Case Östersundom Sample Clauses

Case Östersundom. The best results from the GA-optimisation are shown together with those generated by the workshop participants in Table 8 and Table 9 respectively. Based on GA-optimization results the lowest cost and environmental impact is achieved with high share of renewables and highly distributed production and storage capacity. Furthermore the results demonstrate the advantage of the Planning Tool which finds quickly good solutions whenever there are numerous alternatives. This can be seen in the improved results from the GA-optimization compared to results from user-defined scenarios. The GA-optimisation run for 4 hours during which 1840 different scenarios were generated. This amount was too large for the Planning Tool to handle and was processed in another software (database). The data management would be one subject for further improvements of the tool. The amount of scenarios per time unit generated by the genetic algorithm depends on the computational power available. The more calculation capacity the more scenarios will be generated per time unit. The parameters of each GA-scenario were verified and concluded to be within the user-given boundaries. Also the best scenarios were examined by the experts in order to verify if the given parameters were sound. The conclusion is that with the Planning Tool several good solutions instead of one best solution can be found and the value weighing has to be done by the user. One of the biggest disadvantages realized was that the results are highly dependent on the accuracy of the external inputs such as prices, emission levels and the detail level of the simulation model. Urban planning is usually about planning a future area where many factors are still unknown. This leads to predictions which in the end could make optimisation results less dependable. The results from both user-determined and GA-optimisation generated scenarios are further analysed in Deliverable 4.1.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Case Östersundom. A remarkable disadvantage of the Östersundom case is that the actual district has not yet been constructed and the pilot at the School of Sakarinmäki represents only a fraction what it comes to the size of the simulated energy system. All available data used in the simulations is based on urban plans that might change with time during the realization of the district. However, this could pose as an advantage at the same time. Through the results of the CITYOPT planning tool, the parties involved can have information what good solutions have in common and use this information in the beginning of new pilot and construction projects in Östersundom. This would save time and reduce the risks for investments. To attain improved results, the models need to be calibrated and the data (prices, efficiencies etc.) updated along with the evolvement of the Östersundom area. In case Östersundom the optimisation results showed that there are several good ways to reach good results to be used in urban planning. This means that there are several alternatives to do urban planning that would eventually lead to better renewable energy utilization and cheaper energy procurements. Since Östersundom is going to be built gradually, it would be necessary to re-run the case Östersundom with updated data to ensure that the best alternatives for the district are found. Furthermore, control strategies and optimal settings for existing systems can later be examined by the CITYOPT Planning Tool in order to improve the energy efficiency on a more detailed level.

Related to Case Östersundom

  • Dimensions Education Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science, Information Systems, or a related field. Or equivalent work experience. Experience: A minimum of 3 years of IT work experience in production and operations support.

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.01 For purposes of this Agreement, a grievance is defined as a difference arising between the parties relating to the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the Agreement including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

  • HEALTH AND SAFETY 16.01 The Employer, Union and the employees shall comply with the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act where and when applicable. The Employer shall provide working conditions at all times which are not prejudicial to the health or efficiency of the workers. Employees are required to report to their Employer any unsafe work conditions, or violation of any safe work policies or procedures established by the Employer, or any violation of relevant safe work legislation.

  • Training a. The employer, in consultation with the local, shall be responsible for developing and implementing an ongoing harassment and sexual harassment awareness program for all employees. Where a program currently exists and meets the criteria listed in this agreement, such a program shall be deemed to satisfy the provisions of this article. This awareness program shall initially be for all employees and shall be scheduled at least once annually for all new employees to attend.

  • Background 1.1. The “Work” is the research article, review article, letter, clinical trial study, report, article, or other copyright work, as identified in the Copyright Letter and further detailed in Schedule 1: Details of the Work (including such form of the copyright work submitted to Xxxxxxx Science for publication pursuant to clause 4, below), but excluding (except where context otherwise requires) any diagrams, figures or illustration specifically identified to Xxxxxxx Science pursuant to clause 3.2, below.

  • Safety Where an employee is prevented from working at the employee’s particular function as a result of unsafe conditions caused by the inclement weather, the employee may be transferred to other work in the employee’s classification on site, until the unsafe conditions are rectified. Where such alternative is not available and until the unsafe conditions are rectified, the employee shall remain on site. The employee shall be paid for such time without reduction of the employees’ inclement weather entitlement.

  • Bereavement Leave (a) Upon the death of an employee's spouse, spouse to include same sex partner, child or stepchild, an employee shall be granted leave up to a maximum of five (5) continuous calendar days without loss of pay. One of the days of leave shall include the day of the funeral or equivalent service. Additional days off with or without pay may be granted by the Employer. Part-time employees will be credited with seniority and service for all such leave. In the event of a delayed interment or ceremony for reason of religion or other protected grounds under the Ontario Human Rights Code, an Employee may save one of the days identified above without loss of pay to attend the interment or ceremony.

  • Scope of Services The specific scope of work for each job shall be determined in advance and in writing between TIPS Member, Member’s design professionals and Vendor. It is permitted for the TIPS Member to provide a general scope description, but the awarded vendor should provide a written scope of work, and if applicable, according to the TIPS Member’s design Professional as part of the proposal. Once the scope of the job is agreed to, the TIPS Member will issue a PO and/or an Agreement or Contract with the Job Order Contract Proposal referenced or as an attachment along with bond and any other special provisions agreed by the TIPS Member. If special terms and conditions other than those covered within this solicitation and awarded Agreements are required, they will be attached to the PO and/or an Agreement or Contract and shall take precedence over those in this base TIPS Vendor Agreement.

  • Life Insurance No portion of your IRA may be invested in life insurance contracts.

  • Personnel Files ‌ An employee, or his/her certified representative with the written consent of the employee, may inspect that employee's personnel file with the exception of all material obtained from other employers and agencies at the time that employee was hired. An employee shall be advised of, and entitled to read, any written statement by the employee's supervisor or departmental Management regarding his/her work performance or conduct if such statement is to be placed in his/her personnel file. The employee shall acknowledge that he/she has read such material by affixing his/her signature on the copy to be filed, with the understanding that such signature merely signifies that he/she has read the material to be filed but does not necessarily indicate agreement with its content. If the employee refuses to sign, the supervisor shall note his/her refusal on the copy to be filed along with the supervisor's signature and the signature of a witness to the employee's refusal to sign. The employee may file a grievance regarding any such document within the prescribed time limits of the grievance procedure. If the employee fails to file a grievance within the designated time limits, the document becomes part of the official file. If the employee does file a grievance within the designated time limits, said document shall not be placed in the official file nor referenced in any Performance Evaluation or Appraisal of Promotability until the grievance procedure or civil service appeal rights have been exhausted. Grievances filed under this provision shall not be subject to the Arbitration provisions of the Grievance Procedure unless they involve violation of a specific provision of this agreement. Management agrees that no properly used full paid sick leave used in the twelve months immediately prior to an Appraisal of Promotability or a Performance Evaluation will be referenced on such forms. The employee may attach his/her statement to any document within twenty (20) business days if he/she chooses not to file a grievance regarding such document or within ten (10) business days following final determination if he/she has filed a grievance regarding such document. On reviewing his/her personnel file, an employee may request and have any written warnings issued more than one year prior placed in an envelope and sealed in his/her personnel file except as such may be a part of an official permanent record. On the face of the sealed envelope it shall read "The contents herein shall be disclosed only upon written consent of the subject employee or by subpoena or other legal process from a public body of competent jurisdiction." The date the contents of the sealed envelope will be destroyed shall also appear on the face of envelope. That date shall be two (2) years from the date of issue of the documents in the sealed envelope. An employee on reviewing his/her personnel file, may request and have any written warnings or reprimand(s) issued more than two (2) years prior removed from his/her personnel file except as such may be a part of an official permanent record. All departments employing peace officers covered by the Peace Officers Bill of Rights shall comply with its provisions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.