BEACONING EVALUATION STANDARD Sample Clauses

BEACONING EVALUATION STANDARD. ‌ The purpose of the BEACONING pilot studies is to build a model that predicts the level of acceptance of BEACONING technology by authors (learning designers), teachers and students. The relationships among variables associated with factors that influence technology acceptance as indicated in Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) will be calculated. TAM 3 is a de facto industry standard16. Data will be collected through survey questionnaires and structured dialogues with both teachers and students. Employing structural equation modelling, a set of predictions will be made about the actual end-user behaviour to test the model fitness. 16 xxxxx://xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/wiki/Technology_acceptance_model 4 BEACONING AND DATA STANDARDS‌ Deliverable D4.6 Game Analytics and Adaptation Component Design (M12) covers both IMS Caliper and ADL xAPI standards. It argues for the reasons for choosing the ADL xAPI standard as “versatility and lack of constraints of xAPI to define new vocabulary for the statements.” Furthermore, the Experience API (xAPI) Statement Data Model and xAPI Profile17 is given, to explain the profile can contain new vocabularies along with extensions. One of these extension regards “Serious Games” and it is contributed by the BEACONING partner UCM. The xAPI Serious Games (xAPI-SG) Profile has been tested out with a case study by UCM, but the large scale piloting is intended to be in BEACONING project. 4.1 ADL EXPERIENCE API (XAPI) AND THE SERIOUS GAMES PROFILE‌ Deliverable D4.7 Game Analytics and Adaptation Components Reference Implementation (M24) describes in specific detail how the data will be collected during the execution on GLPs in the form of completion, selection and variable traces. These traces are stored in a Learning Records Store in implementation of the ADL xAPI standard. The xAPI statements for the traces would comply xAPI-SG Profile. Developed after analysing the most frequent interactions in SGs, the xAPI-SG Profile specifies the verbs, activities and extensions to be used for the information sent by the game. It has been implemented and it is accessible online18. By performing analytics on the traces, the system can issue alerts, warnings and even trigger interventions by means of the adaptive components of BEACONING such as the Procedural Content Generation. Specifics of procedural content generation will be described in D4.4 which is due M26 (end of February 2018). The analytics operation that will be performed on SGs in order to info...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to BEACONING EVALUATION STANDARD

  • Construction Standards The Developer shall construct the Subdivision in accordance with the Subdivision Plan, as approved by the Planning Commission, and if applicable, the requirements of the Design Review Committee, and in accordance with the requirements of (a) the Millington Subdivision Regulations; (b) standards and specifications contained in “Local Public Works Standard, and Specifications”, as amended to include specific requirements for construction in Millington, TN; (c) the Building Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (d) the Fire Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (e) the Millington Zoning Ordinance; and (f) the applicable Ordinances of the City. Items (a) through (f) are hereby made a part of this Agreement by reference and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Codes”. References herein to the Codes are to those in effect on the Effective Date unless amendments are hereafter made which apply to all improvements or subdivisions regardless of their date of commencement and/or completion of construction. The Conditions of Approval established by the Planning Commission, and, as applicable, the Design Review Committee (any or all of which as may have been modified by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen) are set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Agreement and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

  • Reformulation Standard “Reformulated Products” shall mean Products that contain concentrations less than or equal to 0.1% (1,000 parts per million (ppm)) of DEHP when analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency testing methodologies 3580A and 8270C or other methodology utilized by federal or state government agencies for the purpose of determining the phthalate content in a solid substance.

  • Reformulation Standards A “reformulated” product (a) contains lead in concentrations that do not exceed 90 parts per million, equivalent to 0.009%, in any exterior parts analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies 3050B and 6010B, or (b) yields a result of no more than 1.0 micrograms of lead when sampled according to NIOSH 9100 protocol and analyzed according to EPA 6010B. In addition to the above tests, the Settling Entity may use equivalent methods utilized by any California or federal agency to determine lead content in a solid substance or the amount of the bioavailability of the toxicant through a wipe test, respectively.

  • Institution Standards Residents are also responsible for reading, understanding and adhering to the academic and non-academic policies and procedures that have been established by the Institution, including the Code of Conduct and its penalties.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Mission Statement a. Employees are the most valuable resource in the City’s effective and efficient delivery of services to the public. The parties have a commitment to prevent drug or alcohol impairment in the workplace and to xxxxxx and maintain a drug and alcohol free work environment. The parties also have a mutual interest in preventing accidents and injuries on the job and, by doing so, protecting the health and safety of employees, co-workers, and the public. b. In agreeing to implement this Substance Abuse Prevention Policy (XXXX), the parties affirm their belief that substance abuse is a treatable condition. The City is committed to identifying needed resources, both in and outside of the City, for employees who voluntarily seek assistance in getting well. Those employees who voluntarily seek treatment prior to any testing shall not be subject to any repercussions or any potential adverse action for doing so. However, seeking treatment will not excuse prior conduct for which an investigation or disciplinary proceedings have been initiated. c. The City is committed to preventing drug or alcohol impairment in the workplace, and to fostering and maintaining a safe work environment free from alcohol and prohibited drugs at all of its work sites and facilities. In addition, the City maintains a drug and alcohol free workplace policy in its Employee Handbook.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!