Evaluation Disputes Sample Clauses

Evaluation Disputes. The City and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three (3) members from each Party (City and Library combined). The main purpose of the Committee will include, but is not limited to: - Review and update the language within the Job Evaluation Agreement (1979) to reflect current practices. - Review/resolve outstanding reclassification value disputes (internal comparators only). - Should the Committee be unable to join consensus, Steps 4 and 5 of the grievance procedure shall apply. It is further agreed that the Committee members for each party may be adjusted depending upon the nature of the topic/issue being discussed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Disputes. The Board and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three (3) members from each party (City and Library combined). The main purpose of the Committee will include, but is not limited to: - Review and update the language within the Job Evaluation Agreement (1979) to reflect current practices. - Review/resolve outstanding reclassification value disputes (internal comparators only). - Should the Committee be unable to gain consensus, Steps 4 and 5 of the grievance procedure shall apply. It is further agreed that the Committee members for each party may be adjusted depending upon the nature of the topic/issue being discussed. SCHEDULE "G" – JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEELETTER OF INTENT‌ JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEE LETTER OF INTENT Between: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF BURNABY And: THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 23 And: THE BURNABY FIREFIGHTERS' UNION, LOCAL 323 Subject: JOINT BENEFITS REVIEW COMMITTEE This Letter of Intent outlines the terms and conditions agreed to by the Joint Benefits Review Committee regarding the redesign of Disability Income Plans and Group Life Insurance; enhancements to Dental and Extended Health Benefits; and funding of the Employee Assistance Program. The proposed effective date of the changes is 1990 December 24 (except for those changes which cannot administratively be delivered); and is subject to ratification by all parties and other necessary approvals such as the Superintendent of Insurance, the membership of the Burnaby Municipal Benefit Society and the Superannuation Commissioner. The terms, conditions and definitions of coverage, rules and procedures, handling of CPP/WCB integration, subrogation and claims procedures for Disability Income Plans (Short Term Sick Leave, Medium Term Disability and Long Term Disability) will be identified in a Plan Document agreed to by all parties. In the absence of agreement by all parties to the wording of the initial Plan Document, this Letter of Intent will be considered to be terminated. The details of the changes agreed to by the parties for the various components of the plan are as follows: DISABILITY INCOME
Evaluation Disputes. The City and the Union agree to establish a Joint Evaluation Committee comprised of six (6) members, three
Evaluation Disputes. Employees who disagree with their evaluation shall be afforded the opportunity to attach a written rebuttal to the evaluation, which shall be placed in the employee‟s personnel file.

Related to Evaluation Disputes

  • Payment Disputes We will not exercise Our rights under Section 6.3 (Overdue Charges) or 6.4 (Suspension of Service and Acceleration) above if You are disputing the applicable charges reasonably and in good faith and are cooperating diligently to resolve the dispute.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.