Design Review Board Sample Clauses

Design Review Board. A qualified Contractor Program Systems Engineering Manager shall, along with the XM Program Manager, co-chair the Design Review Board. Board members designated by the two co-chairmen shall include representatives of Program Management, Systems Engineering, responsible engineering activities, Manufacturing, Product Assurance, XM representatives, and other technical specialists as required to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the spacecraft design. However, XM may elect not to provide representatives to the Design Review Boards. The Board shall make recommendations and ask questions. In addition, XM may submit recommendations and questions. When a review is scheduled, copies of the design review package shall be sent to each member of the review team who shall be responsible for: Studying the data package carefully prior to the design review meeting. Notifying the responsible engineer of major discrepancies or oversights discovered prior to the meeting. Attending the meeting fully prepared to discuss the assigned areas of responsibility. If required, submitting written recommendations for improving the design. All recommendations and questions shall be evaluated by the Contractor, and responses to all recommendations and questions submitted shall be provided. Responsibility for action items shall be assigned and a schedule for completion of such items shall be included in the design review report. Recommendations shall be converted into action items jointly by XM and the Contractor. XM PROPRIETARY EXHIBIT B REV B 23 OF 88
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Review Board. Discovery shall have the right to designate one or more (as agreed by the Parties) representatives to participate in the design review board established by Chrysalis to oversee the design of Aerosol Devices for use in the Alliance (the “Design Review Board”). The role and voting power of such representative shall be mutually determined by the Parties.
Sample 1
Design Review Board. A qualified Contractor Program System Engineering Manager shall, along with the INTELSAT Program Manager or delegated individual, co-chair the Design Review Board. Board members shall include representatives of Program Asterisks (“**”) indicate omitted material pursuant to a request for confidential treatment INTEL-2400 EXHIBIT B REVISION 2 Management, System Engineering, responsible engineering activities, Manufacturing, Product Assurance, procurement, INTELSAT representatives, and other technical specialists as required to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the item design. The Board shall make recommendations and assign action items that shall be investigated ad resolved by responsible personnel. For each scheduled review, copies of the design review package shall be sent to each member of the review team who shall be responsible for:
Sample 1

Related to Design Review Board

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Independent Review Each of the parties hereto has reviewed this Release with its own counsel and advisors.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Performance Review The Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis and will make adjustments to salary or other compensation, as they deem appropriate in their sole and absolute discretion.

  • Sub-Adviser Review of Materials Upon the Adviser’s request, the Sub-Adviser shall review and comment upon selected portions, relating to the Sub-Adviser and/or Strategy (including the Allocated Portion), of the Registration Statement, other offering documents and ancillary sales and marketing materials prepared by the Adviser for the Fund, and participate, at the reasonable request of the Adviser and as agreed to by the Sub-Adviser, in educational meetings with placement agents and other intermediaries about portfolio management and investment-related matters of the Fund. The Sub-Adviser will promptly inform the Fund and the Adviser if any information in the Registration Statement is (or will become) inaccurate or incomplete.

  • Acceptance Testing The MCP must have the capability to report all elements in the Minimum Data Set as set forth in the ODJFS Encounter Data Specifications and must submit a test file in the ODJFS-specified medium in the required formats prior to contracting or prior to an information systems replacement or update. Acceptance testing of encounter data is required as specified in Section 29(a)(v) of this Appendix.

  • Performance Reviews Performance reviews will be conducted at least annually by the President/CEO or designee.

  • Periodic Review The Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Base Salary and Benefits (as defined below) from time to time in accordance with the normal business practices of the Company. The Company may in its sole discretion increase the Base Salary during the Term. The amount of any increase combined with the previous year's Base Salary shall then constitute Executive's Base Salary for purposes of this Agreement.

  • Commissioning preparation of a system or systems to allow hydrocarbons or other process fluids to be safely introduced into the system or systems for processing. In this phase testing will focus on systems, including utilities.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!