COMPARISON RESULTS. Appendix “A” displays the female predominant job classes grouped into levels according to job evaluation results. The chart also shows the male predominant job classes that have been evaluated as being of equal or comparable value (called “male comparators”) and which have been used to determine the pay equity gaps. The difference in compensation for each female predominant job where a pay equity gap was identified, was calculated using the 1989 job rates.
COMPARISON RESULTS. Bringing together the four different models, the two wind sources, and the modelling procedure (Sec. 10.3), model predictions were obtained for 2004 days (consisting of the winter-half of 11 years) and for each of the 439 administrative districts. Due to the high level of detail, the presentation of results is focused on 3 distinct aggregation levels: i) daily loss per district, ii) daily countrywide losses, and iii) countrywide losses caused by the six most severe storm events during their entire passage duration. In case of models K and H, different setups for model calibration were possible (cf. Ap- pendix B). For greater clarity, only those results that relate to the best-performing setup are reported, while additional information is given in the Electronic Supplementary Material. The circumstances of comparing two deterministic and two probabilistic models require the choice of a common metric. The output of the deterministic models is hence considered equivalent to an expected value obtained from the probabilistic models and forms the basis of the model intercomparison.
COMPARISON RESULTS. The pilot laboratory will collect the results of the participant laboratories. The two outcome results to be reported are:
