FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT Sample Clauses

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. The Company uses the market approach to measure its assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value by relevant TFRS, except that the cost approach or income approach is used when there is no active market or when a quoted market price is not available. Fair value hierarchy In applying the above-mentioned valuation techniques, the Company endeavors to use relevant observable inputs as much as possible. TFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement establishes a fair value hierarchy categorizing such inputs into three levels as follows: Level 1 - Use of quoted market prices in an observable active market for such assets or liabilities Level 2 - Use of other observable inputs for such assets or liabilities, whether directly or indirectly Level 3 - Use of unobservable inputs such as estimates of future cash flows. As at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had the following financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on which the fair value hierarchy is classified as follows : As at June 30, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value Investments in investment units - 181,043 - 181,043 Foreign currency forward contracts - 1,279 - 1,279 As at December 31, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Investments in investment units - 199,119 - 199,119 Foreign currency forward contracts - (514) - (514) Financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value Fair valuation techniques and inputs to Level 2 fair valuation The fair value of investments in investment units that are not listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand is determined by using the net asset value per unit as announced by the fund managers. The fair value of derivatives has been determined by using a discounted future cash flow model and a valuation model technique. Most of the inputs used for the valuation are observable in the relevant market, such as spot rates of foreign currencies, forward rate of the respective currencies, and interest rate yield curves. During the period, there were no transfers within the fair value hierarchy. Certain financial assets and financial liabilities is measured at fair value The following table gives information about how the fair values of these financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on fair value hierarchy as at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Financial assets and As at June As at December Fair value and key inputs for fair financial liabilities 30, 2...
Sample 1See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels: • Level 1-inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. • Level 2-inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. • Level 3-inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The determination to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy is based upon the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 inputs, observable inputs (that is, inputs that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses for Level 3 financial instruments include changes in fair value due in part to observable inputs that are part of the valuation methodology. Level 3 financial instruments include crude oil options, all NGL derivatives and the embedded derivatives in commodity contracts discussed in Note 14 as they have significant unobservable inputs. The methods and assumptions described above may produce a fair value that may not be realized in future periods upon settlement. Furthermore, while the Partnership believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. For further discussion see Note 14.
Sample 1Sample 2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance under IFRS for all fair value measurements. IFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under IFRS when fair value is required or permitted. The application of IFRS 13 has not impacted the fair value measurements carried out by the Company. June 30, 2015 with comparative figures for the twelve month period ending Dec 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
Sample 1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (“IFRS 13”), which is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with early application permitted. IFRS 13 defines fair value, sets out in a single standard a framework for measuring fair value, requires disclosures about fair value measurements, and applies when other IFRSs require or permit fair value measurements. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of the standard or determined whether it will adopt the standard early.
Sample 1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. IFRS 13 is a new standard that applies to both financial and non-financial items measured at fair value. It defines fair value, sets out a single framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. Previously, a variety of fair value techniques and disclosures were possible under the requirements of separate applicable IFRSs. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sample 1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT. AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement provides a single source of guidance for determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. AASB 13 does not change when fair value is required to be used, but rather provides guidance on how to determine fair value when required or permitted. The adoption of AASB 13 had no material effect on the financial position or the consolidated financial statements of the Group. Additional fair value disclosures have been incorporated into the financial statements.
Sample 1

Related to FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Measurement Should the State terminate this contract as herein provided, no fees other than fees due and payable at the time of termination shall thereafter be paid to the Engineer. In determining the value of the work performed by the Engineer prior to termination, the State shall be the sole judge. Compensation for work at termination will be based on a percentage of the work completed at that time. Should the State terminate this contract under paragraph (4) or (5) above, the Engineer shall not incur costs during the thirty-day notice period in excess of the amount incurred during the preceding thirty days.

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio Permit the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter ending on or after September 30, 2008 to be greater than 3.5 to 1.0.

  • EBITDA The term “EBITDA” shall mean, with respect to any fiscal period, “Consolidated EBITDA” as defined in the Credit Agreement, provided that the following should also be excluded from the calculation of EBITDA to the extent not already excluded from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement: (i) Non-Cash Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement) related to any issuances of equity securities; (ii) fees and expenses relating to the Acquisition; (iii) financing fees (both cash and non-cash) relating to the Acquisition; (iv) covenant-not-to-compete payments to certain members of the Company’s senior management and related expenses; (v) expenses (or any portion thereof) incurred outside of the ordinary course of business that are approved by the Board which the Board determines in its good faith discretion are in the best interest of the Company but which will have a disproportionately adverse impact on the Company’s short term financial performance, affecting the Company’s ability to achieve financial targets related to the vesting of the Class C Units under the Incentive Unit Subscription Agreements or the Company’s annual bonus plan; (vi) costs and expenses incurred in connection with evaluating and consummating acquisitions not contemplated by the Company’s annual plan, as such plan is approved by the Board in good faith; (vii) related party expenditures that are subject to the prior written consent of the Majority Executives pursuant to Section 2.3(a) of the Securityholders Agreement but have failed to receive such consent; (viii) advisors’ fees and expenses incurred outside the ordinary course of business related solely to Vestar’s activities that are unrelated to the Company; (ix) costs associated with any put option or call option contemplated by any Rollover Subscription Agreement or Incentive Unit Subscription Agreement; (x) costs associated with any proposed initial Public Offering or Sale of the Company (as such terms are defined in the Securityholders Agreement); (xi) expenses related to any litigation arising from the Acquisition; (x) management fees and costs related to the activities giving rise to such fees that are paid to, paid for or reimbursed to Vestar and its Affiliates; and (xii) material expenditures or incremental expenditures inconsistent with prior practice (to the extent that prior practice is relevant) required by Board (where Management Managers (as defined in the Securityholders Agreement) unanimously dissent) unless such expenditures are reasonably likely to result in any benefit (whether economic or non-economic) to the Company as determined by the Board in its good faith discretion.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!