Contesting an Audit Sample Clauses

Contesting an Audit. If the party that did not select the independent auditor does not agree with the findings of the audit, then such party can contest the findings by providing notice of such disagreement to the other party (the "Dispute Notice"). The date of delivery of such notice is the "Dispute Notice Date." If the parties are unable to resolve the disagreement within 10 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date, they will resolve the disagreement in accordance with the following procedures. The two parties and the auditor that conducted the audit will all agree on an independent certified public accountant with a regional or national accounting practice in the wireless telecommunications industry (the "Arbiter") within 15 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date. If, within 15 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date, the three parties fail to agree on the Arbiter, then at the request of either party to this agreement, the Arbiter will be selected pursuant to the rules then in effect of the American Arbitration Association. Each party will submit to the Arbiter within 5 Business Days after its selection and engagement all information reasonably requested by the Arbiter to enable the Arbiter to independently resolve the issue that is the subject of the Dispute Notice. The Arbiter will make its own determination of the amount of fees, costs, expenses or other charges payable under this agreement with respect to the period audited. The Arbiter will issue a written report of its determination in reasonable detail and will deliver a copy of the report to the parties within 10 Business Days after the Arbiter receives all of the information reasonably requested. The determination made by the Arbiter will be final and binding and may be enforced by any court having jurisdiction. The parties will cooperate fully in assisting the Arbiter and will take such actions as are necessary to expedite the completion of and to cause the Arbiter to expedite its assignment. If the amount owed by a contesting party is reduced by more than 10% or the amount owed to a contesting party is increased by more than 10% then the non-contesting party will pay the costs and expenses of the Arbiter, otherwise the contesting party will pay the costs and expenses of the Arbiter.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contesting an Audit. Within fifteen days after notice from Licensee that it contests an audit determination of License Fees under Section 3.5.2, the County Administrator shall schedule an administrative hearing. This shall be a public hearing, and Licensee shall be afforded full due process of law, including, without limitation, an opportunity to be heard, to present evidence, and to cross examine witnesses. Within fifteen days after the conclusion of such hearing, the County shall issue a determination.
Contesting an Audit. Within 15 days after notice from Licensee that it contests an audit determination of License Fees under Subsection 3.5(B), the City Manager shall schedule an administrative hearing in accordance with the procedures set forth in Subsection 4.5-7(g) of the Cable Code. This shall be a public hearing, and Licensee shall be afforded full due process of law, including, without limitation, an opportunity to be heard, to present evidence, and to subpoena and cross examine witnesses. Within 15 days after the conclusion of such hearing, the City Manager or authorized designee shall issue a determination, and his determination shall be final, except to the extent a further hearing is permitted pursuant to Subsection 4.5-7(g) of the Cable Code.
Contesting an Audit. If the party that did not select the independent auditor does not agree with. the findings of the audit, then such party can contest the findings by providing notice of such disagreement to the other party (the "Dispute Notice"). The date of delivery of such notice is the "Dispute Notice Date." If the parties are unable to resolve the disagreement within 10 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date, they will resolve the disagreement in accordance with the following procedures. The two parties and the auditor that conducted the audit will all agree on an independent certified public accountant with a regional or national accounting practice in the wireless telecommunications industry (the "Arbiter") within 15 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date. If, within 15 Business Days after the Dispute Notice Date, the three parties fail to agree on the Arbiter, then at the request of either party to this agreement, the Arbiter will be selected pursuant to the rules then in effect of the American Arbitration Association. Each party will submit to the Arbiter within 5 Business Days after its selection and engagement all information reasonably requested by the Arbiter to enable the Arbiter to independently resolve the issue that is the subject of the Dispute Notice. The Arbiter will make its own determination of the amount of fees,

Related to Contesting an Audit

  • Independent Audit The Grantee shall submit, in a format specified by the department, the independent financial compliance audit prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant for the previous fiscal year. The audit shall follow the General Grant Requirements of Sections VIII (F) and (G) and be submitted no later than March 1 of the current fiscal year.

  • Independent Auditor If: (a) the Provider is the Distributor and, acting reasonably, gives notice that the Records contain information about other industry participants that cannot reasonably be severed from the information relating to the Trader or that the information is commercially sensitive; or (b) the provider is the Trader and, acting reasonably, gives notice that the Records contain information about other industry participants that cannot reasonably be severed from information relating to the Distributor or that the information is commercially sensitive, then the Distributor or the Trader, as appropriate, will permit an independent auditor (the “Auditor”) appointed by the other party to review the Records and the other party will not itself directly review any of the Records. The Distributor or the Trader, as appropriate, will not unreasonably object to the Auditor appointed by the other party. In the event that the Distributor or the Trader, as appropriate, reasonably objects to the identity of the Auditor, the parties will request the President of the New Zealand Law Society (or a nominee) to appoint a person to act as the Auditor. The party that is permitted by this clause 31.5 to appoint an Auditor will pay the Auditor’s costs, unless the Auditor discovers a material inaccuracy in the Records in which case the other party will pay the Auditor’s costs. The terms of appointment of the Auditor will require the Auditor to keep the Records confidential.

  • Audit Notwithstanding any other audit requirement, H-GAC reserves the right to conduct or cause to be conducted an independent audit of any transaction under this Agreement, such audit may be performed by the H-GAC local government audit staff, a certified public accountant firm, or other auditors designated by H-GAC and will be conducted in accordance with applicable professional standards and practices. The Contractor understands and agrees that the Contractor shall be liable to the H-GAC for any findings that result in monetary obligations to H-GAC.

  • Independent Auditors The Company shall, until at least the Termination Date, maintain as its independent auditors an accounting firm authorized to practice before the SEC.

  • Cooperation in Litigation Each party hereto will reasonably cooperate with the other in the defense or prosecution of any litigation or proceeding already instituted or which may be instituted hereafter against or by such party relating to or arising out of the use of the Purchased Assets prior to the Effective Date (other than litigation arising out of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement). The party requesting such cooperation shall pay the out-of-pocket expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) of the party providing such cooperation and of its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents reasonably incurred in connection with providing such cooperation, but shall not be responsible to reimburse the party providing such cooperation for such party's time spent in such cooperation or the salaries or costs of fringe benefits or similar expenses paid by the party providing such cooperation to its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents while assisting in the defense or prosecution of any such litigation or proceeding.

  • Independent Study A sabbatical leave may be granted for a plan of independent study, research, writing, and/or travel equivalent in time and rigor to a sabbatical for formal study. A detailed, specific plan must be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Salary and Leaves Committee as likely to improve the applicant’s teaching effectiveness, strengthen the College’s academic program, or otherwise bring a clear benefit to students. In addition, sabbaticals for independent study must generate tangible products of use to students.

  • Independent Testing Owner shall furnish independent tests, inspections and reports required by law, the Contract Documents or deemed appropriate by the Owner, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazardous materials to be conducted by consultants retained by the Owner.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that Xxxxx has materially breached this IA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!