliates may not file for further Patent Rights relating to Licensed Technology. 9.1.2 Should Oculis not be interested in the prosecution, defense and maintenance of any or all of the Licensed Patents, and/or Xxxxxx decides not to pay all reasonable and necessary expenses with respect to the prosecution, defense or maintenance of any Licensed Patent before any upcoming deadline, Oculis shall give reasonable advance notice to Accure (no less than [***]), and subsequent to such notice Accure shall act as it deems appropriate in connection with the prosecution, defense and maintenance of the Licensed Patents at their discretion and at their own cost. As from such notification, Oculis shall not be responsible for costs associated with such Licensed Patents, and, where such notification is provided following such time as Xxxxxx assumes responsible for performing patenting matters as set forth above, Oculis shall not be responsible for the preparation, filing, prosecution, protection and maintenance of the mentioned Licensed Patents and such Patent Rights shall cease to be Licensed Patents and the provisions of Agreement shall be of no further effect with respect to such patent and/or country of the Territory.

  • Licensed Patent Rights The term “Licensed Patent Rights” shall mean rights arising out of or resulting from:

  • Trademarks, Patents Each of the Borrower and the Subsidiaries possesses or has the right to use all of the patents, trademarks, trade names, service marks and copyrights, and applications therefor, and all technology, know-how, processes, methods and designs used in or necessary for the conduct of its business, without known conflict with the rights of others.

  • Joint Patent Rights If not already established under the Research Collaboration Agreement, prior to either Party filing any Patent Right disclosing Joint Program Technology or Joint Probody Platform Improvements, the Parties shall establish a patent committee (the “Patent Committee”) comprised of at least one (1) representative of each Party for the purpose of facilitating the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance and defense of Joint Patent Rights. As agreed upon by the Parties, meetings of the Patent Committee may be face-to-face or may be conducted by teleconferences or videoconferences, from time to time as needed. The Patent Committee will be the forum through which the Parties coordinate their respective obligations to each other described in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 hereof and in this Section. In the event the Parties conceive or generate any Joint Program Technology or Joint Probody Platform Improvements, the Parties shall promptly meet to discuss and determine, based on mutual consent, whether to seek patent protection thereon, which Party will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents and how to pay for the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents. It is presumed that ImmunoGen will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Program Technology or Joint Conjugation Probody Platform Improvements, and that CytomX will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Unconjugated Probody Platform Improvements. Neither Party will file any Joint Patent Right without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Party controlling filing and prosecution of any such Joint Patent Right (a) shall keep the other Party informed regarding each Patent Right, (b) shall consider in good faith any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to the filing, prosecution or maintenance of any such Patent Right and (c) shall not unreasonably refuse to incorporate any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to such filing, prosecution or maintenance.

  • Prosecution of Patents (a) Licensed [***] Patents, Licensed Product Improvement Patents, and Joint Patents relating to Licensed Products. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 12.3(a), as between the Parties, Takeda shall have the sole right and authority to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain the Licensed [***] Patent, Licensed Product Improvement Patents, and, where relating to Licensed Products, Joint Patents (collectively, the “[***] Patent Prosecution”) on a worldwide basis (including the right to defend in patent office proceedings such as inter partes reviews, post grant reviews and oppositions).Takeda shall bear all costs of preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the [***] Patent Prosecution in the Territory. Provided that Ultragenyx’s rights with respect to the applicable Licensed Product have not terminated, Takeda, upon Ultragenyx’s request, shall provide Ultragenyx a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on material communications from any patent authority in the Territory regarding the [***] Patent Prosecution and drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities in advance of submitting such filings or responses. Takeda shall consider Ultragenyx’s comments regarding such communications and drafts in good faith with a view to maximizing the Patent protection and scope in the Territory in the Ultragenyx Field. If Ultragenyx’s rights with respect to the applicable Licensed Product have not terminated and Takeda determines in its sole discretion to abandon or not maintain any Licensed [***] Patent, Licensed Product Improvement Patent, or, where relating to Licensed Products, Joint Patent that is being prosecuted or maintained by Takeda in the Territory and that is applicable to the in the Ultragenyx Field, then Takeda shall provide Ultragenyx with written notice of such determination within a period of time reasonably necessary to allow Ultragenyx to determine, in its sole discretion, its interest in such Patent(s) (which notice by Takeda shall be given no later than sixty (60) days prior to the final deadline for any pending action or response that may be due with respect to such Patent(s) with the applicable patent authority). If Ultragenyx provides timely written notice expressing its interest in continuing to support such Patent(s), Ultragenyx shall have the right to pursue the filing or support the continued prosecution or maintenance of such Patents and Takeda shall provide to Ultragenyx, subject to reimbursement of Takeda’s out-of-pocket costs, all unpublished patent applications and any other information and documents necessary to permit Ultragenyx to take such action to establish or preserve any such Patents. If Ultragenyx pursues the filing or support of such Patents and Takeda continues to pursue a Licensed [***] Product in the Takeda Field, it shall provide Takeda a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on material communications from any patent authority in the Territory regarding such Patents and drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities in advance of submitting such filings or responses. Ultragenyx shall consider Takeda’s comments regarding such communications and drafts in good faith.

  • Third Party Patent Rights No Party makes any warranty with respect to the validity, perfection or dominance of any Patent or other proprietary right or with respect to the absence of rights in Third Parties which may be infringed by the manufacture or sale of the Licensed Product. Each Party agrees to bring to the attention of the other Party any patent or patent application it discovers, or has discovered, and which relates to the subject matter of this Agreement.

  • Trademarks, Patents, Etc Schedule 2.1

  • Joint Patents With respect to any potentially patentable Joint Invention, the Parties shall meet and agree upon which Party shall prosecute and maintain Patent applications covering such Joint Invention (any such Patent application and any Patents issuing therefrom, a “Joint Patent”) in particular countries and jurisdictions throughout the world. Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, Xxxxxx will prosecute and maintain any Joint Patents in the Licensed Territory, and Onconova will prosecute and maintain the Joint Patents outside the Licensed Territory, subject to the Parties coordinating their efforts as appropriate to make such prosecution activities as efficient, convenient, and harmonious as possible. The Parties ** all expenses of filing, prosecuting and maintaining such Joint Patents. The Party that prosecutes a Joint Patent (the “Prosecuting Party”) shall provide the other Party the opportunity to review and comment on any and all such prosecution efforts regarding the applicable Joint Patent in the particular jurisdictions, and such other Party shall provide the Prosecuting Party reasonable assistance in such efforts; provided that the Prosecuting Party shall have final control over such prosecution efforts after reasonably considering the other Party’s comments, if any. The Prosecuting Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of all material communications from any Patent authority in the applicable jurisdictions regarding the Joint Patent being prosecuted by such Party, and shall provide drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities a reasonable amount of time in advance of submitting such filings or responses. In particular, each Party agrees to provide the other Party with all information necessary or desirable to enable the other Party to comply with any duty of candor and/or duty of disclosure requirements of any Patent authority. Except to the extent a Party is restricted by the licenses granted by such Party to the other Party under the terms of this Agreement, and/or the other covenants contained in this Agreement, each Party shall be entitled to practice, and grant licenses to Third Parties and Affiliates of such Third Parties to practice, the Joint Patents and all Joint Inventions without restriction or an obligation to account to the other Party, and the other Party shall consent and hereby consents, without additional consideration, to any and all such licenses.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!