Performance Confidence Assessment Sample Clauses

Performance Confidence Assessment. As a result of the relevancy and quality assessments of the recent contracts evaluated, offerors will receive an integrated performance confidence assessment rating. The resulting performance confidence assessment rating is made at the past performance factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an "Unknown Confidence" rating for the past performance factor. More recent and relevant performance will have a greater impact on the Performance Confidence Assessment than a less recent or relevant effort. A strong record of relevant past performance may be considered more advantageous to the Government than an "Unknown Confidence" rating. Likewise, a more relevant past performance record may receive a higher confidence rating and be considered more favorably than a less relevant record of favorable performance. The past performance factor will receive one of the performance confidence assessments described in Table 4. Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. Unknown (Neutral) Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. Work to be performed directly by a small business prime offeror will be evaluated as Small Business Participation. The Small Business Participation Commitment Document will become part of the resultant contract. The Government will evaluate whether the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD)...

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessment. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The City shall evaluate each Offeror’s performance based on (1) the description of past and present efforts provided by the Offeror, (2) questionnaire responses provided by the Offeror’s references, and (3) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The next aspect of the past performance evaluation will be to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts determined to be at least somewhat relevant. This is an assessment to establish the overall quality of the Offeror's past performance. The performance assessment utilizes CPAR data along with questionnaires (as described in Section L) and direct contact with references in order to gather information from customers on how well the Offeror performed past contracts.

Performance Confidence Assessment. An evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

Performance Confidence Assessment. This source selection requires less discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the SSEB may use the confidence ratings identified in Table 4 below.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The Offeror may provide descriptions for at least two and no more than four projects that are within the past six years from date of solicitation issuance for projects that are similar to this project in scope. The offeror may include projects from predecessor companies, proposed UAS IMS key personnel, and/or subcontractors. If an offeror (or predecessor companies, proposed UAS IMS key personnel, and/or subcontractors) does not have current or relevant past performance, the offeror shall state so. Along with each project description, the offeror shall provide a brief description of what role the key personnel and/or subcontractor referenced will play as it relates to UAS IMS (no need for brief description if project description is relating to the UAS IMS prime offeror). All projects submitted in response to this solicitation shall have been performed as a prime contractor, predecessor company, subcontractor, or Joint Venture (JV) partner. The small business prime contractor shall submit at least one project for consideration that they themselves performed (as a prime contractor, predecessor company, subcontractor, or Joint Venture (JV) partner). Please see the following definitions as they relate to this section: Prime contractor means the contractor has privity-of-contract with the Government or with the owner of a project or job, and has the full responsibility for its completion. The prime is responsible for all contractual obligations under a mutually binding legal relationship. When the Government awards a contract to a contractor, the contractor is considered the “prime” contractor. For example, “prime” contractors are identified as such on the cover page of contracts or task orders such as:  SF 1449 – Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items – (Block 17a identifies the prime contractor)  SF 26 – Award/Contract – (Block 7 identifies the prime contractor)  SF 33 – Solicitation, Offer, and Award – (Block 15A identifies the prime contractor)  Department of Defense (DD) Form 1155 – Order for Supplies or Services (Block 9 identifies the prime contractor)  Optional Form 307 – Contract Award (Block 7 identifies the prime contractor)  GSA Form 300 – Order for Supplies and Services (Block 6 identifies the prime contractor) Subcontractor means the contractor has privity-of-contract with a prime contractor. When a prime contractor awards a contract to a contractor, the contractor is considered a subcontractor. If the Offeror represents the combini...

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

Performance Confidence Assessment. This source selection requires less discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, Government may use the confidence ratings identified in Table 3 below.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The Government will evaluate the Offerors’ present/past performance information proposed in Volume III in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2). The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance information proposed in Volume III to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired though the source selection. The Government shall assign a rating to the past performance information utilizing the following table: Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.