Extensible Provisioning Protocol Sample Clauses

Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator shall maintain the Extensible Provisioning Protocol ("EPP") in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 5730, 5731, 5732, 5734, 5910, and 3915 (and in the event Registry Operator accepts thick registration data RFC 5733) published by the Internet Engineering Task Force ("IETF") and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary. Registry Operator will support EPP in conformance with the aforementioned standards. If Registry Operator requires the use of functionality outside of EPP RFCs, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions using Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator is not required to submit documented EPP extensions to the IETF but to consider the recommendations on standardization described in section 2.1 of RFC 3735. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment. Registry Operator shall be able to accept IPv6 addresses as glue records in its Registry System and publish them in the DNS. Registry Operator shall offer public IPv6 transport for its Shared Registration System (SRS) to any Registrar, no later than six months after receiving the first request in writing from a gTLD accredited Registrar willing to operate the SRS over IPv6. Registry Operator shall take action to remove orphan glue records (as defined at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/committees/security/sac048.pdf) when provided with evidence in written form that such records are present in connection with malicious conduct.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator shall comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) including all successor standards, modifications or additions thereto relating to the provisioning and management of domain names using the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) in conformance with RFCs 3915, 5910, 5730, 5731, 5732, 5733 and 5734. If Registry Operator requires the use of proprietary EPP functionality, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet- Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator intends to implement the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (“EPP”) in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3733, 3734, 3735, and 3915 published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary. Subject to the Migration to Extensible Provisioning Protocol Plan described in Section 6 below, Registry Operator will support EPP in conformance with the aforementioned standards. Implementation of EPP is subject to Registry Operator reasonably determining that (i) the standard can be implemented in a way that minimizes disruption to customers; and (ii) the standard provides a solution for which the potential advantages are reasonably justifiable when weighed against the costs that Registry Operator and its registrar customers would incur in implementing the new standard.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator shall implement the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (“EPP”) in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3734, 3735, and 3915 published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator has implemented, and shall maintain support of, the Extensible Provisioning Protocol ("EPP") in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3734, 3735, and 3915shall comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force ("IETF") and/or anyincluding all successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto asrelating to the provisioning and management of domain names using the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) in conformance with RFCs 3915, 5910, 5730, 5731, 5732, 5733 and 5734. If Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary.requires the use of proprietary EPP functionality, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Subject to the Migration to Extensible Provisioning Protocol Plan described in Part 6 below, Registry Operator shall implementmaintain the Extensible Provisioning Protocol ("EPP") in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3734, 3735,RFCs 5730, 5731, 5732, 5734, 5910 and 3915 published by the Internet Engineering Task Force ("IETF") and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary. Subject to the Migration to Extensible Provisioning Protocol Plan described in Part 6 below, when Registry Operator implements EPP it will support EPP in conformance with the aforementioned standards. Implementation of EPP is subject to If Registry Operator reasonably determining that (i) the standard can be implemented in a way that minimizes disruption to customers; and (ii) the standard provides a solution for which the potential advantages are reasonably justifiable when weighed against the costs thatrequires the use of functionality outside of EPP RFCs, Registry Operator and its registrar customers would incur in implementingmust document EPP extensions using Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator is not required to submit documented EPP extensions to the IETF but to consider the recommendations on standardization described in section 2.1. of XXX 0000. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the new standard. EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator shall maintain the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (“EPP”) in conformance with the RFCs 5730, 5731, 5732, 5734, 5910 and 3915 published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary. Registry Operator will support EPP in conformance with the aforementioned standards. If Registry Operator requires the use of functionality outside of EPP RFCs, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions using Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator is not required to submit documented EPP extensions to the IETF but to consider the recommendations on standardization described in section 2.1. of XXX 0000. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment. Registry Operator shall be able to accept IPv6 addresses as glue records in its Registry System and publish them in the DNS. Registry Operator shall offer public IPv6 transport for its Shared Registration System (SRS) to any Registrar, no later than six months after receiving the first request in writing from a gTLD accredited Registrar willing to operate the SRS over IPv6.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Registry Operator shall implement the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (“EPP”) in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3734, 3735, and 3915comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) and/or anyincluding all successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto asrelating to the provisioning and management of domain names using the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) in conformance with RFCs 3915, 5910, 5730, 5731, 5732, 5733 and 5734. If Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary.requires the use of proprietary EPP functionality, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment. II2. Supported initial and renewal registration periods a. Initial registrations of Registered Names (where available according to functional specifications and other requirements) may be made in the registry for terms of up to ten years. b. Renewal registrations of Registered Names (where available according to functional specifications and other requirements) may be made in the registry for terms not exceed a total of ten years. c. Upon change of sponsorship of the registration of a Registered Name from one registrar to another, according to Part A of the ICANN Policy on Transfer of Registrations between Registrars, the term of registration of the Registered Name shall be extended by one year, provided that the maximum term of the registration as of the effective date of the sponsorship change shall not exceed ten years. d. The change of sponsorship of registration of Registered Names from one registrar to another, according to Part B of the ICANN Policy on Transfer of Registrations between Registrars shall not result in the extension of the term of the registration and Registry Operator may assist in such change of sponsorship.
Extensible Provisioning Protocol. Subject to the Migration to Extensible Provisioning Protocol Plan described in Part 6 below, Registry Operator shall implement the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (“EPP”) in conformance with the Proposed Standard and Informational RFCs 3730, 3731, 3732, 3734, 3735, and 3915 published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (“IETF”) and/or any successor standards, versions, modifications or additions thereto as Registry Operator deems reasonably necessary. Subject to the Migration to Extensible Provisioning Protocol Plan described in Part 6 below, when Registry Operator implements EPP it will support EPP in conformance with the aforementioned standards. Implementation of EPP is subject to Registry Operator reasonably determining that (i) the standard can be implemented in a way that minimizes disruption to customers; and (ii) the standard provides a solution for which the potential advantages are reasonably justifiable when weighed against the costs that Registry Operator and its registrar customers would incur in implementing the new standard.

Related to Extensible Provisioning Protocol

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes. 11.2 We may (i) compile statistical and other information related to the performance, operation and use of the Services, and (ii) use data from the Services in aggregated form for security and operations management, to create statistical analyses, and for research and development purposes (clauses i and ii are collectively referred to as “Service Analyses”). We may make Service Analyses publicly available; however, Service Analyses will not incorporate Your Content, Personal Data or Confidential Information in a form that could serve to identify You or any individual. We retain all intellectual property rights in Service Analyses. 11.3 We may provide You with the ability to obtain certain Oracle Software (as defined below) for use with the Services. If we provide Oracle Software to You and do not specify separate terms for such software, then such Oracle Software is provided as part of the Services and You have the non-exclusive, worldwide, limited right to use such Oracle Software, subject to the terms of this Agreement and Your order (except for separately licensed elements of the Oracle Software, which separately licensed elements are governed by the applicable separate terms), solely to facilitate Your use of the Services. You may allow Your Users to use the Oracle Software for this purpose, and You are responsible for their compliance with the license terms. Your right to use any Oracle Software will terminate upon the earlier of our notice (by web posting or otherwise) or the end of the Services associated with the Oracle Software. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Oracle Software is licensed to You under separate terms, then Your use of such software is governed by the separate terms. Your right to use any part of the Oracle Software that is licensed under the separate terms is not restricted in any way by this Agreement.

  • Statement of Work The Statement of Work to which Grantee is bound is incorporated into and made a part of this Grant Agreement for all purposes and included as Attachment A.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!