Conduct of the verification Sample Clauses

Conduct of the verification. The verification should be conducted in a spirit of partnership and in close collaboration with the relevant departments and offices in the IMF. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the IMF's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings as the object is not to carry out a full- scale audit of the IMF but to verify, by sample-checking, how the European Union funds have been used. In carrying out these checks, the verification team will work as far as possible in close collaboration with the relevant departments and offices in the IMF, which will allow the verification – including visual inspection - by the verification team of original justifying vouchers in accordance with the IMF’s procedures. Highly confidential information such as bank account numbers, social security numbers and names will be redacted. The verification team has access to all relevant original documents, without exception, for verification purposes. Documents will only be photocopied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the IMF considers confidential. In cases where the verification team identifies serious problems of mismanagement, irregularity, weaknesses in the control systems and procedures, it will inform the responsible Director at Commission headquarters, who will in turn request the relevant department or office in the IMF to examine the matter. The verification team will make a draft of its report available to IMF’s Management for comments prior to final issuance. Factual errors identified by IMF during this review shall be addressed by the verification team prior to final issuance. In the event of disagreement between the verification team and the IMF concerning conclusions in the report, the matter shall be escalated to the responsible Director at Commission headquarters and to the responsible department Director in the IMF for resolution.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conduct of the verification. Verifications by the Commission should be conducted in a collaborative manner between the Commission’s representatives and the Organisation’s operational and accounting services. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the Organisation's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings. The objective is not to carry out an audit of the Organisation but to verify, by sample-checking, how the EU funds have been used. In carrying out the verification, the verification team will work as far as possible in close collaboration with the internal and external audit services of the Organisation, which will allow the verification – including visual inspection - by Commission representatives of original or certified true copies justifying vouchers such as invoices, replies to calls for tender, proof of payments, justifying vouchers in the case of sub-contracting, etc. The verification team shall have access to all original documents (which may be in electronic form) or certified true copies, for verification purposes. Documents will only be photocopied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the Organisation considers particularly sensitive. Email: xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx The verification team will make a draft of its report available to the Organisation's Management for comments prior to final issuance.
Sample 1
Conduct of the verification. The verification should be conducted in a spirit of partnership with the Organisation. The verification will be carried out by Commission representatives in a reasonable manner and without creating an undue burden on the Organisation's regular operations. Verifications are based on the concept of "agreed upon procedures". The verification team performs procedures which the Commission has specified and listed in in the terms of reference. The verification team does not provide an audit opinion but a report of factual findings as the object is not to carry out a full-scale audit of the Organisation but to verify, by sample-checking, how the EU funds in relation to a specific Action have been used. The verification team has access to all original documents, without exception, for verification purposes. Documents will only be copied if this is necessary and copies will not be taken of documents which the Organisation considers particularly sensitive. In cases where the verification team identifies serious problems of mismanagement, irregularity, weaknesses in the control systems and procedures, or where they consider it necessary to take photocopies of particularly sensitive documents, they will inform the Organisation and will request it to examine the matter. When the parties agree that copies of documents will be sent to the Commission for a verification pursuant to the last sentence of Article 17.3, the parties agree to comply with the principle of “reasonableness” and the request for documents should be related to the Action funded by the EU. In all cases, when it is necessary to take copies, or copies are sent to the Commission for a verification, each such copy of a document provided by the EBRD, shall remain the sole property of, and form part the archives of, the EBRD and shall not be further copied without the prior consent of the EBRD. Subject to such consent being granted, any further copies made by the Commission shall also belong to the EBRD and shall form part of the archives of the EBRD. The documents, copies of which are to be provided, should be identified in a list and accompanied by a letter from the EBRD, countersigned by the Commission, specifying its acceptance of the terms under which the copies of the documents are provided, and specifying that copies are provided without waiving, renouncing or modifying any of the immunities, privileges or exemptions of the EBRD accorded under the Agreement Establishing the European Bank for Reconstru...
Sample 1

Related to Conduct of the verification

  • Inspection and Verification The Secured Parties and such persons as the Secured Parties may reasonably designate shall have the right to inspect the Collateral, all records related thereto (and to make extracts and copies from such records) and the premises upon which any of the Collateral is located, to discuss the Grantor’s affairs with the officers of the Grantor and its independent accountants and to verify under reasonable procedures the validity, amount, quality, quantity, value, condition and status of, or any other matter relating to, the Collateral, including, in the case of collateral in the possession of any third Person, by contacting any account debtor or third Person possessing such Collateral for the purpose of making such a verification. Out-of-pocket expenses in connection with any inspections by representatives of the Secured Parties shall be (a) the obligations of the Grantor with respect to any inspection after the Secured Parties’ demand payment of the Notes or (b) the obligation of the Secured Parties in any other case.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • E-Verification The Vendor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Vendor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Vendor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Vendor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Vendor to the following: termination of this contract for goods or services and ineligibility for any state or public contract in Mississippi for up to three (3) years with notice of such cancellation/termination being made public; the loss of any license, permit, certification, or other document granted to Vendor by an agency, department or governmental entity for the right to do business in Mississippi for up to one (1) year; or,

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project. 4.8.2 The third party may verify the construction works/operation of the Power Project being carried out by the SPD and if it is found that the construction works/operation of the Power Project is not as per the Prudent Utility Practices, it may seek clarifications from SPD or require the works to be stopped or to comply with the instructions of such third party.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspections The Servicer shall inspect the Mortgaged Property as often as deemed necessary by the Servicer in accordance with Accepted Servicing Practices to assure itself that the value of the Mortgaged Property is being preserved. In addition, if any Mortgage Loan is more than 45 days delinquent, the Servicer promptly shall inspect the Mortgaged Property and shall conduct subsequent inspections in accordance with Accepted Servicing Practices or as may be required by the primary mortgage guaranty insurer. Upon request, the Servicer shall produce an electronic report of each such inspection.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes. 3.8.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted in the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods’ final destination If conducted on the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring entity. 3.8.3 Should any inspected or tested goods fail to conform to the Specifications, the Procuring entity may reject the equipment, and the tenderer shall either replace the rejected equipment or make alterations necessary to make specification requirements free of costs to the Procuring entity. 3.8.4 The Procuring entity’s right to inspect, test and where necessary, reject the goods after the Goods’ arrival shall in no way be limited or waived by reason of the equipment having previously been inspected, tested and passed by the Procuring entity or its representative prior to the equipment delivery. 3.8.5 Nothing in paragraph 3.8 shall in any way release the tenderer from any warranty or other obligations under this Contract.

  • Inspection/Testing In order to assess Supplier’s work quality and/or compliance with this Order, upon reasonable notice by Buyer: (a) all goods, materials and services related to the items purchased hereunder, including, raw materials, components, assemblies, work in process, tools and end products shall be subject to inspection and testing by Buyer, its customer, representative or regulatory authorities at all places, including sites where the goods are made or located or the services are performed, whether at Supplier’s premises or elsewhere; and (b) all of Supplier’s facilities, books and records relating to this Order shall be subject to inspection by Buyer or its designee. If specific Buyer and/or Buyer’s customer tests, inspection and/or witness points are included in this Order, the goods shall not be shipped without an inspector’s release or a written waiver of test/inspection/witness with respect to each such point; however, Buyer shall not be permitted to unreasonably delay shipment; and Supplier shall notify Buyer in writing at least twenty (20) days prior to each of Supplier’s scheduled final and, if applicable, intermediate test/inspection/witness points. Supplier agrees to cooperate with such/audit inspection including, completing and returning questionnaires and making available its knowledgeable representatives. Buyer’s failure to inspect or test goods, materials or services or Buyer’s failure to reject or detect defects by inspection or testing shall not relieve Supplier from its warranty obligations or any of its other obligations or responsibilities under this Order. Supplier agrees to provide small business as well as minority and/or women owned business utilization and demographic data upon request.

  • Testing Landlord shall have the right to conduct annual tests of the Premises to determine whether any contamination of the Premises or the Project has occurred as a result of Tenant’s use. Tenant shall be required to pay the cost of such annual test of the Premises; provided, however, that if Tenant conducts its own tests of the Premises using third party contractors and test procedures acceptable to Landlord which tests are certified to Landlord, Landlord shall accept such tests in lieu of the annual tests to be paid for by Tenant. In addition, at any time, and from time to time, prior to the expiration or earlier termination of the Term, Landlord shall have the right to conduct appropriate tests of the Premises and the Project to determine if contamination has occurred as a result of Tenant’s use of the Premises. In connection with such testing, upon the request of Landlord, Tenant shall deliver to Landlord or its consultant such non-proprietary information concerning the use of Hazardous Materials in or about the Premises by Tenant or any Tenant Party. If contamination has occurred for which Tenant is liable under this Section 30, Tenant shall pay all costs to conduct such tests. If no such contamination is found, Landlord shall pay the costs of such tests (which shall not constitute an Operating Expense). Landlord shall provide Tenant with a copy of all third party, non-confidential reports and tests of the Premises made by or on behalf of Landlord during the Term without representation or warranty and subject to a confidentiality agreement. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly and satisfactorily remediate any environmental conditions identified by such testing in accordance with all Environmental Requirements. Landlord’s receipt of or satisfaction with any environmental assessment in no way waives any rights which Landlord may have against Tenant.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!