Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility Sample Clauses

Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. People coming from downtown would travel a few miles further north of the current ferry terminal to reach the bridge crossing. For vehicles, the travel pattern would change only for those living between the ferry terminal and the new bridge. The residential neighborhoods along the hillside would be impacted because the bridge would traverse the hillside. For pedestrians and bicyclists, access to the recreational and new developable land available on Xxxxxxx Island would be gained by walking or riding over the bridge rather than riding across Tongass Narrows on the ferry. Depending on the starting location, this alternative might be more convenient for pedestrians and bicyclists than the existing ferry. Bicyclists and pedestrians would be impacted by the longer travel distance using the bridge rather than walking onto and riding across on the ferry—pedestrians would be affected more than bicyclists because of the longer travel time. This alternative would substantially improve access to Xxxxxxx Island because a 24-hour bridge access will be more convenient than a ferry.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. People coming from downtown would travel approximately 1.5 miles further north of the current airport ferry terminal to reach the bridge crossing. For vehicles, the travel pattern would change only for those living between the ferry terminal and the new bridge. For pedestrians and bicyclists, access to the recreation opportunities and new developable land available on Xxxxxxx Island would be gained by walking or riding over the bridge rather than using the airport ferry. Depending on the starting location, this alternative might be more convenient for pedestrians and bicyclists than the existing ferry. Bicyclists and pedestrians would be impacted by the longer travel distance using the bridge rather than walking onto and riding the ferry across the Tongass Narrows—pedestrians would be affected more than bicyclists because of the longer travel time. Convenience would likely increase for all modes of travel as a result of the more direct, unrestricted access provided by this alternative.
Sample 1
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. Some businesses and industrial areas on Revillagigedo Island would be impacted because land would need to be acquired for this alternative (see Land Use Impacts Technical Memorandum DRAFT, HDR Alaska, October, 2001 for more information). Travel patterns would only be altered slightly under this alternative. For pedestrians and bicyclists, access to the recreational and new developable land available on Xxxxxxx Island would be gained by walking or riding over the bridge rather than riding across on the ferry. Depending on the starting location, this alternative might be more convenient for pedestrians and bicyclists than the existing ferry. Bicyclists and pedestrians would be impacted by the longer travel distance using the bridge rather than walking onto the ferry and riding across Tongass Narrows—pedestrians would be affected more than bicyclists because of the longer travel time. This alternative would substantially improve access to Xxxxxxx Island because a 24-hour bridge access will be more convenient that a ferry.
Sample 1
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. Travel patterns and user convenience would be significantly changed by this alternative. People coming from north of the bridge takeoff on Revillagigedo Island would have to travel much farther south to access the bridge than to access the existing ferry service. For pedestrians and bicyclists who live north of town (i.e., Xxxx Cove), the increased travel times to the new bridge would make it more difficult for them to access the recreational areas on Xxxxxxx Island. Xxxxxxx Island residents, whose only current access to Gravina and Revillagigedo islands is by private skiff, would benefit significantly because they could bicycle or walk over the new bridges to the other islands. This alternative would improve access to both Xxxxxxx Island and Xxxxxxx Island for motorists, but would most likely negatively impact pedestrians and bicyclists because of the location of the alternative—pedestrians would be affected more than bicyclists because of the longer travel time.
Sample 1
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. Travel patterns would be changed by the location of this alternative. People coming from south of the existing ferry terminal would have to travel much farther north to access the new ferry terminal; however, the current ferry will still be in operation and available for use. For residents living north of town, the new ferry terminal would be closer than the existing ferry and access to Xxxxxxx Island would be more convenient. For most pedestrians and bicyclists, access to the recreational land on Xxxxxxx Island would be similar to current access. For pedestrians and bicyclists who live south of town, however, the longer travel times would make this alternative more difficult—with pedestrians being more negatively affected than bicyclists. Because of the roadway loop on Xxxxxxx Island to approach the airport terminal with this alternative, airport users would probably continue to use the existing ferry service, and the new ferry route would be used to access the developable land. This alternative would improve access to Xxxxxxx Island because the schedule would complement the existing ferry service—a ferry would be available more frequently from one ferry terminal or the other.
Sample 1
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. Travel patterns would change for many users because of the location of this alternative, especially for those who live between the current ferry terminal and the proposed terminal to the south. People coming from the north would have to travel farther south to access the new ferry terminal, but downtown residents would be closer. For residents living south of town, this ferry would be closer than the existing ferry for access to Xxxxxxx Island and the airport. Access to recreational land available on Xxxxxxx Island would be similar to what is available now. The longer travel times would make the trip more difficult for pedestrians and bicyclists who live north of town, but travel times would be shorter for those who live south of the current ferry system—pedestrians would be more negatively affected than bicyclists. This alternative would improve access to Xxxxxxx Island because the schedule would complement the existing ferry service—a ferry would be available more frequently from one terminal or the other.
Sample 1
Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility. Travel patterns would not change at all because this alternative proposes two new ferry terminals adjacent to the existing airport ferry terminals. Pedestrians and bicyclists would not be impacted by the location of the alternative, and the mode of travel across the Tongass Narrows would not change. Access to recreational land available on Xxxxxxx Island would be similar to what is available now. Access to Xxxxxxx Island would be more convenient for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists because the ferry schedules would be coordinated to complement each other—a ferry would therefore be available more frequently throughout the day from one terminal or the other.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Changes in Travel Patterns and Accessibility

  • Inclusion and accessibility The institution will provide support to incoming mobile participants with fewer opportunities, according to the requirements of the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education. Information and assistance can be provided by the following contact points and information sources: Although a brief overview is provided in this agreement, more detailed information is sent to the nominees in order for them to prepare their exchange.

  • Accessibility Supplier warrants that all Products will meet the requirements set forth in all federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules, and regulations applicable to accessibility of information technology for people with disabilities. Supplier agrees to use personnel trained and knowledgeable in supporting the needs of persons with disabilities in performance of Services under this Order.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Changes in Equipment, Systems, Etc USBFS reserves the right to make changes from time to time, as it deems advisable, relating to its systems, programs, rules, operating schedules and equipment, so long as such changes do not adversely affect the services provided to the Trust under this Agreement.

  • Changes in Locations, Name, etc The Borrower shall not (i) change the location of its chief executive office/chief place of business from that specified in Section 6 hereof or (ii) change its name, identity or corporate structure (or the equivalent) or change the location where it maintains its records with respect to the Collateral unless it shall have given the Lender at least 30 days prior written notice thereof and shall have delivered to the Lender all Uniform Commercial Code financing statements and amendments thereto as the Lender shall request and taken all other actions deemed necessary by the Lender to continue its perfected status in the Collateral with the same or better priority.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Additional Acceptable Uses of Student Data Contractor is prohibited from using Student Data for any secondary use not described in this agreement except: a. for adaptive learning or customized student learning purposes; b. to market an educational application or product to a parent or legal guardian of a student if Contractor did not use Data, shared by or collected per this Contract, to market the educational application or product; c. to use a recommendation engine to recommend to a student i. content that relates to learning or employment, within the third-party contractor's internal application, if the recommendation is not motivated by payment or other consideration from another party; or

  • Accessibility Requirements Under Tex. Gov’t Code Chapter 2054, Subchapter M, and implementing rules of the Texas Department of Information Resources, the System Agency must procure Products and services that comply with the Accessibility Standards when those Products are available in the commercial marketplace or when those Products are developed in response to a procurement solicitation. Accordingly, Grantee must provide electronic and information resources and associated Product documentation and technical support that comply with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Changes in Name, etc Such Grantor will not, except upon 15 days’ prior written notice to the Administrative Agent and delivery to the Administrative Agent of all additional executed financing statements and other documents reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent to maintain the validity, perfection and priority of the security interests provided for herein, (i) change its jurisdiction of organization or the location of its chief executive office or sole place of business or principal residence from that referred to in Section 4.3 or (ii) change its name.

  • Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility and Security Standards a. Applicability: The following Electronic and Information Resources (“EIR”) requirements apply to the Contract because the Grantee performs services that include EIR that the System Agency's employees are required or permitted to access or members of the public are required or permitted to access. This Section does not apply to incidental uses of EIR in the performance of the Agreement, unless the Parties agree that the EIR will become property of the State of Texas or will be used by HHSC’s clients or recipients after completion of the Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to prescribe the use of particular designs or technologies or to prevent the use of alternative technologies, provided they result in substantially equivalent or greater access to and use of a Product.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!