Content of Agreements Sample Clauses

Content of Agreements. The Municipality will ensure that agreements with Landowners: (i) provide unrestricted access to the Municipality and the Province (notwithstanding the Province not being party to the agreement) to the lands required for the purposes of the Wetland Replacement Project, for a minimum of 10 years commencing on the effective date of the Landowner agreement (which should align as closely as possible to the projected start date of the Wetland Replacement Project); (ii) address compensation to the Landowner (including amount and payment structure) for access to the Landowner’s lands; (iii) address permissible activities within and immediately surrounding the wetland and timing of those activities; (iv) permit early termination by the Municipality if the related Service Contract is terminated prior to its expiry date; (v) have a minimum 10 year term, commencing on or about the commencement date of the Wetland Replacement Project; and (vi) contain an acknowledgement by the Landowner that: a. any wetlands restored or constructed on the Landowner’s lands as part of the Wetland Replacement Project are protected by the restrictions in the Alberta Water Act and are subject to the Water Act and any other applicable acts, and b. that any future activity that may impact the Wetland Replacement Project will require a wetland assessment and will be subject to the Alberta Wetland Policy.

Content of Agreements. The agreement templates reviewed control disclosures for different data purposes and between different types of parties. Data uses included billing, research, data warehousing/linking and clinical uses; the agreement templates were employed between public, private and foreign bodies. - The agreements and templates ranged widely in complexity and formality. Some address only confidentiality and controls to support it. Some directly state permitted data use while others do not. Some include business objectives and some do not. In one case a “Letter” of Understanding was more than forty pages – much longer than its name implies. Observation # 3: One of the foremost principles of the CSA Model Code and fair information management is the requirement to define the purposes for which the data will be used. However, the data purpose was not always explicitly stated in the agreements reviewed, and doing so is important in order to clarify expectations and apply appropriate controls to the various purposes. - Some agreements make use of statements of general principles while others use contract clauses or consent. - Some agreements hold that once data is disclosed, it is under the legal control responsibility of the recipient while others maintain that the disclosing organization retains control. - Some jurisdictions require a comparable level of data protection available by law in the receiver’s jurisdiction before data is disclosed. - Some agreements prohibit onward disclosure and/or use for other purposes while others do not mention it at all. - Some agreements control outsourced IT services, but others do not. - Some agreements were designed to retain tight control over personal records while others control only the financial aspects of a relationship2. Observation #4: There is little consistency on some very key clauses or issues such as permitted purpose, onward disclosure, and security and confidentiality.