Company Hiring Decisions Sample Clauses

Company Hiring Decisions. Subject to Section 24.0, the Company may at all times choose its employees and shall be free to employ such persons who are not citizens of the State as are required for the efficient conduct of the Project, as long as it complies with the ration of foreign to national employees of 1:9 according to the Labor Law. Where Applicable Law stipulates minimum technical qualifications or minimum levels of competence for any technical post, EMRA undertakes to recognize equivalent technical qualifications or certificates of competency held by persons who are not citizens of the State, provided that such qualifications and/ or certificates of competency shall have been issued by a recognized institution or statutory authority in any other country employing standards comparable to those in Applicable Law. The Company shall also conduct a program to acquaint all expatriate employees and contractors with Applicable Law and customs of the State.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Company Hiring Decisions. Subject to Section 24.0, the Company may at all times choose its employees and shall be free to employ such persons who are not citizens of the State as are required for the efficient conduct of the Project, as long as it complies with the ration of foreign to national employees of 1:9 according to the Labor Law. Where Applicable Law stipulates minimum technical qualifications or minimum levels of competence for any technical post, EMRA undertakes to recognize equivalent technical qualifications or certificates of competency held by persons who are not citizens of the State, provided that such qualifications and/ or certificates of competency shall have been issued by a recognized institution or statutory authority in any other country employing standards comparable to those in Applicable Law. The Company shall also conduct a program to acquaint all expatriate employees and contractors with Applicable Law and customs of the State. For the duration of the implementation of this Exploration License and in the event of a change or a replacement of a key personnel, whether foreign or local, the Company shall nominate for such change or replacement a person of at least at the same qualification of the person who is changed or replaced, provided that EMRA's prior written approval is obtained for the nominated person.
Sample 1
Company Hiring Decisions. Comments indicated that this is a controversial and political topic. Comments noted that disparity in the wages of expatriate hires and local hires leads to conflict and may result in violence. Some comments called for the company to focus its efforts on local hires while others call for the article to give the company flexibility in hiring decisions. Comments called for this article to promote partnerships between the company and the host government to meet hiring targets. Other comments suggested that this article is too specific for a model agreement; that this article must be negotiated according to the particular circumstances of a given agreement.
Sample 1
Company Hiring Decisions. Subject to Section 24.0, the Company may at all times choose its employees and shall be free to employ such persons who are not citizens of the State as are required for the efficient conduct of the Project, as long as it complies with the ration of foreign to national employees of 1:9 according to the Labor Law. Where Applicable Law stipulates minimum technical qualifications or minimum levels of competence for any technical post, undertakes to recognize equivalent technical qualifications or certificates of competency held by persons who are not citizens of the State, provided that such qualifications and/ or certificates of competency shall have been issued by a recognized institution or statutory authority in any other country employing standards comparable to those in Applicable Law. The Company shall also conduct a program to acquaint all expatriate employees and contractors with Applicable Law and customs of the State.
Sample 1
Company Hiring Decisions. Subject to Section 24.0, the Company may at all times choose its employees and shall be free to employ such persons who are not citizens of the State as are required for the efficient conduct of the Project. Where Applicable Law stipulates minimum technical qualifications or minimum levels of competence for any technical post, the State undertakes to recognize equivalent technical qualifications or certificates of competency held by persons who are not citizens of the State, provided that such qualifications and/ or certificates of competency shall have been issued by a recognized institution or statutory authority in any other country employing standards comparable to those in Applicable Law. The Company shall also conduct a program to acquaint all expatriate employees and contractors with Applicable Law and customs of the State.
Sample 1

Related to Company Hiring Decisions

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the Recipient will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Recipient’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Corrective Action Plans If the OAG finds deficiencies in XXXXXXX’s performance under this Grant Contract, the OAG, at its sole discretion, may impose one or more of the following remedies as part of a corrective action plan: increase of monitoring visits; require additional or more detailed financial and/or programmatic reports be submitted; require prior approval for expenditures; require additional technical or management assistance and/or make modifications in business practices; reduce the contract amount; and/or terminate this Grant Contract. The foregoing are not exclusive remedies, and the OAG may impose other requirements that the OAG determines will be in the best interest of the State.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.