Category WA-1: No DRBC Review Required Sample Clauses

Category WA-1: No DRBC Review Required. Water Withdrawal projects within the Delaware River Basin that are not subject to review under the Compact or Commission regulations or as defined in Section III.E. below;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Category WA-1: No DRBC Review Required. Under the Compact and DRBC regulations, the following water withdrawal projects are not subject to DRBC review except in accordance with either Section 2.3.5 B.18 (determination by the Executive Director) or Section 2.3.5 C. (request by a Commission member agency) of DRBC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (RPP). 1. A water withdrawal from groundwater or from impoundments or running streams for any purpose when the daily average gross withdrawal during any 30 consecutive days does not exceed 100,000 gallons. 2. Diversions into or out of the basin whenever the design capacity is less than a daily average rate of 100,000 gallons. 3. Withdrawals for agricultural use within the State of New Jersey. 4. Temporary dewatering permits to facilitate construction. (Such projects are determined to be “temporary or short term projects” in accordance with Section 2.3.5 A.19. of DRBC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure and to have no substantial effect on water resources of the basin.) 5. Any “minor modification of a water supply allocation permit or temporary dewatering permit,” as that term is defined at N.J.A.C. 7:19-1.5(b).
Category WA-1: No DRBC Review Required. Under the Compact and DRBC regulations, the following water allocation projects are not subject to DRBC review except by direction of the Commission in accordance with either Section 2.3.5 B.17. or Section 2.3.5 C. of the RPP (18 C.F.R. 401.35(b)(17) and 18 C.F.R. 401.35(c), respectively). (See Section IV of this Agreement for additional categories of projects that are generally not subject to the Commission’s review.) 1. A water allocation from groundwater or from an impoundment or running stream for any purpose when the daily average gross allocation during any 30 consecutive days does not exceed 100,000 gallons. 2. Diversions into or out of the basin whenever the design capacity is less than a daily average rate of 100,000 gallons. 3. Temporary dewatering permits to facilitate construction. (Such projects are determined to be “temporary or short term projects” in accordance with Section 2.3.5 A.19. of DRBC’s RPP (18 C.F.R. 401.35(a)(19)) and to have no substantial effect on water resources of the basin.) 4. Any “minor modification of a water supply allocation permit or temporary dewatering permit,” as that term is defined at N.J.A.C. 7:19-1.5(b).

Related to Category WA-1: No DRBC Review Required

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS 1. The Contractor certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Contractor’s workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;

  • Minimum Customer Support Requirements for TIPS Sales Vendor shall provide timely and commercially reasonable support for TIPS Sales or as agreed to in the applicable Supplemental Agreement.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of: i. Prohibiting the use of all forms of tobacco products, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, water pipes (hookah), bidis, kreteks, electronic cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snuff and chewing tobacco; ii. Designating the property to which this Policy applies as a "designated area,” which must at least comprise all buildings and structures where activities funded under this Grant Agreement are taking place, as well as Grantee owned, leased, or controlled sidewalks, parking lots, walkways, and attached parking structures immediately adjacent to this designated area; iii. Applying to all employees and visitors in this designated area; and iv. Providing for or referring its employees to tobacco use cessation services. B. If Grantee cannot meet these minimum standards, it must obtain a waiver from the System Agency.

  • Contractor Certification Regarding Ethics The Contractor certifies that the Contractor is now, and shall remain, in compliance with Chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service, throughout the term of this Contract.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION

  • Food Service Waste Reduction Requirements Contractor shall comply with the Food Service Waste Reduction Ordinance, as set forth in San Francisco Environment Code Chapter 16, including but not limited to the remedies for noncompliance provided therein.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!