Comparative Criteria Sample Clauses

Comparative Criteria. All proposals must have a section labeled COMPARATIVE CRITERIA and must provide all necessary documentation as evidence that they meet each of the following criteria. If you have placed your documentation elsewhere in this technical proposal, you shall indicate the page number where that documentation can be found. If documentation or identification of page number is not clearly evident for each criterion the proposal may be deemed unresponsive. The evaluation of the Technical Proposals will be based on the “comparative criteria” described in this section. In accordance with applicable Massachusetts law, the following scale will be used to rate each evaluation criterion, as well as to determine a composite rating for each proposal:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparative Criteria. All Proposers meeting the minimum criteria will be evaluated on the basis of the following comparative criteria .The City reserves the right to consider any one or all of the following criteria: Each responsive proposal will be assigned a composite rating using the categories listed in this section. A composite rating of 1 – 4 (1-being low and 4-being high) may be assigned to each item listed below.
Sample 1
Comparative Criteria 
Sample 1

Related to Comparative Criteria

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Goals & Objectives The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure that the proper elements and commitments are in place to provide consistent IT service support and delivery to the Customer by Centre. The goal of this Agreement is to obtain mutual agreement for IT service provision between Centre and Customer. The objectives of this Agreement are to:  Provide clear reference to service ownership, accountability, roles and/or responsibilities.  Present a clear, concise and measurable description of service provision to the Customer.  Match perceptions of expected service provision with actual service support & delivery.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.