Conclusion of the Evaluation Sample Clauses

Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all the final, signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations or references thereto, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation, the evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the post-evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall specify on the evaluation form the reasons for the alleged deficiencies. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within fifteen (15) workdays of the post-evaluation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Conclusion of the Evaluation of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation, the evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall specify on the evaluation form the reasons for the alleged deficiencies. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Conclusion of the Evaluation of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Conclusion of the Evaluation. 1. After the conclusion of the financial evaluation, the Competent Body shall proceed to establish the final ranking of Tenders in decreasing order of their final xxxx: L = Τ * 80% + C * 20% where: Τ = the Technical Offer evaluation xxxx, and C = the relative cost of the Financial Offer. 2. The Tender with the highest xxxx L shall be considered to be the most advantageous Tender based on best price-quality ratio. 3. In cases where the marks of two or more Tenders are the same, these Tenders are ranked in decreasing order of their Technical Offer xxxx.
Sample 1
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document specify on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory the alleged deficiencies. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member evaluated receives what they consider to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to their evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in their personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area xxxx. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All completed and signed evaluations and written responses will be forwarded to Human Resources for tracking, scheduling, and filing. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conclusion of the Evaluation

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!