Conduct of the verification Sample Clauses

Conduct of the verification. The verification should be conducted in a spirit of partnership and in close collaboration with the relevant departments and offices in the IMF. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the IMF's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings as the object is not to carry out a full- scale audit of the IMF but to verify, by sample-checking, how the European Union funds have been used. In carrying out these checks, the verification team will work as far as possible in close collaboration with the relevant departments and offices in the IMF, which will allow the verification – including visual inspection - by the verification team of original justifying vouchers in accordance with the IMF’s procedures. Highly confidential information such as bank account numbers, social security numbers and names will be redacted. The verification team has access to all relevant original documents, without exception, for verification purposes. Documents will only be photocopied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the IMF considers confidential. In cases where the verification team identifies serious problems of mismanagement, irregularity, weaknesses in the control systems and procedures, it will inform the responsible Director at Commission headquarters, who will in turn request the relevant department or office in the IMF to examine the matter. The verification team will make a draft of its report available to IMF’s Management for comments prior to final issuance. Factual errors identified by IMF during this review shall be addressed by the verification team prior to final issuance. In the event of disagreement between the verification team and the IMF concerning conclusions in the report, the matter shall be escalated to the responsible Director at Commission headquarters and to the responsible department Director in the IMF for resolution.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conduct of the verification. Verifications by the Commission should be conducted in a collaborative manner between the Commission’s representatives and the Organisation’s operational and accounting services. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the Organisation's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings. The objective is not to carry out an audit of the Organisation but to verify, by sample-checking, how the EU funds have been used. In carrying out the verification, the verification team will work as far as possible in close collaboration with the internal and external audit services of the Organisation, which will allow the verification – including visual inspection - by Commission representatives of original or certified true copies justifying vouchers such as invoices, replies to calls for tender, proof of payments, justifying vouchers in the case of sub-contracting, etc. The verification team shall have access to all original documents (which may be in electronic form) or certified true copies, for verification purposes. Documents will only be photocopied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the Organisation considers particularly sensitive. In cases where the verification team identifies serious problems of mismanagement, irregularities, weaknesses in the control systems and procedures, this will be brought immediately to the attention of the Organisation: Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Regional Director‌ International Organization for Migration Regional Office for the EEA, the EU and NATO Address : Xxx Xxxxxxxx 00, X-0000 Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Tel: 00 00 0 000 0000, Fax: 00 00 0 000 0000‌‌ Email: xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx The verification team will make a draft of its report available to the Organisation's Management for comments prior to final issuance.
Sample 1
Conduct of the verification. The verification should be conducted in a spirit of partnership with the Organisation. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the Organisation's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings as the object is not to carry out a full-scale audit of the Organisation but to verify, by sample-checking, how the EU funds in relation to a specific Action have been used. The verification team has access to all original documents, without exception, for verification purposes. Documents will only be copied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the Organisation considers particularly sensitive. In cases where the verification team identifies serious problems of mismanagement, irregularity, weaknesses in the control systems and procedures, or where they consider it necessary to take photocopies of particularly sensitive documents, they will inform the Organisation and will request it to examine the matter. When the parties agree that copies of documents will be sent to the Commission for a verification pursuant to the last sentence of Article 17.3, the parties agree to comply with the principle of “reasonableness” and the request for documents should be related to the Action funded by the EU. In all cases, when it is necessary to take copies, or copies are sent to the Commission for a verification, each such copy of a document provided by the EBRD, shall remain the sole property of, and form part the archives of, the EBRD and shall not be further copied without the prior consent of the EBRD. Subject to such consent being granted, any further copies made by the Commission shall also belong to the EBRD and shall form part of the archives of the EBRD. The documents, copies of which are to be provided, should be identified in a list and accompanied by a letter from the EBRD, countersigned by the Commission, specifying its acceptance of the terms under which the copies of the documents are provided, and specifying that copies are provided without waiving, renouncing or modifying any of the immunities, privileges or exemptions of the EBRD accorded under the Agreement Establishing the European Bank for Reconstru...
Sample 1

Related to Conduct of the verification

  • Conduct of the Study The Parties shall perform the Study set forth in Protocol No. [ ] dated [ ] (“Protocol”) in accordance with this Agreement, the Protocol and all applicable laws and regulations. The Institution shall follow all guidelines and instructions reasonably provided by Sponsor. [If applicable:] The Principal Investigator has, in addition to his/her Principal Investigator responsibilities, been appointed to coordinate certain activities at a national level as National Coordinating Investigator. It is the duty of the National Coordinating Investigator to obtain all approvals for the Study required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements from the relevant Independent Ethics Committee (“IEC”) before commencing the Study. The National Coordinating Investigator shall also, to the extent required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements, notify and obtain the consent of the relevant EC of any amendments to the Protocol. Such approvals shall be forwarded to Sponsor as they are obtained.

  • Conduct of the Business Each of the Company and Parent covenants and agrees that:

  • Conduct of the Hearing The arbitrator shall hold the hearing in Portland, Oregon unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The hearing shall commence within sixty (60) working days of the arbitrator's acceptance of the case, unless both parties agree to an extension of time. If the arbitrator or either party requests that post-hearing briefs be submitted, the arbitrator shall establish a date for the submission of such briefs and the hearing will be deemed to have been closed by such date.

  • Conduct of the Project C.1. The Proposer agrees to do the work set out in the Proposal in accordance with good standards relevant to such undertakings, and shall expend funds received hereunder only in accordance with such Proposal and the requirements of this Agreement.

  • Conduct of the Parties The parties will not engage in behaviour that is, or may reasonably be considered to be intimidating, bullying, or harassing or commit any act or behaviour which is offensive or abusive in connection with this Agreement.

  • Conduct of mediation In consultation with the mediator, the parties will determine a location, timetable and procedure for the mediation or, if the parties cannot agree on these matters within 7 Working Days of the appointment of the mediator these matters will be determined by the mediator.

  • Conduct of Mediation Sessions Mediation hearings will be conducted in an informal manner and discovery will not be allowed. The discussions, statements, writings and admissions will be confidential to the proceedings (pursuant to California Evidence Code sections 1115 through 1128) and will not be used for any other purpose unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. The parties may agree to exchange any information they deem necessary. Both parties shall have a representative attend the mediation who is authorized to settle the dispute, though City's recommendation of settlement may be subject to the approval of the Mayor and City Council. Either party may have attorneys, witnesses or experts present.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • E-Verification If applicable, Contractor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§ 71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Contractor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Contractor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Contractor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Contractor to the following:

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.