Common use of Employee Performance Evaluations Clause in Contracts

Employee Performance Evaluations. The District and the union agree that regular evaluations are a constructive way to provide employees with regular feedback, to recognize exemplary performance, and to correct unsatisfactory performance if necessary. a. Probationary employees. Probationary employees shall be provided evaluations following three (3), six (6) and nine (9) months of service. Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee’s supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. b. Regular employees. Regular full-time employees. Regular full-time employees shall be evaluated annually. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department’s reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of “unsatisfactory” shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation. Any proposed change to the established evaluation form shall be subject to negotiations.

Employee Performance Evaluations. The District and the union agree that regular evaluations are a constructive way to provide employees with regular feedback, to recognize exemplary performance, and to correct unsatisfactory performance if necessary. a. Probationary employees. Probationary employees shall be provided evaluations following three (3), six (6) and nine (9) months of service. ‌ Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee’s 's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. b. Regular employees. Regular full-time employees. Regular full-time employees shall be evaluated annually. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department’s reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of “"unsatisfactory” " shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation. Any proposed change The employee receiving an evaluation may request to have a Union representative present, during any meeting with management regarding the established evaluation form shall be subject when the Court intends to negotiationsgive (or has given) an overall rating of “unsatisfactory”.

Employee Performance Evaluations. The District and the union agree that regular evaluations are a constructive way to provide employees with regular feedback, to recognize exemplary performance, and to correct unsatisfactory performance if necessary. a. Probationary employees. Probationary employees shall be provided evaluations following three (3), six (6) and nine (9) months of service. Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee’s 's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. b. Regular employees. Regular full-time employees. Regular full-time employees shall be evaluated annually. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department’s reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of “"unsatisfactory” " shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation. Any proposed change The employee receiving an evaluation may request to have a Union representative present, during any meeting with management regarding the established evaluation form shall be subject when the Court intends to negotiationsgive (or has given) an overall rating of “unsatisfactory”.