Common use of Evaluation Procedure Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Procedure. 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, if provided, will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file. 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classes, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course.

Evaluation Procedure. 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, if provided, will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file. 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classescourses, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course.

Evaluation Procedure. 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, if provided, will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file.file.‌ 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classescourses, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course.

Evaluation Procedure. 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, administrator the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, circumstances a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, which if provided, provided will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file. 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classes, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course.

Evaluation Procedure. ‌ 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, if provided, will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file. 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classescourses, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course.

Evaluation Procedure. 1. Each department, division or other appropriate unit shall conduct annual evaluations of each unit member except: a) those unit members whose service will cease at the end of the current academic or fiscal year need not be evaluated; and b) any unit member having the rank of Professor with tenure and any unit member having the rank of Extension Educator with continuing contract shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. Any unit member having the rank of Associate Professor with tenure, any unit member having the rank of Associate Extension Educator with continuing contract and any Lecturer or Instructor with over six (6) years of continuous service in the same department, division or other appropriate unit shall be evaluated by the department, division or other appropriate unit every four (4) years, or more frequently upon written request of the unit member. c) Evaluations shall be scheduled to insure ensure that promotion, tenure, continuing contract status, and reappointment schedules and/or deadlines will be met. At the written request of an appropriate administrator, the peer committee shall determine whether to conduct peer evaluations on a more frequent basis than provided for above. Under normal circumstances, a faculty member will be evaluated only once during an academic year. In the event a second evaluation takes place within the same academic year, the faculty member may add items to their previous documentation. 2. The peer committee may request from the unit member supporting documents, or other information pertaining to the assignments of the unit member. 3. Upon request of the unit member, the chairman of the peer committee or the appropriate peer committee of each department, division or other appropriate unit, shall meet with each individual unit member being evaluated for xxxxx discussions of that person's professional performance. 4. The peer committee shall prepare a written evaluation. For one (1) week prior to placing the evaluation in the unit member's official personnel file, the unit member shall have the opportunity to supply written comments which, if provided, will be attached to the peer committee's evaluation. All evaluation reports of the peer committee, both majority and minority (if any) must be signed by all of the members of the committee. The names of all peer committee members must be listed listed, and any abstentions noted. 5. The evaluation, with response, if any, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file by the custodian of the file. 6. Peer and administrative reviews of electronic classescourses, discussions, and files shall follow department, or unit protocols established for evaluating instruction. Archived materials may not be used for evaluating instruction except in accordance with established department, division, or unit procedures, or with the faculty member’s consent. Archived material is information on course content that has been stored beyond the duration of the course. 7. For those hired on or after July 1, 2022, Senior Lecturers receiving their first quadrennial review (year 10) following achievement of just cause status shall be promoted to Principal Lecturer if they receive at least a satisfactory review emphasizing demonstrated contributions in accordance with the departmental evaluation criteria as developed pursuant to this Article. Promotion shall not be unreasonably denied. In the event of promotion to Principal Lecturer, the unit member shall receive salary increases according to the provisions in Article 20(D)(3), in addition to any other increases in accordance with this Agreement. In the event a unit member is not promoted to Principal Lecturer, consideration for promotion shall occur in subsequent quadrennial reviews consistent with this provision. This promotional amount shall not reduce the amount otherwise available for quadrennial review nor shall the awarding of the promotional amount reduce the amount awarded for stellar performance, salary compression, and/or equity.