Design of Experiments Electrolyte Evaluation Plan Sample Clauses

Design of Experiments Electrolyte Evaluation Plan. The goal of this subtask is to perform an extensive Design of Experiments (DOE) to deliver a high- fidelity, high-volume dataset that maximizes the accuracy and efficiency of the data-driven electrolyte downselection process. The first screen will involve up to 100 electrolyte formulations for initial model training with subsequent screens anticipated to consist of 50‒100 formulations resulting in > 250 unique electrolyte formulations being screened during this project. The Recipient shall: • Evaluate the variables listed below for the DOE process. Those identified as providing the greatest return on investment (ROI) will be included in the electrolyte screen. ROI will be determined by weighting existing knowledge about electrolyte properties and impact on cell performance, ease of measurement, and anticipated quality of collected data. o Electrolyte formulation – solvents, salts, additives, and ratios with a fixed cost threshold. Targeting over 250 unique formulations over the course of this project. o Measured or computed electrolyte properties – conductivity, density, freeing point, viscosity, flash point, voltage stability, and water concentration o Membrane identity – Recipient will test between one and three of their leading XXXX membrane designs o Cell format – full Li|NMC cells, symmetric Li|Li cells, asymmetric Li|Cu cells o Data replication – number of cells per formulation and control cells o Formation conditions – temperature, rest time, rest voltage, charge/discharge current density o Cell cycling conditions and data collection – coulombic efficiency, impedance, area specific resistance, cycle life to 80% capacity, and rate performance o Post-mortem analysis – visual inspection of lithium metal anode, surface characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy of lithium metal anodes with image analysis such as ImageJ • Create a DOE Electrolyte Test Plan that includes a detailed assessment of each variable listed above, the potential impact on the electrolyte screen, anticipated ROI, key risks, risk mitigation plan, a list of the electrolyte formulations to be tested, and an action plan to execute the data-driven electrolyte optimization. Products: • DOE Electrolyte Test Plan
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Design of Experiments Electrolyte Evaluation Plan

  • Job Evaluation Plan It is agreed that there shall be a Job Evaluation Plan the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement. It is understood that the Job Evaluation Plan shall not be subject to the grievance procedure as set forth in Article XXXI, Adjustment of Complaints. Any dispute which may arise thereunder shall be dealt with as provided in the Job Evaluation Plan.

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!