Common use of Completion of Evaluation Cycle Clause in Contracts

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. The evaluator shall note evidence used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Value Added Measures or Scores and the current school year for all other student growth measures, scores and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 10, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10superintendent. f. Once every three (3) years for accomplished and once every two years for skilled the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This . The biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issuewith minimal required information. h. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. i. The district shall submit the final summative rating of teacher effectiveness to the Ohio Department of Education by May 10.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school year. The first year (2014-2015) of collected data for the evaluation procedure shall be solely derived from the teacher performance evaluation. Beginning the second year (2015-2016) and every year thereafter, the evaluation shall be a combination of the SGM from the previous year and the teacher performance evaluation from the current year. Under these provisions, every teacher shall go through a teacher performance evaluation cycle during the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 school years. An evaluation cycle shall not be completed until all teachers have been provided with a written report of the results of the evaluation. b. 2. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 3. The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 4. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. 5. The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 10, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10superintendent. f. Once 6. Beginning the 2016-2017 school year, once every three (3) two years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. 7. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education including only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from following information: the eTPES choice options number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted as well as the number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issueIneffective) aggregated by teacher preparation programs and the years in which the teachers graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by district. h. 8. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. i. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school year. This process will be reviewed upon implementation of state- sanctioned standardized testing. b. ii. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if anyareas of refinement. c. iii. The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal summative evaluation report. d. iv. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. v. The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 15, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10Superintendent. f. vi. Once every three two (32) years the board credentialed evaluator shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This Article. The biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May (May 1) of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May (May 10) of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. vii. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education including only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from following information: the eTPES choice options number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted as well as the number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or requires another means Ineffective) aggregated by teacher preparation programs and the years in which the teachers graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained as set forth in the provisions of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issueAgreement. h. viii. A teacher shall be given by the district District one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. ix. The District shall submit the final summative rating of teacher effectiveness to the Ohio Department of Education by May 15.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. i. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the formal observations and walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. ii. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if anyareas of refinement. c. iii. The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. iv. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures (e.g. a “PIN”) may be used. e. v. The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 10, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10Superintendent. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each vi. Any teacher assigned who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplishedskilled” shall be placed on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articleLess Frequent Evaluation cycle the school year following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “averageteacher is not making progress on the professional growth plan.” This vii. Any teacher who receives an evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilledaccomplished” shall be evaluated every other yearplaced on the Less Frequent Evaluation cycle the two (2) school years following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In teacher is not making progress on the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. viii. A teacher shall be given by the district District one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. ix. The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the ODE including only the following information: a. The number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted; b. The number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective) aggregated by the institution where they received their teaching degree and the year in which they graduated All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by the district. x. Upon request, teachers shall be given copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. a) The summative evaluation of a teacher rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during aligned to the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school yearOhio Educator Standards. b. b) The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. c) The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. d) The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures (e.g. a ‘PIN’) may be used. e. e) The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Superintendent no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3f) years Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Skilled” shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the board shall evaluate each second school year following the rating unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the teacher assigned is not making progress on their professional growth plan. Teachers in the final year of a contract must go through the evaluation cycle. g) Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlethird school year following the rating, provided unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by teacher is not making progress on their professional growth plan. Teachers in the first day final year of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of contract must go through the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedulecycle. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Ratingh) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department ODE including only the following information: (1) the number of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted; (2) the ODE remove Option 3 from number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective) aggregated by the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, institution where they will meet to negotiate this issuereceived their teaching degree and the year in which they graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by the District. h. A teacher i) Upon request, teachers shall be given by the district one (1) copy copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. I. DUE PROCESS 1. Teachers who disagree with and provide evidence that identifies errors with, data sources, data collection or calculation, performance ratings, and/or the summative evaluation rating shall be permitted to request a different credentialed evaluator. Such requests shall be documented and may be approved by the District. 2. A teacher shall be entitled to Association representation at any conference held during this procedure.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher unit member evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. . The evaluator shall note evidence all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation written report. d. . The evaluation written report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report unit member. The unit member's signature shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher serve as acknowledgement that the evaluation shall written report will be placed on in the unit member’s personnel file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. b. The Superintendent/designee may waive the annual evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned for a unit member receiving an evaluation effectiveness rating of “Accomplished” on the teacher’s unit member's most recent evaluation conducted under pursuant to this article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every three years instead of annually as long as the teacher is making progress on his/her Professional Growth Plan. This will apply to school counselors who are rated Accomplished so long as the metric of student outcomes, provided that for the SGM component remains at least “average.” This most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation shall be rubric. Triennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this article are completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. c. The Superintendent/designee may waive the tenth day annual evaluation for a unit member receiving an effectiveness rating of May of that school year. Teachers whose "Skilled" on the unit member's most recent evaluation were assigned conducted pursuant to this Article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every two years instead of annually as long as the teacher is making progress on his/her Professional Growth Plan. This also applies to school counselors who are rated Skilled so long as the metric of student outcomes, for the most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation rubric. Biennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this Article are completed by May 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. d. In any year that a unit member is not fully evaluated pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this Section as a result of receiving a rating of “Skilled” Accomplished or Skilled on the unit member's most recent evaluation, an individual qualified to evaluate a unit member shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains conduct at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised formal observation of the use unit member of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by at least thirty (30) minutes and hold a post-observation conference with the unit member utilizing the observation form in Appendix D. e. The Board may elect not to conduct an evaluation of observation time a unit member who was on leave from the school district for fifty percent (50%) or more of the school year, as calculated by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating Board or a unit member who has submitted notice of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree retirement and that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher shall be given notice has been accepted by the district one (1) copy Board not later than the first day of all information and documents obtained through December of the school year in which the evaluation processis otherwise scheduled to be conducted.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher unit member evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. . The evaluator shall note evidence all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation written report. d. . The evaluation written report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report unit member. The unit member's signature shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher serve as acknowledgement that the evaluation shall written report will be placed on in the unit member’s personnel file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. b. The Superintendent/designee may waive the annual evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned for a unit member receiving an evaluation effectiveness rating of “Accomplished” on the teacher’s unit member's most recent evaluation conducted under pursuant to this article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every three years instead of annually as long as the teacher's student academic growth measure for the most recent school year for which data is available, is average or higher, as determined by the Department of Education. This will apply to school counselors who are rated Accomplished so long as the metric of student outcomes, for the most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation rubric. Triennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this article are completed by May 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. c. The Superintendent/designee may waive the annual evaluation for a unit member receiving an effectiveness rating of "Skilled" on the unit member's most recent evaluation conducted pursuant to this Article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every two years instead of annually as long as the teacher's student academic growth measure for the most recent school year for which data is available, is average or higher, as determined by the Department of Education. This will apply to school counselors who are rated Skilled so long as the metric of student outcomes, for the most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation rubric. Biennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this Article are completed by May 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. d. In any year that a unit member is not formally evaluated pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this Section as a result of receiving a rating of Accomplished or Skilled on the SGM component remains unit member's most recent evaluation, an individual qualified to evaluate a unit member shall conduct at least “average.” This one formal observation of the unit member and hold at least one conference with the unit member utilizing the observation form in Appendix D. e. The Board may elect not to conduct an evaluation shall be completed of a unit member who was on leave from the school district for fifty percent (50%) or more of the school year, as calculated by the Board or a unit member who has submitted notice of retirement and that notice has been accepted by the Board not later than the first day of May December of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of year in which the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall is otherwise scheduled to be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “averageconducted.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures (e.g. a ‘PIN’) may be used. e. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Superintendent no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3) years Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Skilled” shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the board shall evaluate each second school year following the rating unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the teacher assigned is not making progress on their professional growth plan. g. Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlethird school year following the rating, provided unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – h. The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department ODE including only the following information: 1) the number of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted; 2) the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher shall be given Ineffective) aggregated by the district one (1) copy of all information institution where they received their teaching degree and documents obtained through the evaluation process.year in which they graduated;

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Value Added Measures or Scores and the current school year for all other student growth measures, scores and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 10, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10superintendent. f. Once every three (3) two years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This . The biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education including only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from following information: the eTPES choice options number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted as well as the number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Proficient, Developing or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issueIneffective) aggregated by teacher preparation programs and the years in which the teachers graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by district. h. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. i. The district shall submit the final summative rating of teacher effectiveness to the Ohio Department of Education by May 10.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher Final Holistic Summative Evaluation rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through evidence aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Evidence gathered during the walkthroughs walkthroughs, observations and formal observations, including information in direct interactions between the OTES rubric evaluator and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. 2. A teacher may provide evidence to the evaluator to support and inform an accurate reflection of the Evaluation Factors being evaluated. Examples include, but are not limited to, student information affecting educational process, student interest or learning style surveys, newsletters, classroom rules, lesson plans, portfolios, summative assessments, professional education organization work, education awards, and student work samples. All evidence presented will be considered in the evaluator’s assessment of the teacher. 3. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 4. The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 5. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's ’s signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures may be used. e. 6. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Director of Human Resources no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3) years 7. Any teacher who received an evaluation rating of “Skilled” may not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the board shall evaluate each second school year following the rating unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the teacher assigned is not making progress on their professional growth plan. 8. Any teacher who received an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on may not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlethird school year following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting9. Upon request, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher teachers shall be given by the district one (1) copy copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. 10. In any year that a teacher is not formally evaluated, an evaluator shall conduct at least one (1) formal observation of the teacher and hold at least one (1) conference with the teacher. 11. Teachers rated “Accomplished” or “Skilled” may voluntarily choose to be evaluated before the excused window expires.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1) The summative evaluation of a teacher cycle rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance a holistic manner that is assessed through aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. 2) The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 3) The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 4) The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's ’s signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signature (e.g. a ‘PIN’) may be used. e. 5) The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Superintendent no later than May 10. f. Once every three (36) years the board shall evaluate each Any teacher assigned who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplishedskilled” on shall not be subject to a full evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlesecond school year following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “averageteacher is not making progress on their professional growth plan.” This 7) Any teacher who receives an evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilledaccomplished” shall not be evaluated every other yearsubject to a full evaluation cycle until the third school year following the rating, provided unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which teacher is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – 8) The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department ODE including only the following information: i) The number of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issueteachers for whom an evaluation was conducted. h. A teacher shall be given ii) The number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective) aggregated by the district one (1) copy of all information institution where they received their teaching degree and documents obtained through the evaluation processyear in which they graduated.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school year. b. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher unit member evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. . The evaluator shall note evidence all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation written report. d. . The evaluation written report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report unit member. The unit member's signature shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher serve as acknowledgement that the evaluation shall written report will be placed on in the unit member's personnel file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. b. The Superintendent/designee may waive the annual evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned for a unit member receiving an evaluation effectiveness rating of “Accomplished” on the teacher’s unit member's most recent evaluation conducted under pursuant to this article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every three years instead of annually as long as the teacher is making progress on his/her Professional Growth Plan. This will apply to school counselors who are rated Accomplished so long as the metric of student outcomes, for the most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation rubric. Triennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this article are completed by May 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. c. The Superintendent/designee may waive the annual evaluation for a unit member receiving an effectiveness rating of "Skilled" on the unit member's most recent evaluation conducted pursuant to this Article. Such unit members may be evaluated once every two years instead of annually as long as the teacher is making progress on his/her Professional Growth Plan. This also applies to school counselors who so long as the metric of student outcomes, for the most recent school year for which data is available, is Skilled or higher on the evaluation rubric. Biennial evaluations conducted pursuant to this Article are completed by May 1 of the evaluation year and unit members are provided a written copy of their evaluation results by May 10. d. In any year that a unit member is not formally evaluated pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this Section as a result of receiving a rating of Accomplished or Skilled on the SGM component remains unit member's most recent evaluation, an individual qualified to evaluate a unit member shall conduct at least “average.” This one formal observation of the unit member and hold at least one conference with the unit member utilizing the observation form in Appendix D. e. The Board may elect not to conduct an evaluation shall be completed of a unit member who was on leave from the school district for fifty percent (50%) or more of the school year, as calculated by the Board or a unit member who has submitted notice of retirement and that notice has been accepted by the Board not later than the first day of May December of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of year in which the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall is otherwise scheduled to be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “averageconducted.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. 2. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 3. The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 4. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures (e.g. a ‘PIN’) may be used. e. 5. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Superintendent no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3) years 6. Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Skilled” shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the board shall evaluate each second school year following the rating unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the teacher assigned is not making progress on their professional growth plan. 7. Any teacher who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlethird school year following the rating, provided unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – 8. The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department ODE including only the following information: a. the number of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted; b. the ODE remove Option 3 from number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective) aggregated by the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, institution where they will meet to negotiate this issuereceived their teaching degree and the year in which they graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by the District. h. A teacher 9. Upon request, teachers shall be given by the district one (1) copy copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measures, and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school year. b. . • The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidenceevidence gathered, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. . • The evaluator shall note evidence of all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. . • The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall will be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. e. . • The evaluation report shall be completedcompleted by May 10th, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by May 10. f. superintendent. • Once every three (3) two years the board shall evaluate each teacher assigned an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this article, article provided the teacher completes a project that has been approved by the SGM component remains board to demonstrate the teacher’s continued growth and practice at least “average.” This the accomplished level. The biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation schedule. g. • Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education including only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from following information: the eTPES choice options number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted as well as the number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or requires another means of reporting, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. Ineffective) aggregated by teacher preparation programs and the years in which the teachers graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by district. • A teacher shall be given by the district one (1) copy of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. • The District shall submit the final summative rating of teacher effectiveness to the Ohio Department of Education by May 30th.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, including information in the OTES rubric and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, observations that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. 2. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 3. The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 4. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Electronic signatures (e.g. a ‘PIN’) may be used. e. 5. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Superintendent no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3) years the board shall evaluate each 6. Any teacher assigned who receives an evaluation rating of “Accomplishedskilled” on shall not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlesecond school year following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “averageteacher is not making progress on their professional growth plan.” This 7. Any teacher who receives an evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilledaccomplished” shall not be evaluated every other yearsubject to another evaluation cycle until the third school year following the rating, provided unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which teacher is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – 8. The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department ODE including only the following information: a. the number of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted; b. the ODE remove Option 3 from number of teachers assigned each rating (Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective) aggregated by the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting, institution where they will meet to negotiate this issuereceived their teaching degree and the year in which they graduated. All other information and documents obtained through the evaluation process shall be stored and maintained by the District. h. A teacher 9. Upon request, teachers shall be given by the district one (1) copy copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process.

Completion of Evaluation Cycle. a. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher Final Holistic Summative Evaluation rating shall be based upon student growth measures resulting from assessments that were administered a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in the previous school year for Value-Added Measures or the current school year for all other student growth measuresa holistic manner, and performance that is assessed through evidence aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Evidence gathered during the walkthroughs walkthroughs, observations and formal observations, including information in direct interactions between the OTES rubric evaluator and which has been previously discussed with the teacher in a timely fashion, related to professional responsibilities, that are conducted for the current school yearyear may be used. b. 2. A teacher may provide evidence to the evaluator to support and inform an accurate reflection of the Evaluation Factors being evaluated. Examples include, but are not limited to, student information affecting educational process, student interest or learning style surveys, newsletters, classroom rules, lesson plans, portfolios, summative assessments, professional education organization work, education awards, and student work samples. All evidence presented will be considered in the evaluator’s assessment of the teacher. 3. The evaluation shall acknowledge, through the gathered evidence, the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. c. 4. The evaluator shall note evidence of all information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. d. 5. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator; evaluator and the evaluation report shall be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation shall be placed on file. The teacher's ’s signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report.the e. 6. The evaluation report shall be completed, signed by both parties, and filed with the superintendent by Director of Human Resources no later than May 10. f. Once every three (3) years 7. Any teacher who received an evaluation rating of “Skilled” may not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the board shall evaluate each second school year following the rating unless it is determined, in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the teacher assigned is not making progress on their professional growth plan. 8. Any teacher who received an evaluation rating of “Accomplished” on may not be subject to another evaluation cycle until the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this articlethird school year following the rating unless it is determined, provided in writing and through a preponderance of the evidence available to the evaluator, that the SGM component remains at least “average.” This evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. Teachers whose most recent evaluation were assigned a rating of “Skilled” shall be evaluated every other year, provided that the SGM component remains at least “average.” In the “off-years” teachers shall receive one (1) observation, which shall be comprised of the use of the walkthrough form (Appendix K-7) which is informed by thirty (30) minutes of observation time by the evaluator. In the event student not making progress on their professional growth measures are not maintained, as described above, the teacher may be returned to the annual evaluation scheduleplan. g. Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness (Effectiveness Rating) – The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education only utilizing eTPES “Option 3.” The parties agree that should the ODE remove Option 3 from the eTPES choice options or requires another means of reporting9. Upon request, they will meet to negotiate this issue. h. A teacher teachers shall be given by the district one (1) copy copies of all information and documents obtained through the evaluation process. 10. In any year that a teacher is not formally evaluated, an evaluator shall conduct at least one (1) formal observation of the teacher and hold at least one (1) conference with the teacher. 11. Teachers rated “Accomplished” or “Skilled” may voluntarily choose to be evaluated before the excused window expires.