Expedited timeline of alert dissemination Sample Clauses

Expedited timeline of alert dissemination. The timeline of the alert dissemination by the automatic EMR alerting service (with high specificity) will be much shorter than routine alert dissemination approaches, e.g. email, telephone conference, or mail. Considering all major stakeholders‟ interest areas, the evaluation will mainly focus on seven objectives: actionable alerts; consumption of alert; integration with decision support system; clinician action performed; sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of matching algorithm; and local customization. Evaluation elements These seven objectives were mapped with five evaluation elements, including system quality, quality of alerts, clinician use of the alerts, user perception, and impact, which were identified based on the logic model framework (Figure1). Logically, these domains are in a certain order (Figure2). If the system has high quality and provides relevant alerts and guidelines, then healthcare providers will be more likely to use the EMR alerting services and feel satisfied with them. Timely disseminating relevant public health alerts to healthcare providers to assist their clinical decision making will bring positive impacts to both public health agencies and health care authorities. When reporting the evaluation results, we can assess the causal relationship between technologies functions, alert usage, and public health and health care outcomes. It is important to show that this system performs well – providing relevant alerts and being accepted by healthcare providers. However, it is more critical to check whether this system could bring positive impacts on both public health information dissemination and health care quality. That‟s because we not only want to implement a high quality system, but also hope to realize “meaningful use” of our system. For each evaluation domain, I will provide many detailed information to guide the evaluation implementation, including what to measure (content), how to measure (design, methods, and indicators), how to collect data (data resource), and how to analyze the findings.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Expedited timeline of alert dissemination

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. How to File an Expedited Appeal Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

  • AUDIT REPORT SUBMISSION Audit reports must be submitted no later than 150 days following cancellation, termination or expiration of this Agreement.

  • Action Item Task MSU Status Comments I.1 The University will employ and empower a Clery Act compliance professional (CCP). The CCP must report to a Vice President (VP) or equivalent. The CCP must not be employed in or under the sole authority of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Implemented The Office of Audit, Risk and Compliance (OARC) hired a qualified candidate who began work in February 2020.

  • Quality- and Cost-Based Selection Except as ADB may otherwise agree, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging consulting services.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Submission Procedure a. If an appeal from suspension or reduction is not settled at Step 2, it may be presented to the Chief of Employee Relations within seven (7) calendar days from the date the decision was rendered.

  • TIMELINESS OF BILLING SUBMISSION The parties agree that timeliness of billing is of the essence to this Contract and recognize that the City is on a fiscal year. All xxxxxxxx for dates of service prior to July 1 must be submitted to the City no later that the first Friday in August of the same year.

  • REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, and required by PART I of this form shall be submitted, when required by 2 CFR 200.512, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) as provided in 2 CFR 200.36 and 200.512

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Notification Procedure (i) Each such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.