Evaluation Plan. The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.
Evaluation Plan. At a pre-evaluation conference held in compliance with the timelines established in Section 14.6.1., the evaluatee(s) and the evaluator shall meet, discuss and mutually agree upon the evaluation plan, including constraints. Evaluatees and evaluators are encouraged to be creative and take risks when developing options. The evaluatee(s) and the evaluator will schedule evaluation updates throughout the assessment period. The agreed-upon evaluation plan may transcend the traditional school year cycle and the final evaluation conference may be extended by mutual agreement.
Evaluation Plan. D15.1 A Joint Evaluation Committee shall be established to review internal equity for those positions covered by this Agreement and shall consist of three (3) members from the Union and from the Corporation. The Administrator's designate shall also be a member of the Committee and act in the capacity of Chairperson.
Evaluation Plan. Based upon the decisions reached at the unit member’s meeting with the primary evaluator, the unit member will submit to the primary evaluator a written alternative evaluation plan. The unit member’s written alternative evaluation plan shall include timelines for the plan’s completion. The Mutual Agreement For Participating In the Alternative Evaluation form is attached as Appendix J-7 and incorporated into this section.
Evaluation Plan. The Board agrees that if during the term of this Agreement it seeks to amend those parts of the Evaluation Plan not included in Appendix B heretofore submitted to the State Board of Education pursuant to law, such proposed amendment shall be first discussed with a committee of teachers to be appointed by the Association President or designee. That portion of the Evaluation Plan which is reproduced as Appendix B is deemed part of this Agreement and subject to Article XlII, "Grievance Procedure".
Evaluation Plan g. To participate in individual teacher/principal supervisory consultations which may result from direct supervisory observations of the teacher by his or her principal and/or any other work related matter. The principal shall inform the teacher of the topic for consultation at the time he/she schedules the conference.
Evaluation Plan indicate how the trainee will be assessed (see example below).
Evaluation Plan. 1. Goals in collaboration between teacher and supervisor as outlined in the Phoenix Talent Schools’ Teacher Evaluation Handbook.
Evaluation Plan. A copy of the District 4 Evaluation Plan and the Evaluation Plan Description of Summary Evaluation Rating shall be provided by the district to each contractual employee with the Contract Agreement.
Evaluation Plan. After receiving the development grants, the will have a meeting with the Chair of the NRE Program to discuss the proposed development goals, revise when appropriate, and prepare a final set of goals for the duration of the three-year project. The overall effectiveness of the developmental grant will be monitored throughout the program duration and assessed in a systematic manner, with respect to the final set of goals. will annually submit to the Chair of the NRE program a short summary of her research and academic progress and will perform a self-assessment of their progress towards meeting the set goals. The Chair will meet with her to discuss formative and summative evaluation of her progress. The Chair will review the report, and the summary will be added to the progress report the PI will submit to the NRC. NRE is dedicated to creating the most effective, balanced and realistic faculty development program to benefit the new faculty, current program, and the students. The following five-step approach will be utilized to measure the effectiveness of the new faculty development program: • The effectiveness of the approach will be measured based on how the outcomes support the broader goals set forward in the previous evaluation period. Self-assessment will include teaching, research and professional and institutional/departmental service. • Qualitative and quantitative performance indicators will be reviewed to establish whether the activities that were planned are actually being carried out (yes/no) and carried out effectively. This indicators include: Research: number of ongoing/completed projects, publications, number of graduate students supported, number of grants applied for/received, undergraduate student involvement. Teaching: teaching effectiveness based on student course/instructor evaluation feedback, new course development/progress if any. Professional development: conference attendance and presentation, involvement in technical program committees (as a reviewer, session organizer, professional society division officer), seminars at peer institutions and national laboratories. Service to the institute: serving on MS/PhD committees, involvement in service committees, outreach activities.
