CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SESAMO MODEL Sample Clauses

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SESAMO MODEL. BASED PERSPECTIVE FROM CHESS The generic SESAMO approach to joint security and safety modelling presents several challenges to the model-based engineering community:  Safety and security are both non-functional properties. Traditional modelling approaches have been very good at capturing functional properties, but much less attention has been paid to non-functional properties – not just safety and security, but any non-functional properties such as performance and real-time characteristics (which also greatly affect safety and security, as the work in WP2 and WP3 of SESAMO has highlighted).  The building blocks of SESAMO WP2, and to a great extent even the analysis methods of WP3, are intended to be reusable modelling artefacts. But traditional modelling approaches have placed little emphasis on the reusability of parts of models – often the concept of a “component” does not even exist in a modelling approach. There is a single model for the entire system and nothing else. But SESAMO needs the concept of a reusable modelling “component” that can be composed with others not only to form the overall system, but sometimes even the overall set of activities (e.g. different forms of trade-off analysis).  Although the SESAMO generic process is described as a “joint” process, upon close examination it is evident that it involves a sequence of modelling first from different points of view, in which there is a separation of concerns between safety and security aspects, followed by confrontation involving trade-off-analyses – after which the cycle of separated modelling concerns followed by analyses starts anew. Traditional modelling approaches generally provide little or no support for modelling from different points of view – there is a single model, made from a single point of view. (We are not speaking of “vertical” abstraction levels here, which are well-known, but rather “horizontal” slices of the model, which are much less commonly provided.) All of the issues described above must be addressed in order for the model-based perspective of SESAMO to be adequate to accommodate the generic process. The SESAMO solution to these issues is provided through the results of the CHESS (Composition with Guarantees for High- integrity Embedded Software Components Assembly) ARTEMIS JU Call 2008 project, aimed at developing solutions to property-preserving component assembly in real-time and dependable embedded systems [22]. In particular, CHESS promoted the adoption of C...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SESAMO MODEL

  • CONTRIBUTIONS TO COMPANY WEBSITE Xxxxxxx Roofing may provide an area for our user and members to contribute feedback to our website. When you submit ideas, documents, suggestions and/or proposals ("Contributions") to our site, you acknowledge and agree that:

  • User Contributions The Website may contain message boards, chat rooms, personal web pages or profiles, forums, bulletin boards, and other interactive features (collectively, "Interactive Services") that allow users to post, submit, publish, display, or transmit to other users or other persons (hereinafter, "post") content or materials (collectively, "User Contributions") on or through the Website. All User Contributions must comply with these Terms of Use. Any User Contribution you post to the site will be considered non-confidential and non- proprietary. By providing any User Contribution on the Website, you grant us and our affiliates and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors, and assigns the right to use, reproduce, modify, perform, display, distribute, and otherwise disclose to third parties any such material. You represent and warrant that: • You own or control all rights in and to the User Contributions and have the right to grant the license granted above to us and our affiliates and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors, and assigns. • All of your User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use. You understand and acknowledge that you are responsible for any User Contributions you submit or contribute, and you, not the Company, have full responsibility for such content, including its legality, reliability, accuracy, and appropriateness. We are not responsible or liable to any third party for the content or accuracy of any User Contributions posted by you or any other user of the Website.

  • Contributions for OTPP Plan Members i. When an employee/plan member is on short term sick leave and receiving less than 100% of regular salary, the Board will continue to deduct and remit OTPP contributions based on 100% of the employee/plan member’s regular pay.

  • Premium Contributions i. Effective March 1, 2014, the Company and employees will contribute toward the premium costs of the NECA Health Plan for eligible Regular employees in accordance with this Section.

  • Catch-Up Contributions In the case of a Traditional IRA Owner who is age 50 or older by the close of the taxable year, the annual cash contribution limit is increased by $1,000 for any taxable year beginning in 2006 and years thereafter.

  • When Can I Make Contributions You may make annual contributions to your Xxxx XXX any time up to and including the due date for filing your tax return for the year, not including extensions. You may continue to make regular contributions to your Xxxx XXX even after you attain RMD age. In addition, rollover contributions and transfers (to the extent permitted as discussed below) may be made at any time, regardless of your age.

  • Initial Contributions The Members initially shall contribute to the Company capital as described in Schedule 2 attached to this Agreement.

  • Contributions to Individual Account Programs As of the date that an employee becomes a member of the Individual Account Program established by Section 29 of Chapter 733, Oregon Laws 2003 and pursuant to Section 3 of that same chapter, the State will pay an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the employee’s monthly salary, not to be deducted from the salary, as the employee’s contribution to the employee’s account in that program. The employee’s contributions paid by the State under this Section 2 shall not be considered to be “salary” for the purposes of determining the amount of employee contributions required to be contributed pursuant to Section 32 of Chapter 733, Oregon Laws 2003.

  • In-Kind Contributions For clarity, In-Kind contributions will only be recognized as eligible when the costs incurred by the Applicant are incidental to its ordinary course of business, directly attributable to the Project and easily auditable.

  • Distribution of Financial Contribution The financial contribution of the Funding Authority to the Project shall be distributed by the Coordinator according to: - the Consortium Plan - the approval of reports by the Funding Authority, and - the provisions of payment in Section 7.3. A Party shall be funded only for its tasks carried out in accordance with the Consortium Plan.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.