CONTRACT WRITTEN PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET ACT Sample Clauses

CONTRACT WRITTEN PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET ACT. A. It is mutually understood between the parties that this Agreement may have been written prior to approval of the Budget Act for the mutual benefit of both parties in order to avoid program and fiscal delays. B. This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the Budget Act for the Fiscal Year(s) involved for the purposes of this program. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, or conditions enacted by the Legislature and contained in the Budget Xxxx or any statute enacted by the Legislature which may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this Agreement in any manner. C. It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current year and/or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect. In this event, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to the Contractor or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and the Contractor shall not be obligated to perform any additional provisions of this Agreement. D. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act for purposes of this program, the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the State, or offer an agreement amendment to the Contractor to reflect the reduced amount.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (13)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONTRACT WRITTEN PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET ACT. A. It is mutually understood between the parties that this Agreement may have been written prior to approval of the Budget Act for the mutual benefit of both parties in order to avoid program and fiscal delays.
Sample 1

Related to CONTRACT WRITTEN PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET ACT

  • Necessity for Written Approvals All approvals and decisions of the Regional Water Board under the terms of this Stipulated Order shall be communicated to the Settling Respondent in writing. No oral advice, guidance, suggestions, or comments from Regional Water Board employees or officials regarding submissions or notices shall be construed to relieve the Settling Respondent of its obligation to obtain any final written approval this Stipulated Order requires.

  • ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING This Contract incorporates by reference Article 9 of the Arlington County Purchasing Resolution, as well as all state and federal laws related to ethics, conflicts of interest or bribery, including the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act (Code of Virginia § 2.2-3100 et seq.), the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act (Code of Virginia § 18.2-498.1 et seq.) and Articles 2 and 3 of Chapter 10 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended (§ 18.2-438 et seq.). The Contractor certifies that its proposal was made without collusion or fraud; that it has not offered or received any kickbacks or inducements from any other offeror, supplier, manufacturer or subcontractor; and that it has not conferred on any public employee having official responsibility for this procurement any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything of more than nominal value, present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater value was exchanged.

  • Course Approval Approval for dual credit shall be by the LEA and POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTION representatives on a course-by-course basis each semester based on the student’s prior coursework, career pathway, and/or academic readiness. There is no state limit to the number of credits a student may earn through dual credit in an academic term; however, the student must meet eligibility requirements.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!